Wag The Dog - Random Political and News Jibber Jabber

Doer

Well-Known Member
More Jibber Jabber.

SCOTUS runs this show. Unlike everywhere else we have a true Fuck THAT, Judiciary.

They are co-equal in power and the only ones, that are for life, above the Politics.

No where else. Not Commonweath, not France, not Germany.

What did they do for WE PEOPLE lately?

http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2013/06/scorecard-eight-june-supreme-court-decisions-with-wide-ranging-impacts/

Chief Justice John Roberts says in a 5-4 decision that the petitioners who sought the reaffirm California’s Proposition 8 didn’t have the legal ability to appeal a lower court decision.

Justice Anthony Kennedy said in a 5-4 decision in United States v. Windsor that the federal law known as DOMA deprived the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Constitution.

A divided court allows warrantless DNA swabbing for people arrested under probable cause in felony crimes.

The Court says a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but synthetic cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring.

The court ruled in a 5-3 decision that financial deals between drug makers that hold patents and potential generic competitors could be challenged in court—but one case at a time.

In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council, the court sided with the federal government, saying that Arizona’s evidence-of-citizenship requirement is pre-empted by the federal National Voter Registration Act.

The court rules in a 7-1 vote against how University of Texas’ affirmative action policy was considered by a lower court, and sends the case back to court, avoiding a sweeping decision on affirmative action.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a key part of the historic Voting Rights Act of 1965, sending the section that determines which states need extra attention about discrimination back to Congress to be re-written.

Chief Justice John Roberts says in a 5-4 decision that the petitioners who sought the reaffirm California’s Proposition 8 didn’t have the legal ability to appeal a lower court decision.

--------------------------------------------------------------
And then the ones last week and this.

Good court, Nice Job.
 
Last edited:

Doer

Well-Known Member
And as we go back it time, it is even better.

SCOTUS is the USA Fuck Yeah!

1944 - Korematsu v. United States - The Court ruled Executive Order 9066, internment of Japanese citizens during World War II, is legal, 6-3 for the United States.
1961 - Mapp v. Ohio - "Fruit of the poisonous tree," evidence obtained through an illegal search cannot be used at trial, 6-3 for Mapp.

1967 - Loving v. Virginia - Prohibition against interracial marriage was ruled unconstitutional, 9-0 for Loving.

2008 - District of Columbia v. Heller - The Second Amendment does protect the individual's right to bear arms, 5-4 for Heller.

2010 - Citizens United v. FEC - The Court rules corporations can contribute to PACs under the First Amendment's right to free speech, 5-4 for Citizens United.
 
Last edited:

Doer

Well-Known Member
And before that, even better.

Why? There was only one way to get all the stuff of freedom we take for granted.
These silly monkeys, the earthlings called human, are vicious and will try to enslave everyone unless right minded people appeal for REASON. But, the cute trick is it STICKS.

1978 - Regents of the U. of California v. Bakke
This decision ruled that race cannot be the only factor in college admissions.

1974 - United States v. Nixon
This decision established that executive privilege is neither absolute nor unqualified.

1973 - Roe v. Wade
This decision the right to privacy extends to include a woman's right to choose pregnancy or abortion.

1966 - Miranda v. Arizona
The decision established the rights of suspects against self-incrimination.

1964 - New York Times v. Sullivan
This decision upheld the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

1963 - Gideon v. Wainwright
This decision guarantees the right to counsel.

1954 - Brown v. Board of Education
This decision overturned Plessy v. Ferguson and granted equal protection under the law.

1896 - Plessy v. Ferguson
This decision established the rule of segregation, separate but equal.

1803 - Marbury v. Madison
This decision established the system of checks and balances and the power of the Supreme Court within the federal government.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/21/us/top-u-s-supreme-court-decisions-fast-facts/
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
There must be still a bug in RIU, Alex. Some of my ignored I see that they post, but don't see the message. That's the old ignores.

And then, for the new ignores like SkunkMan, I don't even see the post.

NOT GOOD.
 

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
There must be still a bug in RIU, Alex. Some of my ignored I see that they post, but don't see the message. That's the old ignores.

And then, for the new ignores like SkunkMan, I don't even see the post.

NOT GOOD.
I tried that! Unfortunately the forum browsing application I use has one major flaw, it displays ignored messages. :(
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
There must be still a bug in RIU, Alex. Some of my ignored I see that they post, but don't see the message. That's the old ignores.

And then, for the new ignores like SkunkMan, I don't even see the post.

NOT GOOD.

So I take it you won't be calling me fat anymore?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
has anyone seen "Her" with joaquin phoenix?

it's about a man who falls in love with his operating system that has artificial intelligence.

the film feel is of a cross between "Melancholia" and "Blue Valentine".

set in the "near" future.

i know joaquin is supposed to be "nerdy" but the moustache comes off more pedo-like.

good movie..good messages.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
has anyone seen "Her" with joaquin phoenix?

it's about a man who falls in love with his operating system that has artificial intelligence.

the film feel is of a cross between "Melancholia" and "Blue Valentine".

set in the "near" future.

i know joaquin is supposed to be "nerdy" but the moustache comes off more pedo-like.

good movie..good messages.

Reported.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
has anyone seen "Her" with joaquin phoenix?

it's about a man who falls in love with his operating system that has artificial intelligence.

the film feel is of a cross between "Melancholia" and "Blue Valentine".

set in the "near" future.

i know joaquin is supposed to be "nerdy" but the moustache comes off more pedo-like.

good movie..good messages.
You can fall for her

But she can't really care


What is new about that?

<sigh>
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
More Jibber Jabber.

SCOTUS runs this show. Unlike everywhere else we have a true Fuck THAT, Judiciary.

They are co-equal in power and the only ones, that are for life, above the Politics.

No where else. Not Commonweath, not France, not Germany.

What did they do for WE PEOPLE lately?

http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2013/06/scorecard-eight-june-supreme-court-decisions-with-wide-ranging-impacts/

Chief Justice John Roberts says in a 5-4 decision that the petitioners who sought the reaffirm California’s Proposition 8 didn’t have the legal ability to appeal a lower court decision.

Justice Anthony Kennedy said in a 5-4 decision in United States v. Windsor that the federal law known as DOMA deprived the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Constitution.

A divided court allows warrantless DNA swabbing for people arrested under probable cause in felony crimes.

The Court says a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but synthetic cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring.

The court ruled in a 5-3 decision that financial deals between drug makers that hold patents and potential generic competitors could be challenged in court—but one case at a time.

In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council, the court sided with the federal government, saying that Arizona’s evidence-of-citizenship requirement is pre-empted by the federal National Voter Registration Act.

The court rules in a 7-1 vote against how University of Texas’ affirmative action policy was considered by a lower court, and sends the case back to court, avoiding a sweeping decision on affirmative action.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a key part of the historic Voting Rights Act of 1965, sending the section that determines which states need extra attention about discrimination back to Congress to be re-written.

Chief Justice John Roberts says in a 5-4 decision that the petitioners who sought the reaffirm California’s Proposition 8 didn’t have the legal ability to appeal a lower court decision.

--------------------------------------------------------------
And then the ones last week and this.

Good court, Nice Job.
have you noticed in these cases that the dissent is always female and liberal?

when will these old farty men die already?
 
Last edited:

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
have you noticed in these cases that the dissent is always female and liberal?

when will these old farty men die already?
maybe the women and People Who Are Colored can just burn them at the stake. white men is what you meant.

when the shit jumps off, I'll certainly join the male snow-beasts in their pogrom. I'll have the People Who Are Colored pick my indigo, and you bitches can weave me shirts. there is no room for neutrals........that wish to survive the partisan destruction of America. so, nappy heads, mounted on the wall, with a harem of concubines it is.
 
Top