War

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
There is nobody else on the west almost the entire army is encircled in the south east or encircled in the cities hiding among civilians. The only troops coming to the west of Ukraine are the Belorussians from the north
There are 10 million fighting aged males in Ukraine and NATO can scrap up a million quality man army trained in Poland without much problem. Like I said, he's wasting his time with cities and human rights atrocities. War is about concentration of forces at critical points in a timely manner, Vlad failed in this fundamental strategy with his 5 axis attack on cities and failure to cut off Ukraine from the west, that will get harder with each passing day now.

It's like when Hitler started bombing London in WW2 while stopping the attacks on the airfields, allowing the RAF which was on the ropes to recover and the rest is history.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
This is a power shift and everyone noticed, suddenly they are all running around like headless chickens because the bear woke up
We had similar rhetoric among war hawks in the US when we got into the various messes you harken back to. In Iraq invasion and aftermath, about 5,000 US soldiers returned in body bags along with 5,000 coalition soldiers and about a million dead Iraqis and that was only a fraction of the cost to the US. It was horrible and I opposed this war from the beginning. Like Putin did with Ukraine, Shrub (George W Bush) talked as if he expected the Iraqis to welcome the US. Miscalculating the enemy makes for disasters.

So now it seems that Putin is willing to level cities and bomb civilians. How many dead Ukrainian children will Putin's adventure by Putin cost? Is it worth it? What do the people of Russia get from their costs? They already have about 3000 dead.
 

0potato0

Well-Known Member
We had similar rhetoric among war hawks in the US when we got into the various messes you harken back to. In Iraq invasion and aftermath, about 5,000 US soldiers returned in body bags along with 5,000 coalition soldiers and about a million dead Iraqis and that was only a fraction of the cost to the US. It was horrible and I opposed this war from the beginning. Like Putin did with Ukraine, Shrub (George W Bush) talked as if he expected the Iraqis to welcome the US. Miscalculating the enemy makes for disasters.

So now it seems that Putin is willing to level cities and bomb civilians. How many dead Ukrainian children will Putin's adventure by Putin cost? Is it worth it? What do the people of Russia get from their costs? They already have about 3000 dead.
Just google the battle of Grozny Russians learned so much from that.
 

0potato0

Well-Known Member

Apparently, the fighters of an unit of Ukrainian Territorial Defense Forces tried to prepare an ambush against the Russian military in a local park, placing Molotov cocktails near the trees and sitting down to wait, but they were detected and 'destroyed' in advance by the ambushed Russian Forces
On the clothes of the deceased fighters, there are identification marks of combatants.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Just google the battle of Grozny Russians learned so much from that.

The Russian soldiers who entered Grozny in December 1994 did not expect a fight. But for the young men who spent New Year's Eve attacking the city, Grozny - which in Russian means "terrible" or "menacing" - lived up to its name. At the cost of numerous casualties and severe damage to the city, the Russians eventually succeeded, but their victory proved short-lived. Five years later to the day, Russian troops were once again battling rebel forces in Grozny's streets.


Doesn't sound like they learned anything whatsoever.
 
Top