A question for Libertarians.

B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
MidwesternGro said:
Law school is a fucking joke. You are assuming that the professor, from what was likely a lower ranked law school, actually gave a shit what he was grading. Any idiot with a liberal arts degree and a pulse can get into a law school, some law schools have a median LSAT score of 146.

If you were in medical school I would be impressed. Hell, half the graduates from your average law school don't even get a job practicing law because the market is so saturated. Be glad you got addicted to drugs instead of finishing law school and being 130k+ in debt with little to no income.
Click to expand...
That is only half true.

There is an excess of law schools right now. They are so much cheaper to open compared to dental, Medical or just about any other kind of professional school.

the problem is, technology has enabled medicine and the other things to specialize more heavily today and means one lawyer can do the work 20 lawyers did 20 years ago.

however, there's only one top 100 Law School in Knoxville Tennessee, and everyone I know who graduated is doing pretty good. Working long hours, but not a one is going to make under 60,000 dollars this year, other than the ones who started their own practice right out of the gate, they could.


But the truth is, and anyone who has done both will tell you this, law school is quite a bit harder than medical school. I've met several people with md and jd behind their names. That's what each has said.
 
Last edited:
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
then why did rawn pawl claim authorship of those newsletters in 1996, before later denying authorship of those newsletters?

you haven't met a racist yet that you didn't love.
Click to expand...
he did not claim authorship, he refused to try and distance himself from that shit, because he thought he would look like an asshole lying opportunist.

he made it clear, he didnt write it, but failed to stop that shit from coming out under his name.

theres a HUGE difference.
it's called taking responsibility for your fuckups.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
he did not claim authorship, he refused to try and distance himself from that shit, because he thought he would look like an asshole lying opportunist.

he made it clear, he didnt write it, but failed to stop that shit from coming out under his name.

theres a HUGE difference.
it's called taking responsibility for your fuckups.
Click to expand...
you are a retard.

check the houston chronicle, may 23 1996, page A23. he certainly did defend writing them.

only later did he deny writing them.
 
MidwesternGro

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
But the truth is, and anyone who has done both will tell you this, law school is quite a bit harder than medical school. I've met several people with md and jd behind their names. That's what each has said.
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHA! The chemistry and physics undergrad prerequisites for medical school are tougher than all of law school. You either know it or you don't, and you have to know it very well to build upon it during the next semester. It's not like some bullshit philosophy class.

Do you really think that going to some third-tier toilet law school is harder than med school? rofl.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
further defenses of the newsletters by rawn pawl himself can be found in roll call (7/29/1996) and in the austin american statesman in 1996.

woooooooops.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
further defenses of the newsletters by rawn pawl himself can be found in roll call (7/29/1996) and in the austin american statesman in 1996.

woooooooops.
Click to expand...
but unlike robert byrd, dr paul doesnt get the benefit of the doubt when he makes a later statement to clarify his involvement in a newsletter scandal far less outre' than being the Grand Cyclops of the Klan.

your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
 
MidwesternGro

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
but unlike robert byrd, dr paul doesnt get the benefit of the doubt when he makes a later statement to clarify his involvement in a newsletter scandal far less outre' than being the Grand Cyclops of the Klan.

your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Click to expand...
They can both eat shit and die. Oh wait, Byrd is already dead. Why keep bringing up the dead guy?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
but unlike robert byrd, dr paul doesnt get the benefit of the doubt when he makes a later statement to clarify his involvement in a newsletter scandal far less outre' than being the Grand Cyclops of the Klan.

your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Click to expand...
woah, let's take a look at your comparison here.

roberty byrd does some shady racist shit, owns up to it, tells the truth about it, and apologizes for it.

rawn pawl does some shady racist shit, profits from it, owns up to it, then lies about, then tells a new lie about it, then tells a new lie about it, then never apologizes for it.

these two things are similar because...why?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MidwesternGro said:
They can both eat shit and die. Oh wait, Byrd is already dead. Why keep bringing up the dead guy?
Click to expand...
beating a dead horse will have to do until he gets his own room (projected date of own room: ages 58-59 or so) and can beat his diminutive member in peace.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
woah, let's take a look at your comparison here.

roberty byrd does some shady racist shit, owns up to it, tells the truth about it, and apologizes for it.

rawn pawl does some shady racist shit, profits from it, owns up to it, then lies about, then tells a new lie about it, then tells a new lie about it, then never apologizes for it.

these two things are similar because...why?
Click to expand...


opinion based distinctions without difference, except your agenda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top