Mass Murder by Blade, you Vast Idiots

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
Really Beef. There is a novel in you somewhere. I used to be the guy that made them laugh (or jump usually), for the photo...I was not that good at it. Must be an art. But, an unhappy baby is the usual.

Anyway, I graduated to selling the photo layout, upsales in the home, for a while.
I would suck at that job.



Work appropriate? Meh...
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
Yes, China just recently but there have been blade attacks in the USA recently. And all over all time.
Yeah but this thread was started with the example from China, so why should my examples from other countries suddenly become invalid? Only data that support one side of the argument are allowed? Fine, we still have single perp domestic gun incidents where no other weapon was used with death tolls in the 20's. What is the greatest single perp domestic incident death toll from massacre by knife or by vehicle when no other weapon was involved? Since you seem to have figures on hand based on your response.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Yeah but this thread was started with the example from China, so why should my examples from other countries suddenly become invalid? Only data that support one side of the argument are allowed? Fine, we still have single perp domestic gun incidents where no other weapon was used with death tolls in the 20's. What is the greatest single perp domestic incident death toll from massacre by knife or by vehicle when no other weapon was involved? Since you seem to have figures on hand based on your response.
The single greatest mass murder in the USA wasn't with a gun or a knife.
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
The single greatest mass murder in the USA wasn't with a gun or a knife.
Have any other irrelevant non sequiturs? Also, have a citation for that? What is the single greatest mass murder by a single perpetrator? Please do enlighten. As I have provided specific examples with my assertions.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Anders Behring Breivik killed 69 people by gun and 8 people by bomb, all in one day. Woo Bum-Kon killed 57 by gun. Martin Bryant killed 35 by gun. I could go on. Also all these numbers are from single perp actions, whereas the blade attack that started this was committed by over 10 people (meaning an average of 3 kills per person). Dunno where that guy came up with the idea that 27 was the highest, but I do know that very few people on here have done any research to back up their claims. They just find one piece of data that seems to help them and they extrapolate their own ideas from that.
He had a select fire carbine rifle and a Glock 32 which is chambered for .357, he wasn't just some girly boy with a death wish.

Thats the main difference, he wanted a death toll, most American mass shootings seem to be done for attention by angsty kids.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Have any other irrelevant non sequiturs? Also, have a citation for that? What is the single greatest mass murder by a single perpetrator? Please do enlighten. As I have provided specific examples with my assertions.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/15/mass-killings-main/3821897/

Mass killing is not even tracked with 60% accuracy by the FBI. Make sure you watch the video
USA tdday, has no axe to grind

.............mass killings account for just 1% of all murders nationally.

It was a school based rampage with fire bombs, dynamite, etc in 1927.

Bath Consolidated School before the bombing
LocationBath Township, Clinton County, Michigan, USA
DateMay 18, 1927
TargetBath Consolidated School, house, farm and wife
Attack type
School bombing, mass murder, murder-suicide, suicide truck bombing, arson, uxoricide
Weapon(s)
Deaths45 total; 44 at the school (including the perpetrator) and the perpetrator's wife at home
Non-fatal injuries
58
PerpetratorAndrew P. Kehoe
Motive
  • Revenge for defeat in local election
  • Personal and financial stress
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Yeah but this thread was started with the example from China, so why should my examples from other countries suddenly become invalid? Only data that support one side of the argument are allowed? Fine, we still have single perp domestic gun incidents where no other weapon was used with death tolls in the 20's. What is the greatest single perp domestic incident death toll from massacre by knife or by vehicle when no other weapon was involved? Since you seem to have figures on hand based on your response.
Are you trying to say that there were not 8 people hacked by blades in the USA recently. It is part of immigrant angst murder syndrome. They kill their family with a cleaver or something.

I think you just need to consult Uncle Google. Guns are not the mass murder weapon of most death. Never have been.

Rampage killing by blade

there you go
 

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
Are you trying to say that there were not 8 people hacked by blades in the USA recently. It is part of immegrant angst murder synrome. They kill their family with a cleaver or something.

I think you just need to consult Uncle Google. Guns are not the mass murder weapon of most death. Never has been.

Rampage killing by blade

there you go
Most murders are done with firearms. Not sure about most 'mass murders'.

[h=1]Weapon[/h]
Firearm111,289
Knife20,503
Other11,364
Personal weapons10,079
Blunt object7,049
Strangulation1,536
Fire1,342
Asphyxiation1,225
Drugs638
Drowning239
Poison130
Explosives53
Pushed/thrown out window35


10 years of USA stats. 2000-2010
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Most murders are done with firearms. Not sure about most 'mass murders'.

Weapon

Firearm111,289
Knife20,503
Other11,364
Personal weapons10,079
Blunt object7,049
Strangulation1,536
Fire1,342
Asphyxiation1,225
Drugs638
Drowning239
Poison130
Explosives53
Pushed/thrown out window35


10 years of USA stats. 2000-2010
And not link. Wow. You are something.

Afraid of the source scorn, not doubt. Where did you get that?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Here is how you do it.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8
Murder Victims by Weapon, 2007–2011



Weapons 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Total 14,916 14,224 13,752 13,164 12,664
Total firearms: 10,129 9,528 9,199 8,874 8,583
Handguns 7,398 6,800 6,501 6,115 6,220
Rifles 453 380 351 367 323
Shotguns 457 442 423 366 356
Other guns 116 81 96 93 97
Firearms, type not stated 1,705 1,825 1,828 1,933 1,587
Knives or cutting instruments 1,817 1,888 1,836 1,732 1,694
Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.) 647 603 623 549 496
Personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)[SUP]1[/SUP] 869 875 817 769 728
Poison 10 9 7 11 5
Explosives 1 11 2 4 12
Fire 131 85 98 78 75
Narcotics 52 34 52 45 29
Drowning 12 16 8 10 15
Strangulation 134 89 122 122 85
Asphyxiation 109 87 84 98 89
Other weapons or weapons not stated 1,005 999 904 872 853


  • [SUP]1[/SUP] Pushed is included in personal weapons.
 

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
And not link. Wow. You are something.

Afraid of the source scorn, not doubt. Where did you get that?
Wall street Journal.

http://projects.wsj.com/murderdata/#view=all

Wall Street Journal got the Info from the FBI.

[h=1]Methodology[/h] The FBI collects this data from the states, except for Florida. Florida doesn't use the FBI's guidelines when reporting additional information about homicides. The FBI data don't capture all homicides. The states' reporting is voluntary, and the country's thousands of police agencies aren't consistent in how they report. Some states, including New York, reported no justifiable homicides at all for some years. In recording the circumstances of a murder, the information recorded in the FBI data may capture only the relationship of the killer to one of the victims -- but not other victims -- in a given situation. Because of the unlimited number of scenarios in which a homicide can occur, the coding used in the FBI database may not explain the full set of circumstances involved.
The data in this interactive is best read as a big-picture summary of the crimes committed nationwide. Not all descriptions may be completely accurate, and further details of specific situations are not available. The information in this database does not reflect convictions for murder or other criminal charges.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
And gosh darn it. That looks like everything is going down except explosives, while drowning is regaining popularity.

A mother just tied to drive out into the ocean...tried? She did and the wave were tossing the car. Trying to kill her kids.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Wall street Journal.

http://projects.wsj.com/murderdata/#view=all

Wall Street Journal got the Info from the FBI.

Methodology

The FBI collects this data from the states, except for Florida. Florida doesn't use the FBI's guidelines when reporting additional information about homicides. The FBI data don't capture all homicides. The states' reporting is voluntary, and the country's thousands of police agencies aren't consistent in how they report. Some states, including New York, reported no justifiable homicides at all for some years. In recording the circumstances of a murder, the information recorded in the FBI data may capture only the relationship of the killer to one of the victims -- but not other victims -- in a given situation. Because of the unlimited number of scenarios in which a homicide can occur, the coding used in the FBI database may not explain the full set of circumstances involved.
The data in this interactive is best read as a big-picture summary of the crimes committed nationwide. Not all descriptions may be completely accurate, and further details of specific situations are not available. The information in this database does not reflect convictions for murder or other criminal charges.
Best to do raw feed. Why quote a newspaper when the next link is the source? Newspapers Lie.
 

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
And gosh darn it. That looks like everything is going down except explosives, while drowning is regaining popularity.

A mother just tied to drive out into the ocean...tried? She did and the wave were tossing the car. Trying to kill her kids.
Right on.

So, the stats show that by a striking margin, guns are the most used weapons in murders.

Wouldn't you agree?
 
Top