Hillary can't be trusted

Status
Not open for further replies.

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Ya or there's this Jewish, Austria German Economist with a phD in Law guy who actually fled the German advance in Europe during the first year of WWII:

"De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

But what specifically established de facto socialism in Nazi Germany was the introduction of price and wage controls in 1936. These were imposed in response to the inflation of the money supply carried out by the regime from the time of its coming to power in early 1933. The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament. The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation.

As Mises showed, to cope with such unintended effects of its price controls, the government must either abolish the price controls or add further measures, namely, precisely the control over what is produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it is distributed, which I referred to earlier. The combination of price controls with this further set of controls constitutes the de facto socialization of the economic system. For it means that the government then exercises all of the substantive powers of ownership.

This was the socialism instituted by the Nazis. And Mises calls it socialism on the German or Nazi pattern, in contrast to the more obvious socialism of the Soviets, which he calls socialism on the Russian or Bolshevik pattern."
gay-bdsm-male-slaves.jpg
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't want your car.

Dude, the industrialist owners maintained ownership of their factories. On a war footing in the modern era, all economies are directed by the war time government. Same thing happened during WW1 on both sides of the conflict. Hitler had his country on a war footing earlier than 1939 as part of his plans to expand the territories of the German race while exterminating Jewish, Slavic and other Eastern European people in order to make room for his people's expansion, is that what's confusing you?
Not really. What's confusing is why you're trying to equate a "war footing" and who controlled what in Germany after the war was over as some reasoning that aggressive Socalism did not take place by Hitler in Germany. The big difference here is the US armed forces are purely voluntary btw.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
so he executed other parties, like socialists, because they did not go along with him and his socialism?

you are motherfucking retarded.
He exterminated Russian Bolshevik Socialism in Germany and waged war on Capitalism and the 1% Remind me who was that 1% again?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
so reading and comprehension are tough for you? figures.

did you and Pie go the same school by chance?
I went to a school that does not condone plagiarism if that's what you mean. Lemme guess, you went to a school where a numerical grade of 60 is still passing.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
and if you were to ever get a job and become a tax payer, you could actually help in that effort.

as it stands, you are standing on the sidelines, taking welfare from taxpaying workers like myself, and telling us what to do with the rest of our money.
And what exactly is wrong with taking something that was offered to you?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ya or there's this Jewish, Austria German Economist with a phD in Law guy who actually fled the German advance in Europe during the first year of WWII:

"De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

But what specifically established de facto socialism in Nazi Germany was the introduction of price and wage controls in 1936. These were imposed in response to the inflation of the money supply carried out by the regime from the time of its coming to power in early 1933. The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament. The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation.

As Mises showed, to cope with such unintended effects of its price controls, the government must either abolish the price controls or add further measures, namely, precisely the control over what is produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it is distributed, which I referred to earlier. The combination of price controls with this further set of controls constitutes the de facto socialization of the economic system. For it means that the government then exercises all of the substantive powers of ownership.

This was the socialism instituted by the Nazis. And Mises calls it socialism on the German or Nazi pattern, in contrast to the more obvious socialism of the Soviets, which he calls socialism on the Russian or Bolshevik pattern."
mises is a hack.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Ok, so when Comey comes out to say that nothing is there, will you buy it? I'll buy it if he says Clinton comitted a crime. Will you accept his decision if he says she didn't or that he finds nothing that merits charges?
Do you accept that JFK was killed by a magic bullet? Do you accept that US citizens were kidnapped and used as LSD test subjects
Trump pays 0% tax remember
Hideously ignorant.

You havent got time to read? Why you're busy gooning with enema. over FBI fantasies?
You don't take tax deductions. You volunteer above and beyond your tax obligation, got it.
Would you like the link to voluntarily contribute to the Treasury? I believe in you, you could provide us with so much more....
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
I agree. Your wife should know if you are sleeping around with men....or women for that matter.
I myself don't prefer men, but I will not knock you for your preference. In fact I say you should embrace it. Think about if you would prefer bottom or top and go for it. Let us know how it went. Good luck
"I know you are but what am I". The tried and true elementary school burn still works.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Do you accept that JFK was killed by a magic bullet? Do you accept that US citizens were kidnapped and used as LSD test subjects


You don't take tax deductions. You volunteer above and beyond your tax obligation, got it.
Would you like the link to voluntarily contribute to the Treasury? I believe in you, you could provide us with so much more....
Regarding JFK, I don't know. Its as simple as that. I haven't seen anything that convinces me one way or the other. There is also a rumor of a second shooter in the Lincoln assassination too. Maybe the second shooter is the same guy. I'm aware of CIA testing LSD on unwitting test subjects. That's pretty old stuff. Did you know that the CIA and military staff tortured people during the Iraq war?

What in hell are you getting at? Get to the point, man.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Regarding JFK, I don't know. Its as simple as that. I haven't seen anything that convinces me one way or the other. There is also a rumor of a second shooter in the Lincoln assassination too. Maybe the second shooter is the same guy. I'm aware of CIA testing LSD on unwitting test subjects. That's pretty old stuff. Did you know that the CIA and military staff tortured people during the Iraq war?

What in hell are you getting at? Get to the point, man.
IDK I'm very high. I saw a pretty good documentary that linked JFK assassination to Bush Sr. who claimed to have never worked for the FBI, but did at the time. Ya I've seen some of the Iraq torture, never heard of the 2nd gunman on Lincoln, got a link? IIRC you were trying to make a case that Nazi Germany was Capitalist because potato. Imma go smoke another bowl.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
IDK I'm very high. I saw a pretty good documentary that linked JFK assassination to Bush Sr. who claimed to have never worked for the FBI, but did at the time. Ya I've seen some of the Iraq torture, never heard of the 2nd gunman on Lincoln, got a link? IIRC you were trying to make a case that Nazi Germany was Capitalist because potato. Imma go smoke another bowl.
sounds like a good idea.

THEORY #1
ANDREW JOHNSON WAS INVOLVED WITH BOOTH


Approximately seven hours before shooting the president, Booth dropped by the Washington hotel which was Vice-President Andrew Johnson's residence. Upon learning from the desk clerk that neither Johnson nor his private secretary, William A. Browning, was in the hotel, Booth wrote the following note: "Don't wish to disturb you Are you at home? J. Wilkes Booth." Browning testified before the military court that he found the note in his box later that afternoon.

Did Johnson and Booth know each other? In the 1997 publication "Right or Wrong, God Judge Me" The Writings of John Wilkes Booth edited by John Rhodehamel and Louise Taper it is stated on p. 146 that Booth had previously met Johnson in Nashville in February, 1864. At the time Booth was appearing in the newly opened Wood's Theatre. Also, author Hamilton Howard in Civil War Echoes (1907) made the claim that while Johnson was military governor of Tennessee, he and Booth kept a couple of sisters as mistresses and oftentimes were seen in each other's company.

A lot more theories are listed here:
http://rogerjnorton.com/Lincoln74.html

There is a conspiracy theory for every damn bad thing that has ever happened. People find it hard to believe that one person acting alone can cause so much harm and so they look for other reasons. Many times, it's true, the perp acted alone or with a very small group. Like 9-11. But people don't want to think that it is true.

My initial response is always "say what". I'll usually check it out and it's almost always not true or stretched beyond recognition. Some conspiracies are true but they aren't secret for long. The CIA LSD thing is an example. Same with nuclear tests that exposed rank and file soldiers to bomb blast radiation just to see what happens. And they died. Usually the attempt to hide it makes it look worse and engenders wild speculation by weak minded people.

After all this time, I find it hard to believe that a massive conspiracy to kill JFK could be kept secret for so long.


In today's world, nothing remains a secret. Nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top