Way to continue to erode our rights Republican judges

ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
4 out of 4, actually.

remember, scalia (that fat racist fuck) is dead, Dog be praised.

i'm still partying about that.
Click to expand...
I was including all of the fucking fuckers who voted for it. I'm not letting the Democrat off the hook for this, either.

You still sure you won't vote for Bernie?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
she would appoint liberal judges you uneducated POS
Click to expand...
I've been thinking about it and I'm just not sure I can agree with you on this. She has always been willing to shill to the money. No bigger prize than getting your man on the bench, so I'm thinking not so liberal.

I mean, why would she? It would be out of character with her stated policy positions, campaign donor's wishes and hard to get past a conservative Senate.

She is NOT a progressive, so it makes little sense to assume she'd want to install any on the bench.

Have a look;
us2016.png
Show me her liberal side? I'm afraid I can't find it.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
I've been thinking about it and I'm just not sure I can agree with you on this. She has always been willing to shill to the money. No bigger prize than getting your man on the bench, so I'm thinking not so liberal.

I mean, why would she? It would be out of character with her stated policy positions, campaign donor's wishes and hard to get past a conservative Senate.
Click to expand...
she would appoint more kagans and sotomayors. liberals.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
@UncleBuck I just read that Sylvia Earle endorses Hillary Clinton.

You know what you could show me that could even go so far as to get me to vote for her?

If you care to...

Show that she will contribute to healthier oceans and environs, significantly reduce CO2 emissions, and also, probably more importantly, to increase CO2 sequestration with something along the lines of protecting vital ecosystems such as reefs and/or rainforests, somewhere in the world, preferably on a large scale. Convince me of that, and I don't give a fuck how many radical leftists ridicule me for supporting her. I don't think you can convince me she won't be status quo on foreign policy, but you can try that too if ya want.

That would be worth a thread imo.
 
Last edited:
bluntmassa1

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
The only candidate who has room to talk is the one barnstorming the country saying, 'I TOLD you so!' Americans hate to hear that. That irritating guy would be Bernie Sanders.

But I bet you aren't voting for him, either.
Click to expand...
I already voted for Bernie if Hillary goes to prison yeah I will vote Bernie otherwise the next best option is Gary Johnson. Feel the Johnson! :bigjoint:
 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
I already voted for Bernie if Hillary goes to prison yeah I will vote Bernie otherwise the next best option is Gary Johnson. Feel the Johnson! :bigjoint:
Click to expand...
Hillary isn't going to prison, and voting for Sanders/Johnson is literally throwing your vote away.

Does anyone remember how many votes Ron Paul got? Yeah, me neither.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no you don't, you vote for the very people who appointed those republican judges you fascist retard.
Click to expand...
Who appointed the judges? I highly doubt I voted for the presidents responsible.

I have voted 2 or 3 times. One was for governor.

I am powerful and it scares you. My whims determine the fate of this nation.

. :roll:
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
@UncleBuck I just read that Sylvia Earle endorses Hillary Clinton.

You know what you could show me that could even go so far as to get me to vote for her?

If you care to...

Show that she will contribute to healthier oceans and environs, significantly reduce CO2 emissions, and also, probably more importantly, to increase CO2 sequestration with something along the lines of protecting vital ecosystems such as reefs and/or rainforests, somewhere in the world, preferably on a large scale. Convince me of that, and I don't give a fuck how many radical leftists ridicule me for supporting her. I don't think you can convince me she won't be status quo on foreign policy, but you can try that too if ya want.

That would be worth a thread imo.
Click to expand...
A "Convince me to vote Hillary" thread?

Buck already started one.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
A "Convince me to vote Hillary" thread?

Buck already started one.
Click to expand...
No, a "vote for this person because of their environmental devotion" thread. It would start a discussion on who is the best candidate on what I consider the most important issue. I'm not alone by any means in regards to this priority issue. Comparison to other candidates on the issue would not be limited.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
No, a "vote for this person because of their environmental devotion" thread. It would start a discussion on who is the best candidate on what I consider the most important issue. I'm not alone by any means in regards to this priority issue. Comparison to other candidates on the issue would not be limited.
Click to expand...
It's hard to take care of the environment if you bankrupt the nation.

Not saying environmentalism is cause of that. If you look at the congressional budget office's forecast for our national debt (not deficit)it is easy to see we are in trouble.

I think reducing our debt should be issue #1.

That being said, I dont see why we couldn't have the government invest in our updating our energy grid to be more efficient. Replacing old lines for more efficient ones and placing devices that eliminate energy loss would be a large nationwide project that would provide jobs and income for years.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that electricity transmission and distribution losses average about 6% of the electricity that is transmitted and distributed annually in the United States.1

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/the-u-s-power-grid-is-in-need-of-a-technology-upgrade/
 
P

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so 4 republicans are blameless for voting for this piece of shit, but the one democrat out of 4 who did is the one who you choose to go on a crusade against?

partisan hack much?
Click to expand...
Show me anywhere I've been a partisan hack. Do you understand what the term "partisan" even means? Show me where I've ever supported any political party or politician.

I'm simply pointing out the obvious fact that this decision was 5 to 3. And one of those 5 was a liberal Justice appointed by Clinton. That's not being partisan. That's understanding simple 1st grade arithmetic.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
pabloesqobar said:
Show me anywhere I've been a partisan hack. Do you understand what the term "partisan" even means? Show me where I've ever supported any political party or politician.

I'm simply pointing out the obvious fact that this decision was 5 to 3. And one of those 5 was a liberal Justice appointed by Clinton. That's not being partisan. That's understanding simple 1st grade arithmetic.
Click to expand...
Totally true. Clinton appointee was the one who flipped.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top