UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
let's cut the shit: are you for or against the government being all up in my wife's uterus?
Why are republicans against legalization of marijuana?
- Thread starter BadDog40
- Start date
let's cut the shit: are you for or against the government being all up in my wife's uterus?
lol I already said the right to life trumps. Wifes life endangered, physically OR mentally, by having a baby? I have no problem with her aborting. Why can't you understand since I'm repeating myself? The weed that good?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the weed is pretty good a little fluffy due to a hiatus i had to take when it started flowering, but 'right to life' is ambiguous euphemism at best.
so say i knocked my wife up and she was simply not ready to have child. should she be allowed to abort the fetus, or should this be not allowed?
i do not want a debate on abortion here, i just want to know what your views are.
lmao I already answered.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
then i misread you, and i apologize.
you support my wife's right to choose to abort. i admit, i missed the 'or mentally' part in post 22. i was primed to see your position as only if she was endangered physically (extreme position), and not mentally (right to choose, basically).
nothing to reconcile then, let's move on.
well, to be exact, her right to choose in a few "certain instances"
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
say she is not prepared to be a parent and it threatens her career goals in life.
thumbs up for abortion, or thumbs down?
threatens career goals lol I already answered that. How come you have to ask?
Dinosaur Bone
Active Member
There are people registered as Republican who are pro-tyranny, pro-nanny state [guv'ment interference in every aspect of your life], pro-black market, anti-freedom, anti-liberty etc. These persons are NOT Proper Republicans. They are [expletive deleted] goddamn fucking RINO's.
The super church neo-conservative RINO's who violate, and disregard the Repubiclican Principles need to get out of the GOP, and form their own party. Good riddance.
The super church neo-conservative RINO's who violate, and disregard the Repubiclican Principles need to get out of the GOP, and form their own party. Good riddance.
This is why I have looked to the Tea Party. The republican party is still lost, no matter how hard they try they love to siphon our money to their buddies. Same as the dems just different causes.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i have to ask because you never state your position clearly.
when is her life 'mentally endangered'? that's about as clear as a shit-covered windshield.
but i think i get it by now. you are for the right to choose. otherwise, this previous statement of yours would be completely irreconcilable....
incorrect . Like I said you REFUSE to get it. I have stated my opinion AND have been very consistent. YOU are the one through your false premise who doesn't understand or more likely because you disagree with it you refuse to see it. The right to life trumps the right to property except in those cases where the mothers life is threatened. Do you want me to go over every single case? They are in a very very small minority. You cannot continue to misrepresent others and hope to find the truth.
Believe me I am very tempted to make you and the Ute not continue your bloodline
, but it's not about what I want, it's about my belief in the Constitution and personal property rights. It's the same reason I am against the death penalty. No one has the right to take anothers property, life in this example is property. If I thought otherwise then I'd be another pandering politician.
beardo
Well-Known Member
What if i'm not ready for so many people and people who I don't like or agree with or are diffrent from me what about them can we abort people we dont like or aren't ready for? What about euthanasia?
mipbar
Well-Known Member
Spot on...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
dude, you really suck at debating. tell me WHY i don't get it....don't just keep chanting it. chanting =/= debating.
still ambiguous, and inconsistent with your previous statements. you previously stated "when the life of the mother is physically or mentally endangered", and now you come out with this different version. and i could also say that a fetus is a parasite that can not exist if not for the mother's womb, and thus is not life and thus has no right to life.
you could have made this all so much easier on yourself had you simply asnwered up or down, yay or nay to my previous clealy-worded examples that depended on no amount of interpretation. in fact, i will give you another chance to do so:
if my wife was simply not ready to mother a child (let's say it threatened her career goals) and i lived in the society of the gospel of parker, would the almighty parker allow for an abortion to proceed?
ink the world
Well-Known Member
Huh?
So its a personal choice what a person does w/ their body when pot is concerned, yet on another thread where abortion comes up you feel the opposite.....freedom is freedom, not only when it meets your moral standards.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the gospel of parker.
ink the world
Well-Known Member
Wait Buck, I'm sure we just dont understand,
like my other lost puppy unclebuck you ignored my point that that the right to life trumps all other rights. It's the 5th post in this thread.
Are you a liar that feels he has to misrepresent others ideals because yours are so weak? Is your ability to comprehend posts that lacking? Or is your memory that bad?
like I said that is your failed attempt at understanding a simple statement. My stance has not changed. That is your failed reasoning. I have already answered that question. It is not my fault YOU don't understand. Anyone who has looked back at those posts can see for themselves. You have not once quoted me when I said the right to life trumps property rights, without the right to life property rights are meaningless. EXCEPT to lie and say, oh now he is saying it. Like I said disagree fine, but ignore the foundation of my statement?
LMAO How can you argue with me, when you don't understand MY point?
Will this help when I explain the mental part of it. Someones mental condition CAN cause their physical condition to deteriorate. So the mental turns into physical. Does that clear THAT part up?
Like I said you are wanting me to decide on a very small case to case part of the debate on abortion issue.
My first post in this thread boy
https://www.rollitup.org/politics/3...ainst-legalization-marijuana.html#post4734877
from that post "Your body is your property and you can do whatever you want to with it, as long as you do not step on the rights of others."
like I said it is not my fault you do not understand or purposely misrepresent what I say.
Your short term memory is pretty bad. Get that checked out.
Similar threads
