War

ANC

Well-Known Member
"In Russia, power is a pyramid. This pyramid was built by Ivan the Terrible in the 16th century – an ambitious, brutal tsar overrun by paranoia and a great many other vices. With the help of his personal army – the oprichnina – he cruelly and bloodily divided the Russian state into power and people, friend and foe, and the gap between them became the deepest of moats. His friendship with the Golden Horde convinced him that the only way to rule the hugeness of Russia was by becoming an occupier of this enormous zone. The occupying power had to be strong, cruel, unpredictable, and incomprehensible to the people. The people should have no choice but to obey and worship it. And a single person sits at the peak of this dark pyramid, a single person possessing absolute power and a right to all. "

 

captainmorgan

Well-Known Member
When the USSR collasped russia lost control of all the traditional defensive choke points for land invasion of the old russian empire. The shirtless midget is determined to get them back, he's already gotten a couple of them. In a age of high tech warfare with stealth planes,missiles and drones this seems like a huge mistake, occupation these days only happens after a enemy is basically destroyed with air power. If russia is worried about a land invasion it wont come from europe or the middle east, it will come from china, they have the population size for a ground war to take territory on their continent.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Belarus holds constitutional vote as crisis in Ukraine rages
Belarusians cast ballots Sunday in a constitutional referendum that the country’s authoritarian leader called to cement his 27-year old grip on power, even as he offers the country’s territory to his ally Russia to invade Ukraine.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, who has edged even closer to Russia amid crippling Western sanctions over his crackdown on domestic protests, said he was confident that Belarusians will support a set of constitutional amendments that would allow him to stay in power until 2035.

The revised main law also sheds Belarus’ neutral status, opening the way for stronger military cooperation with Russia, which deployed forces to Belarusian territory under the pretext of military drills and then sent them rolling into Ukraine as part of the invasion that began Thursday.

Some of those forces quickly closed in on the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, located just 75 kilometers (less than 50 miles) south of the border.

In a video message Sunday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy rebuked Belarusians for allowing their country to be used as a staging ground for the Russian invasion, adding that Ukrainian cities are facing an attack on a scale unseen since World War II when Belarus and Ukraine faced a Nazi invasion as parts of the Soviet Union.

“But you aren’t on the same side with us in the war that is going on now,” Zelenskyy said in Russian, which is widely spoken in Belarus. “The Russian military is launching missiles at Ukraine from your territory. From your territory they are kiling our children, they are destroying our homes and trying to blow up everything that has been built for decades.”

In an emotional speech, the Ukrainian leader questioned how Belarusians will be able “to look into the eyes of your children, into the eyes of each other.”

“We are your neighbors. Be Belarus, not Russia!” he said.

The Belarusian leader quickly shot back, denigrating the Ukrainian president as an American puppet and charging that the Russian attack resulted from Zelenskyy’s failure to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin’s demand for Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO.

The West responded to Belarus hosting Russian troops for the invasion by slamming it with new tough sanctions along with Russia.

Lukashenko ominously warned Sunday that more sanctions from the West are “pushing the world to the brink of World War III.”

The Belarusian leader, who said previously that his country could host Russian nuclear weapons, said that he warned French President Emmanuel Macron in a call Saturday that he was ready to make the move if the U.S. and its allies deploy nuclear weapons to NATO members Poland and Lithuania, which border Belarus.

“We have developed plans to protect Belarus and agreed with Putin to deploy such weapons here that will make Poles and Lithuanians lose any desire to go to war,” he said.

The constitutional amendments bring back limits on presidential terms that had been abolished during Lukashenko’s tenure, allowing a president only two five-year terms in office. However, the restriction will only take effect once a “newly elected president” assumes office, which gives Lukashenko an opportunity to run for two more terms after his current one expires in 2025.

In 2020, Lukashenko relied on Moscow’s support to survive the largest and the most sustained wave of mass protests in the country’s history. Demonstrations, the biggest of which drew up to 200,000 people, were triggered by him winning a sixth term in office in a presidential election in August 2020 that the opposition and the West denounced as rigged.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Nukes are a bluff,he would never use them against NATO or the US unless he's lost touch with reality. I do think he would use them on what he thinks is russian territory to stop a land invasion.
If he used nukes on Ukraine it would be a first class war crime and crime against humanity, he would drink poison tea or eat a bullet back home for it. Everything would be cut off and NATO might go for a no fly zone and UN peace keeping force in Ukraine, Russia would be expelled from the security council, the list of pain is endless.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
If he used nukes on Ukraine it would be a first class war crime and crime against humanity, he would drink poison tea or eat a bullet back home for it. Everything would be cut off and NATO might go for a no fly zone and UN peace keeping force in Ukraine, Russia would be expelled from the security council, the list of pain is endless.
Haven't nukes already been used on Ukraine? Chernobyl.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Haven't nukes already been used on Ukraine? Chernobyl.
That's a power station and nobody knows who breached containment and for what reason, it was a active construction site before the invasion. We are talking about tactical nukes used on resisting cities or even supply routes inside Ukraine. It would be a major war crime and crime against humanity to use them on a non nuclear power that gave up it's nukes in exchange for a security treaty that is now being violated. Russia could lose it place on the security council, even if the UN had to be reconfigured to do it, Vlad would go from the frying pan into the fucking fire!
 
Top