dont give a shit what the whitewashes claim, i read that shit myself, and if my GC did that kind of shit on a kitchen remodel i would have him in court, and his license would be yanked.
yeah Upenn's "independent investigations" are so thorough and trustworthy, sandusky was "exonerated shortly before the feds clapped him in irons.
"97% consensus" is a talking point created by a long since discredited "meta-study" (the weakest kind of study) from a HISTORY TEACHER which only examined the abstracts of published papers, drew faulty conclusions, and eventually was plagiarized by Cook.
the "97% consensus" is pure bullshit, as i have demonstrated before, but as usual you pretend that shit never happened, then you ran off to make a new thread.
this is where you pretend i never cited that shit...
now explain why the "unprecedented" warming is so clearly precedented, how deliberately undermining the peer revirew system, and attempting to stifle reseach that isnt Mann approved, trying (and failing) to blackball journals because they wouldnt submit to Mann's demand for pre-approval of all their materials, the missing data, the un-reporducable conclusions, and the illogical assumptions are "good science" suitable fro the creation of a "consensus"
this is where you declare "citation needed" despite having been provided with those citations previously
also explain why the shrill caterwauls of dolts like yourself and al gore are never corrected by the "Climate Change Proponents" (~Michael Mann), but if you question the spelling in a lefty global warming hysteric's blog, shitheels like you pour out of the woodwork with cries of "Climate Denier" flying from spittle flecked lips, and Mike Mann and the Earth First Band start shouting about "The Baddies" infiltrating scientific journals.
this is where you pretend that i didnt link you directly to thos emails, from 4 different sources, including wikileaks, not just the "suspect" websites run by "The Baddies"
then explain why 12000 years of actual dramatic warming dont count, but the last 100 years are super important despite being a relatively mild period of both warming AND cooling trends...
Psst... this is the part where you pretend i have never provided you with a link to a "Peer Reviewed" paper that demonstrated large and sudden swings in temp during the (allegedly imaginary) last interglacial.
next, detail how well established scientific theories like the milenkovik cycles, previous glaciations, previous interglacials, previous CO2 spikes without warming, and previous warming without CO2 spikes which call into question many parts of the "Global Warming" narrative are all fictional
this is where you declare "i cant prove any of that shit" and try to argue that dinosaurs, megafauna, and the last ice age never actually existed
yep.
you are totally "owning me" with your Facts that are made up of Facts, by dint of their Factiness.
demonstrating that you dont know what the fuck youre talking about, and your declarations fo "consensus" are bullshit, and your claims that "The Science Is Settled" doesnt make me a "Climate Denier", it makes me a "Toby Denier"
if some papers are published tomorrow that shows Mann et all's shit IS reporducable, and their conclusions are NOT just politically motivated claptrap by some Climate 419 scammers who wanna chop my dollar, i can accept this new data and change my position.
you have already lept onto the bandwagon for all the wrong reasons, and are thus not a credible source for opinions on the subject.
if Denying Toby is wrong, i dont wanna be right.
