no, it was you who originally described paying children for sex as "consensual" and "a voluntary act".
Not what I was talking about Mr. Try to Combine two separate things as if they were one. I was addressing your false allegations.
You have taken an observation, discussion or speculation of a thing, and determined that it is also my endorsement of the thing being observed etc. That's intellectually shallow and the tactic of a poor debater, like you.
If you were going to refute something you could start with explaining how the nature of an act, even a heinous one, can change whether or not the act was consented to. You haven't addressed that. I doubt you can.
