War

schuylaar

Well-Known Member

" There is no evidence suggesting that painkillers such as morphine would prevent endorphins from being produced, however. Pain isn’t always an issue when people die. My own observations and discussions with colleagues suggest that if pain has not really been an issue for a person earlier, it is unusual for it to become a problem during the dying process. We don’t know why that is – it could be related to endorphins. Again, no research has yet been done on this."

https://www.healthline.com/health/pineal-gland-dmt#production

that's an unproven theory...
i looked it up so i didn't have to hear anyone getting scolded for laziness, nor anyone recriminate that they should do their own research...
both unproven, not enough research for a definitive answer, either way.
Unproven to science because once you go through whatever the pineal gland secrets you're usually dead..most people that come back have positive descriptors.

In science..a fact is not a fact until it is.

@cannabineer go back and check my Idaho prediction..I hit them all except for motive which is not being reported as of yet.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I'm trying to help you become self sufficient.
No. You’re being a bull in the china shop of my former profession. When you bring a claim like that, the responsibility to back it up lands squarely on you.

Furthermore, what evidence do you have that I am not self-sufficient? Implying that I am offensively needy, as that does, is possibly an even worse insult.

You’re not having a very good day.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I'm trying to help you become self sufficient.
and he's trying to stop you from parroting unsubstantiated internet bullshit. asking the questions is good, assuming they've already been answered is not.
that whole subject has been very poorly studied, i think mostly because there can never be any verifiable anecdotal evidence, and the difficulty of gathering unbiased information from someone's death. the only circumstances where you could guarantee any recorded data would itself effect the data, the odds of ever gathering any meaningful scientific information from someone's random death are extremely small, the circumstances very rare.
so maybe it do, and maybe it do not...
 
Last edited:

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
and he's trying to stop you from parroting unsubstantiated internet bullshit. asking the questions is good, assuming they've already been answered is not.
that whole subject has been very poorly studied, i think mostly because there can never be any verifiable anecdotal evidence, and the difficulty of gathering unbiased information from someone's death. the only circumstances where you could guarantee any recorded data would itself effect the data, the odds of ever gathering any meaningful scientific information from someones random death are extremely small, the circumstances very rare.
so maybe it do, and maybe it do not...
There is an old cartoon about psychedelic research that underlines the difficulty of doing objective science on them. The clinician holds the wide-eyed rat cupped in his hand and says “so how do you feel?”
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
it occurs to me that the war in Ukraine mirrors the downfall of others....trump, muck, the entire republican party.
seems like it's been a bad year for fascist worldwide, which can only be good for the rest of the world.
Joe and other liberal democratic leaders saw their chance, some sooner than others, to use Vlad's blunder to destroy him and his army. As soon as the new battlefield assessments came in after the war began, the opinion of the experts began to shift from, they can hold them off, to they can beat the shit out of the Russians, if we play our cards right. Austin and Blinken let the cat out of the bag, until Joe told them to STFU! They said the objective was to destroy Russian military power, not merely the defense of Ukraine, but long term historic change.

Putin and Russia have been a pain in the ass for the past 20 years, causing trouble internationally and fucking with elections in liberal democracies using the internet. Vlad's blunder in Ukraine gave Joe just the stick he needed to beat Vlad to death with, while keeping his distance and not getting any shit on himself. It is a bargain in every sense of the word and best of all in a couple of years after the Russians have their asses whipped, are prosecuted in the Hague and then have their money seized, the $50 billion could be paid back with Russian cash. Joe could arrange another visit by Zel before the 2024 election where Zel hands congress a $50 billion dollar check (of Russian money) and a thank you! :lol: So much for wasted money...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Unproven to science because once you go through whatever the pineal gland secrets you're usually dead..most people that come back have positive descriptors.

In science..a fact is not a fact until it is.

@cannabineer go back and check my Idaho prediction..I hit them all except for motive which is not being reported as of yet.
All the evidence says yer dead when yer dead and to believe otherwise is a denial of death, annihilation and to be separate from nature, to be supernatural. We die every night of our lives when we become unconscious, if you never wake up, you'll never know the difference. It is enough perhaps that we are made of stardust and are a very rare part of nature that is aware of it's self and the universe, in some sense. Our entire existence as a species is but the blink of an eye in deep time measured in million or billions of years. Not even our civilization can last forever and the prospect is unrealistic as individuals, even if we turned ourselves into machines, even the universe is finite in terms of existence. It is just our survival instinct run amuck in a frightened and confused mind, ignoring evidence and facts for what they need to believe, or half believe.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Unproven to science because once you go through whatever the pineal gland secrets you're usually dead..most people that come back have positive descriptors.

In science..a fact is not a fact until it is.

@cannabineer go back and check my Idaho prediction..I hit them all except for motive which is not being reported as of yet.
search Idaho prediction: no results

The link would be a courtesy
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
and he's trying to stop you from parroting unsubstantiated internet bullshit. asking the questions is good, assuming they've already been answered is not.
that whole subject has been very poorly studied, i think mostly because there can never be any verifiable anecdotal evidence, and the difficulty of gathering unbiased information from someone's death. the only circumstances where you could guarantee any recorded data would itself effect the data, the odds of ever gathering any meaningful scientific information from someones random death are extremely small, the circumstances very rare.
so maybe it do, and maybe it do not...
Let me know when when achieve the answer.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
search Idaho prediction: no results

The link would be a courtesy
The keywords I used in Search was Idaho; Schuylaar


Very sad I hate when people go crazy but my profile has this killer as:

  • Male
  • Single Act
  • Premeditated
  • They knew him and let him in
  • Student at the College
  • Motive - Jealousy
  • Serrated blade? Without seeing the crime scene yet, I'm thinking killer hacked these people bad.
He'll be in custody soon..too many hidden eyes and cameras everywhere. They'll get tips because he was bloody..someone had to see him walking around- it's a college town.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
All the evidence says yer dead when yer dead and to believe otherwise is a denial of death, annihilation and to be separate from nature, to be supernatural. We die every night of our lives when we become unconscious, if you never wake up, you'll never know the difference. It is enough perhaps that we are made of stardust and are a very rare part of nature that is aware of it's self and the universe, in some sense. Our entire existence as a species is but the blink of an eye in deep time measured in million or billions of years. Not even our civilization can last forever and the prospect is unrealistic as individuals, even if we turned ourselves into machines, even the universe is finite in terms of existence. It is just our survival instinct run amuck in a frightened and confused mind, ignoring evidence and facts for what they need to believe, or half believe.
i have absolutely no idea what happens after the physical body ceases to exist...and neither does anyone else. no one has ever come back from real, undeniable death after more than a few moments, and they've never been able to give a real coherent explanation of the experience, which is of little surprise.
the best estimates are that about 109 Billion homo sapiens have lived and died on earth so far, and there is not one reputable record of a single one communicating from the other side.
but, that does not mean that there is nothing beyond this existence, either. it just means that there hasn't been, and likely never will be, any information available about it on our side of the veil.
 
Top