Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable
- Thread starter sheskunk
- Start date
Doer
Well-Known Member
You should not bother, Deadandsoft.
Now you talk about anonymous apology?
That is even more worthless than your anonymous insulting mealy mouth,
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Its fucking true, it was owned by one of the banking cabal whose business is in the shitter and took out a multi billion dollar insurance policy months before it "magically" fell down even though it was undamaged by the Tomahawks...sorry, I mean "commercial airliners".Harrekin! The answer is in building 7. You cracked me up with that!
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html
I dunno about the source, the content is public knowledge tho.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
I understand.
You'll never answer the question.
Your misinterpretation of our exchange tells me how skewed your take on the world is and how bitter you are.
I don't fear you. i believe in civility so I apologized for not using the word 'phony' abstractly . I did not 'back' down as all I did was press you for an answer: you were bobbing and weaving with everyone and continue to do so. You made a claim about the science of climatology and have computer science as a background.
Now i can say with complete confidence: you're being dishonest. Not acknowledging that you're not qualified to cast aside a whole area of science is intellectually dishonest.
troll? liar
mind your business don't
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
You're bullshit. You spout nonsense that you can't even prove.
RIU needs a section for cranks. People actually want to discuss issues in Politics.
Drama and DoNothing don't. You just want to piss on people's legs.
Fuck off crank.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
Go talk to your plants. They're the only ones listening.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You seem insatiable. If you had a guy at work the other day and now you are looking for a go with Alec Baldwin I congratulate your libido. Don't forget to wear a rubber, you never know where Alec has been or who's been there.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Alec Balls-Win.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
well just for starters:
1 : that blog is just an outlet for the opinions of global warming touts, it's author has no scientific accreditation and has no "climatologist" credibility
2 : their "citations" almost invariably go to another page of "Skeptical Science" instead of an outside source
3 : it's a motherfucking BLOG
4 : if the critics are impeached by their ideological affiliation, why are the touts immune to the same impeachment?
5 : if "Big _____________" financial backing contaminates real skeptical inquiry, then why are the bankrollers of the touts so virtuous?
6 : the entire blog is so rife with inaccuracies, simplifications and dunderheaded appeals to authority it is useless as a source
7 : opinions from ACTUAL SCIENTISTS who disagree, or have an alternate theory that fits the data at least as well are NOT PRESENT.
8 : scientific inquiry is not handled in the mocking, hateful ad hominem drenched Bucky Style
9 : "Skeptical Science" is anything but skeptical or scientific
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
if that was "TLDR"
then i would suggest Moar Ritalin.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
Smartest ones in the room.My plants have better sense than to listen to me.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
so the IPCC (who are totally not politically motivated or funded by any "Big___________" financiers...) are the source authority on "Anthropogenic Climate Disruption/change/warming/Crisis of the century of the week" despite the well documented shenaingans, and their shameless retconning of their theory from "Almost entirely man made" to "less than 50% man made" and the highly public defections from their ranks over their falsification of data.
the IPCC is a POLITICAL panel, which has an agenda, and blatantly fakes the data to support their agenda
they still refuse to acknowledge the real question "How Much?", in favour of post-modernist assumptions and useless "solutions" which serve no purpose but to hamper the economic activity of first world nations to support third world shitholes and the despots who run them.
the IPCC is driven by post-modern guilt and a desire for "fairness" and "equal outcomes" for backwards retrograde barbaric dung heaps and the juntas that control them.
Protip: Post-Modernism assumes that success is proof of wrongdoing or corruption. now you dont have to google that shit.
Edit: follow your link and try to learn more about Working Group 1 (the "scientists")
youll get this:
even the interweb doesnt trust the IPCC
Last edited: