G.V
Well-Known Member
I have actually asked before, but I was stoned to death through my PC screen. So maybe I can try again.
But is the argument of LED produced Cannabis being better than that of HPS produced Cannabis based on the fact LED's have a much better spectrum?
Because if this is the case HID has come a long way since the days of magnetic ballasts and basic HPS bulb. CMH has a spectacular spectrum and is cheaper than QB to set up watt for watt.
Comparing HPS to QB / COB technology is slightly unfair I think, is that not like HID users comparing the old purple cheap LED units claiming to be 600w output to a brand new 600w de hps Gavita? Just different leagues.
Surely a much fairer fight would be QB / COB technology vs CMH?
But is the argument of LED produced Cannabis being better than that of HPS produced Cannabis based on the fact LED's have a much better spectrum?
Because if this is the case HID has come a long way since the days of magnetic ballasts and basic HPS bulb. CMH has a spectacular spectrum and is cheaper than QB to set up watt for watt.
Comparing HPS to QB / COB technology is slightly unfair I think, is that not like HID users comparing the old purple cheap LED units claiming to be 600w output to a brand new 600w de hps Gavita? Just different leagues.
Surely a much fairer fight would be QB / COB technology vs CMH?