OGEvilgenius
Well-Known Member
Sorry bro, facts are facts and you don't have them. And if you think that these "freedom fighters" weren't assured they would receive massive assistance before embarking on their campaign then you aren't really thinking.dude, you have no credibility. The history you claim is neither as I remember or what is available from multiple credible sources. I don't dispute the assertion that petro-dollars are the largest driver of US interventionism in the Middle East. Your story line about the Libyan rebellion however is false.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/20/hillary-clinton-state-department-approved-us-weapo/The State Department initially approved a weapons shipment from a California company to Libyans seeking to oust Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 even though a United Nations arms ban was in place, according to memos recovered from the burned-out compound in Benghazi.
The documents, obtained by The Washington Times, show U.S. diplomats at the Benghazi compound were keeping track of several potential U.S.-sanctioned shipments to allies, one or more of which were destined for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to oust Gadhafi and form a new government.