Zimmerman sues NBC

desert dude

Well-Known Member
it's just the same shit, over, and over, and over again. day in and day out. thread after thread after thread.

i just don't get it.
And yet you come back and read, over, and over, and over, post after post. For days. I just don't get it. If you are that bored with it, and I don't blame you a bit if you are, then read something else, or call somebody a racist, that is always good for a laugh.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
And yet you come back and read, over, and over, and over, post after post. For days. I just don't get it. If you are that bored with it, and I don't blame you a bit if you are, then read something else, or call somebody a racist, that is always good for a laugh.
i read it because i'm bored and i find it really amusing. i certainly wouldn't jump into the middle of it though. i'd be too embarrassed. ;)

most of it i just skim thru, hoping something or someone will finally give. i doubt it will ever happen.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
i read it because i'm bored and i find it really amusing. i certainly wouldn't jump into the middle of it though. i'd be too embarrassed. ;)

most of it i just skim thru, hoping something or someone will finally give. i doubt it will ever happen.
It will have to be Buck that gives... :-)
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
i read it because i'm bored and i find it really amusing. i certainly wouldn't jump into the middle of it though. i'd be too embarrassed. ;)

most of it i just skim thru, hoping something or someone will finally give. i doubt it will ever happen.
What gets me is that the topic of the thread was about Zimm's law suit against NBC and whether they libeled him. The Trayvonophiles immediately leapt in and turned the discussion into a repeat of the original discussion about "who dun it".

Buck waded in with his documentary proof complete with "T intersection" and "fifty feet is fucking impossible" and "stalking". It's all very convincing in Buckyberg.

One thing all of these Zimmerman discussions have convinced me of is that a hung jury is a near certainty if Zimm ever goes to trial.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
What gets me is that the topic of the thread was about Zimm's law suit against NBC and whether they libeled him. The Trayvonophiles immediately leapt in and turned the discussion into a repeat of the original discussion about "who dun it".

Buck waded in with his documentary proof complete with "T intersection" and "fifty feet is fucking impossible" and "stalking". It's all very convincing in Buckyberg.

One thing all of these Zimmerman discussions have convinced me of is that a hung jury is a near certainty if Zimm ever goes to trial.
i like how everyone keeps referring to "the original thread".

"i said this in the original thread ..."
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
i find it funny that the teams are ALWAYS the same. you won't find 2 people agreeing in this thread and disagreeing in another. i think half the time people go against what they really feel simply so they stay on "the same team". nobody here really has a thought of their own. it's all predictable and redundant. :sleep:
I think if you really pay attention you will find that isn't true at all. I agree with Bucky on plenty of things, heck once I almost agreed with Chessus/Dookie but figured I had gone full retard.
 

Carthoris

Well-Known Member
we don't know that's a fact. that is an assumption your mind has convinced itself is a fact.

video of him pretty much right before this went down says he was very much in control, walking home quietly.

what we do know is that zimmerman has a history, we know he was following martin, and we know martin is dead. only in a closed ass mind would you think that the followee is guilty...

We know it is fact because of where the incident happened and how much time Zimmerman spent on the next road over after Martin went down the road to his own house. You are refuting solid fact because you are biased.
 

Carthoris

Well-Known Member
all we know for a fact is that he was talking on his phone until a minute before the murder.

do you like to carry on phone conversations when you're lying in wait?

fucking idiot.



except there is no evidence that he was a thief or a drug dealer and they have already concluded that the THC present in his system was not enough for him to be "high".

you really need to get up to speed on the facts of the case, you racist fuck.

"The defense is going to present Martin as a out of control thieving 17 year old drug dealer who was high at the time of the confrontation that was wandering around unsupervised in the neighborhood."

So, now, even the defense Zimmerman's lawyers will use makes me racist. Bravo, bravo. Biased cumbubble.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"The defense is going to present Martin as a out of control thieving 17 year old drug dealer who was high at the time of the confrontation that was wandering around unsupervised in the neighborhood."

So, now, even the defense Zimmerman's lawyers will use makes me racist. Bravo, bravo. Biased cumbubble.
you're racist no matter what defense they use, clawfoot.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
your a rascist becuase you see a black teen in a hoodie as evidence to your presumptions of his intentions .

.and you even said up top he went to go home down the T

, but you still refuse to admit that the frame of setting that makes martin up to no good is all based on his external appearance , . . . ..and your opinion along with another bigot with a history of bigotry toward others

and since there is much more evidence to support he was on his way home in rainy weather in a a hoodie with two items he purchased at 7-11 . .

you refuse to acknowledged even the smallest amount of real facts for hearsay and conjecture all originally made up or claimed by teh shooter of a unarmed 17 year old kid, within his rights to walk home in the rain

your bias is obvious, UB is a bleeding heart lib so he has to take the victims side no matter what, and it is so obvious to every logical person here that Zimmerman hunted Z down and then confronted him . . . . and imho as M was Standing his ground was killed for it . . the constant reworking of the events by Z and his lawyers, multiple lawyers .. it is so obvious that its laughable to even assume otherwise . . kinda like OJ . . . now will he get off . . . that is the big question . . can he prove he had a constitutional right to kill that boy . . .. i doubt it


you cant cry wolf after you have made so many of teh same mistakes over and over and over . . . .in America we dont reward stupidity . . . . acquitted or guilty, Z will be a American loser the rest of his life
 
Top