so ummm... flynn wants his freedom?

[schuylaar]

This is proof positive that a business man cannot run the government.

That question has been asked over and over.

So we learned two big things.

The EC doesn't work as Hamilton planned which is why we should get rid of it..no other democracy on earth has it, either.

Business people don't do government well, so STFU and stop saying they'll do a better job than politician.

Now we know, finally two burning questions answered.

Now what are we gonna DO about it?

 

[Unclebaldrick]

i've started watching documentaries about watergate these last few days.

this is far worse.

Way.

 

[dandyrandy]

I was in the military when tricky dick went down. I believe this will undo the repubs for some. I'm sure they are involved in the cover up. The Kool aid drinkers won't believe. It's Obama's fault.

 

[SneekyNinja]

Is party more important than Justice?

If that idea prevails, it's the end of our democracy.

Congratulations.

You've become a far left Rob "One Trick Pony" Roy.

 

[ttystikk]

Congratulations.

You've become a far left Rob "One Trick Pony" Roy.

Wrong in every way, Stinkydigit.

 

[SneekyNinja]

Wrong in every way, Stinkydigit.

Rob Roy's Playbook:

•Make an entirely ideological based claim
•Decline to comment on citations that directly counter your philosophy
•Insult intelligence of people who disagree
•Arrogantly declare victory when it's plainly obvious to everyone except you that you're wrong

You're 4 for 4 there, bud.

At least I'll admit when I'm wrong and change my view when presented facts proving the contrary, alot of people here can even attest to that.

You have that MAGA supporter arrogance thats just super annoying.

You should change it though and be less absolutist, you make good points alot of the time but inevitably fall back to the Rob Roy system after a while.

Seriously, think logically for a second. Trump and the Republicans are in a historic state of meltdown and you're trying to divide Democrats rather than shifting opinion gently like Sanders did.

 

[ttystikk]

Rob Roy's Playbook:

•Make an entirely ideological based claim
•Decline to comment on citations that directly counter your philosophy
•Insult intelligence of people who disagree
•Arrogantly declare victory when it's plainly obvious to everyone except you that you're wrong

You're 4 for 4 there, bud.

At least I'll admit when I'm wrong and change my view when presented facts proving the contrary, alot of people here can even attest to that.

You have that MAGA supporter arrogance thats just super annoying.

You should change it though and be less absolutist, you make good points alot of the time but inevitably fall back to the Rob Roy system after a while.

Seriously, think logically for a second. Trump and the Republicans are in a historic state of meltdown and you're trying to divide Democrats rather than shifting opinion gently like Sanders did.

While you've been busy trying to pound square pegs into round holes, I voted for Bernie. I was in the 5:1 majority.

I'm a Sandernista, through and through.

But keep pounding, Stinkydigit.

 

[SneekyNinja]

While you've been busy trying to pound square pegs into round holes, I voted for Bernie. I was in the 5:1 majority.

I'm a Sandernista, through and through.

But keep pounding, Stinkydigit.

So why do you disagree with everything he did? Lol.

5 to 1?

Why'd he lose by so much?

(She cheated!)

And you're back to the Rob Roy Method again, "Ill keep repeating it and hope someone believes me"

 

[mr sunshine]

'When you are given immunity, that means you've probably committed a crime'

 

[Unclebaldrick]

'When you are given immunity, that means you've probably committed a crime'

Who said that?

 

[mr sunshine]

Who said that?

It was Flynn.

 

[HAF2]

“When you are given immunity, that means you probably committed a crime,”
- Michael Flynn

“The reason they get immunity is because they did something wrong. If they didn’t do anything wrong, they don’t think in terms of immunity. If you are not guilty of a crime, what do you need immunity for? Right.”
- Donald Trump

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/03/31/michael-flynn-in-2016-immunity-means-you-probably-committed-a-crime/

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
Mike Flynn should ask for immunity in that this is a witch hunt (excuse for big election loss), by media & Dems, of historic proportion!

7:04 AM - 31 Mar 2017

 

[Sir Napsalot]

This gets crazier by the day. The garment may begin the unraveling process now... gotta think there are trumpers out there feeling awful uneasy on the inside...

That would require a degree of insight which they do not possess.

 

[mr sunshine]

Rest, in ,piss

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Lol, Limbaugh is hitting the weak sauce on air today. His only claim is that he says there is no proof that Flynn has talked to or asked for immunity from the House or Senate and then brought up Hillary's email server. Fake news!

Lol. I guess you bitches will have to wait for later to find out why this is a good thing.

He did say that Trump tweeted agreement that he thinks Flynn should ask for immunity from prosecution though, so he obviously knows nothing bad happened.

Sad.

Is Kelly Anne still on the roster? If so they might be dragging her out over the weekend.

 

[dandyrandy]

Piss Tapes

 

[ttystikk]

So why do you disagree with everything he did? Lol.

5 to 1?

Why'd he lose by so much?

(She cheated!)

And you're back to the Rob Roy Method again, "Ill keep repeating it and hope someone believes me"

I voted for Bernie. He won my precinct by a 5:1 margin.

As usual, you're completely backwards on everything here, Stinkydigit. Do you even read?

 

[twostrokenut]

So here is the letter from Flynn's lawyer that the WSJ derived its story from:


"Counsel to Lt. General Mike Flynn (Retired)

General Flynn certainly has a story to tell, and he very much wants to tell it, should the circumstances permit.

Out of respect for the Committees, we will not comment right now on the details of discussions between counsel for General Flynn and the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, other than to confirm that those discussions have taken place. But it is important to acknowledge the circumstances in which those discussions are occurring.

General Flynn is a highly decorated 33-year veteran of the U.S. Army. He devoted most of his life to serving his country, spending many years away from his family fighting this nation's battles around the world. He was awarded four Bronze Stars for actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere in the war on terror. He received the Legion of Merit twice, and the Defense Superior Service Medal four times. He is a recipient of the Defense Department's Distinguished Service Award and the Intelligence Community Gold Seal Medallion for Distinguished Service, as well as numerous other decorations.

Notwithstanding his life of national service, the media are awash with unfounded allegations, outrageous claims of treason, and vicious innuendo directed against him. He is now the target of unsubstantiated public demands by Members of Congress and other political critics that he be criminally investigated. No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch hunt environment without assurances against unfair prosecution.

h/t @ChuckRossDC"

Looks like a request for an environment that would assure against "unfair prosecution" not immunity.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

So here is the letter from Flynn's lawyer that the WSJ derived its story from:


"Counsel to Lt. General Mike Flynn (Retired)

General Flynn certainly has a story to tell, and he very much wants to tell it, should the circumstances permit.

Out of respect for the Committees, we will not comment right now on the details of discussions between counsel for General Flynn and the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, other than to confirm that those discussions have taken place. But it is important to acknowledge the circumstances in which those discussions are occurring.

General Flynn is a highly decorated 33-year veteran of the U.S. Army. He devoted most of his life to serving his country, spending many years away from his family fighting this nation's battles around the world. He was awarded four Bronze Stars for actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere in the war on terror. He received the Legion of Merit twice, and the Defense Superior Service Medal four times. He is a recipient of the Defense Department's Distinguished Service Award and the Intelligence Community Gold Seal Medallion for Distinguished Service, as well as numerous other decorations.

Notwithstanding his life of national service, the media are awash with unfounded allegations, outrageous claims of treason, and vicious innuendo directed against him. He is now the target of unsubstantiated public demands by Members of Congress and other political critics that he be criminally investigated. No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch hunt environment without assurances against unfair prosecution.

h/t @ChuckRossDC"

Looks like a request for an environment that would assure against "unfair prosecution" not immunity.

 

[twostrokenut]

Just in case no one has read it. No skin off my ass either way but counsel certainly knows what the word immunity means, yet its not present anywhere.