that means if a hospital that depends on federal funding even suggests that it is OK to be gay, they no longer exist and people go without needed care because ron paul thinks being gay is unacceptable, and that bigoted stance is even more important than people's health.
lots of programs promote heterosexuality, you knuckle dragging cretin. like, for example, the GOP. or churches. or heal the gay foundations like marcus bachmann set up for himself.
that's not a crazy conclusion, you brainwashed little child, that is a direct consequence of the bill ronald the bigot wrote.
Federally funded?
| pseudo-intellectual | ||
| 4 signs of the pseudo-intellectual 1. Quoting 2. Going against common thought without evidence 3. Bringing up intellectualism in non-requistite situations 4. Un-neccersary use of verbs and adjectives with 4 syllables or more Dude #1: hey wanna go to the movies tomorrow night? Dude #2: Nah, the cinema is so low-brow. I don't understand how so many people find aesthetic values in it. I'm going home to read. As Descartes said "cogito, ergo sum". Dude #1: Yeah....OK. | ||
| 2. | pseudo-intellectual | |
| 1. One who attempts to flex intellect that does not exist within his or her own mind. 2. Can probably be found with a thesaurus in hand, while in a chat room, looking up new insults that are synonymous with "stupid" in order to boost his or her own undeserved ego. 3. Typical cases of pseudo-intellectualism involve pre-pubescent 15 year olds that think they have everything figured out, including, but not limited to: life, religion, politics, education, and sex. Ironically, they have never quite experienced either of the aforementioned. 4. Pretends he or she has an opinion. 5. Posseses a severe tendency to blindly and wholeheartedly believe any bullshit they hear, only to subsequently regurgitate the misinformation to anyone they see in an asinine attempt to appear more intelligent than a used, broken condom. 6. Should the victim of the verbal onslaught happen to have a differing opinion, the pseudo-intellectual will revert to his or her thesaurus and insult the opposition with words he or she never knew existed, and probably cannot even pronounce. 7. Annoyingly and constantly refers to the word antidisestablishmentarianism, as if knowledge of said word defined his or her illegitimately high intelligence quotient. 8. Typically a hypocrite; creates many, many contradictions. Most online grammar/spelling Nazis can relate. 9. Always ends a bullshit "argument" with, "I win, so stfu." Win what, dipshits? Your opinions weren't fact in the first place. | ||
| 3. | pseudo-intellectual | |
| Someone who pursues knowledge in a variety of categories for purely social reasons and tends to have only a basic understanding of many concepts. The pseudo-intellectual doesn't seek knowledge for the purpose of better understanding the world, but rather to enhance their image. They also prefer to interpret concepts in a way that allows them to use their knowledge as a weapon in social scenarios. They'll use the misinterpretation of facts to appear objective and correct, and thus unaccountable, when "talking shit" on another person. The pseudo-intellectual will challenge opinions or views as a way of making a personal attack. They then usually assume an imagined victory and will feel that the one they've attacked has been "put in their place". Pseudo-intellectuals are very catty and have a strong desire to socially dominate others. Pseudo-intellectuals are quick to judge others and are usually very sure of their superiority based on their ability to use knowledge as social ammo. They'll use any means available to prove themselves "correct" and tend to believe that being correct gives them a blank check for any social pursuits, including ones that are undertaken purely for self gratification. Given their usual motivation to either impress or dominate their peers, the Pseudo-intellectual is completely uninterested in any knowledge that they can't use in this capacity. |
yep, and plenty. google "faith based programs that receive federal funds".
Celebrating stupidity.
The only way anyone can do any research anymore is if it is federally funded. This effectively categorizes homosexuality next to schedule 1 drugs.
By this line of logic, I can't say anything smart with out someone having an excuse to dismiss it as something some smart guy said.
and crybaby little losers are prone to posting direct quotes without citation and go off on crybaby little tangents when their hero and savior is dragged through the mud for the bigot and misogynist that he is.
ya think i got them a bit too worked up?
Hey now! i support Paul and have at LEAST 40 brain cells left
"Arrogance on the part of the meritorious is even more offensive to us than the arrogance of those without merit: for merit itself is offensive."
+rep for using them well.Hey now! i support Paul and have at LEAST 40 brain cells left
looks like you are using lies and strawmen to ease the pain of cognitive dissonance in your little brainwashed mind.So your logic of why you don't like Ron Paul is:
A) His suits don't fit him correctly which makes him unelectable because fashion is very important to you.
B) He says that he believes abortion is immoral but will do nothing to stop the use of the pills.
C) He didn't not allow federally funded heterosexuality programs in his bill proposed in 1980 that never passed.
--------------------------------------------------
Looks like you got it all wrapped up, open and shut case. You have changed my mind, I will now vote for Obama.
A) His suits don't fit him correctly which makes him unelectable because fashion is very important to you.