Stoney McFried
Well-Known Member
Hey..I was thinking....since you're both naked at the same time...does that mean??
Do you believe in God?
- Thread starter icurbyou
- Start date
- Status
Stoney McFried
Well-Known Member
Nah...too much nudity may give the religious a heart attack.Anyway, I'm off to bed.Love ya!
CrackerJax
New Member
Nitey nite.... I hope you sleep naked at least.
Yah NG naked here. When I was a teenager I had a friend whose parents were very progressive and they didn't make a big deal about nudity. Mrs. Douglass was pretty dam hot! Gave me a different perspective on things for the better.
TY Mrs. Douglass, wherever u r!
out.
NewGrowth
Well-Known Member
Night stoney!Nitey nite.... I hope you sleep naked at least.
Yah NG naked here. When I was a teenager I had a friend whose parents were very progressive and they didn't make a big deal about nudity. Mrs. Douglass was pretty dam hot! Gave me a different perspective on things for the better.
TY Mrs. Douglass, wherever u r!
out.
[youtube]Ubcyn0_5GNc[/youtube]
i always like to hear space trivia... like some of what Glassfreak was talking about.
i also heard that the Universe is comprised of approximately 10 percent (materials that we are familiar with) and 90 percent Dark Matter. That means there's a whole lotta shite outside of our normal perceptual limitations. I have also heard that at the center of every single galaxy there is a black hole. (or more) And back when i was still in school (say 15 years ago) they had just discovered that the universe is actually expanding at an -increasing- speed (and perhaps -gaining- in matter/energy). which makes you rethink the whole 'big bang' phenomena in that matter would seem to slow down from being propelled outward by an initial blast, and also makes you rethink the prophesied 'collapse' back toward a single point.
.
i also heard that the Universe is comprised of approximately 10 percent (materials that we are familiar with) and 90 percent Dark Matter. That means there's a whole lotta shite outside of our normal perceptual limitations. I have also heard that at the center of every single galaxy there is a black hole. (or more) And back when i was still in school (say 15 years ago) they had just discovered that the universe is actually expanding at an -increasing- speed (and perhaps -gaining- in matter/energy). which makes you rethink the whole 'big bang' phenomena in that matter would seem to slow down from being propelled outward by an initial blast, and also makes you rethink the prophesied 'collapse' back toward a single point.
.
CrackerJax
New Member
hey that was pretty sweet. Paul looked Horrible with the long hair!!
out.
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
Ever hear of the Oort cloud? Very mysterious outer boundary of our solar system and prevents most of the galactic light from reaching us. If the oort cloud wasn't there, nightime would still be bright as the center of the galaxy would be exposed 24/7 to us....amazing stuff. Think of how big our plants would be!!
out.
icurbyou
Well-Known Member
I was thinking the same thing. It was 'non believers' steadily growing in percentage and then slowly it got closer -- yet no noticeable conversation change or 'pro believers' comments in the thread itself.
Must be a lot of late believers who like to lay low on the comments.
i'll look it up now. but as far as 'boundaries' go... it was my understanding that the radiation emmited by stars/galaxies and such is the same no matter which way you point the device, meaning - we have never discerned any perceivable 'edge'.Ever hear of the Oort cloud? Very mysterious outer boundary of our solar system and prevents most of the galactic light from reaching us. If the oort cloud wasn't there, nightime would still be bright as the center of the galaxy would be exposed 24/7 to us....amazing stuff. Think of how big our plants would be!!
out.
hmm... but i have also heard that the further away you look (toward a far-off galaxy) the further back in time you are actually looking (because it takes the light a specific amount of time to even reach us) ... so conceivably if you looked far enough away... the only thing you would see is the Big Bang itself.
it is tickling to think however that so long as you have ever existed, you will continue to exist forever after, as from some point further out in space ... and further again out in space ... you are always saying or doing exactly what you are saying or doing -right now- (by someone else's perception). IE; our sun's light will always shine forth, even after the sun is long since gone. You would think, for this reason alone, that the universe would be expanding at least at the speed of light. But science and math are not my strong points.
(EDIT) ah, i see what you are saying about that Oort Cloud... hmm, ya it might be diminishing the light that the stars appear to be giving off. Super Bright Stars at night time... that would be some crazy stuff. Having two moons would be pretty cool as well
.
Skate Hawaii
Well-Known Member
makes me think
GlassFreak
Well-Known Member
you guys should look into LHC (Large Hadron Collider) its a way of getting energy out of taking particals of matter and smashing them together, this is basicaly a tiny tiny tiny vertion of the big bang, ann the matter that make up everything was once all jumbled together in 2 masses, when they collided, they exploded, sending all of the debris from the 2 masses out into space. as they spread smaller bunches would gather around larger masses, caught in theyre orbits.
as for the speeding up thing, best i can come up with is that there is no friction whatsoever in space, nothing to slow stuff down, and what if at the edges there is a fource pushing us back toward the middle, the way space pushes on the outside of earth to counter the fource from the inside, thats how earth is circular.
what i would like to think is that the result of the collision is a huge cloud of all the matter that made up the 2 initial masses. think of a star cloud in space, that is just gases concentrating together to eventualy form a star or mass of some sort. think of that, but on a much bigger scale, you can think of our solar system as one cloud of gasses and masses that have concentrated together to form what it is, while at the same time our universe is a giant cloud of the the clouds of masses like our solar system, just much much larger, large enough to where we are but one partical in the cloud of our singular universe, now think of all the other universes there are out there, each star is another sun, so an all powerfull being created everything... and among EVERYTHING out there, we are special...
i would believe that we are the result of an aliens races last atempt at preserving theyre DNA.
i know im going back to something i already said, but who is to say interstelar travle doesnt exist, you think because you have been told it doesnt that it doesnt or hasnt?
as for the speeding up thing, best i can come up with is that there is no friction whatsoever in space, nothing to slow stuff down, and what if at the edges there is a fource pushing us back toward the middle, the way space pushes on the outside of earth to counter the fource from the inside, thats how earth is circular.
what i would like to think is that the result of the collision is a huge cloud of all the matter that made up the 2 initial masses. think of a star cloud in space, that is just gases concentrating together to eventualy form a star or mass of some sort. think of that, but on a much bigger scale, you can think of our solar system as one cloud of gasses and masses that have concentrated together to form what it is, while at the same time our universe is a giant cloud of the the clouds of masses like our solar system, just much much larger, large enough to where we are but one partical in the cloud of our singular universe, now think of all the other universes there are out there, each star is another sun, so an all powerfull being created everything... and among EVERYTHING out there, we are special...
i would believe that we are the result of an aliens races last atempt at preserving theyre DNA.
i know im going back to something i already said, but who is to say interstelar travle doesnt exist, you think because you have been told it doesnt that it doesnt or hasnt?
so you don't believe in evolution?
or you believe aliens caste their seed by starting our planet out from a single cell organism?
i tend to believe that life can arise on a large percentage of planets in a solar system. Meaning, I would put all my money on multiple events of a single cell organism being 'born' from the actions of the tidal ocean waves and the activities of volcanic activity, light from the sun, H2O, etc. in say as much as 2% of every solar system at any given time. Meaning, i think theirs a shite load of other inhabited planets out there that were self-sown. i'm not really a fan of the meteor spreading life hypothesis.
.
or you believe aliens caste their seed by starting our planet out from a single cell organism?
i tend to believe that life can arise on a large percentage of planets in a solar system. Meaning, I would put all my money on multiple events of a single cell organism being 'born' from the actions of the tidal ocean waves and the activities of volcanic activity, light from the sun, H2O, etc. in say as much as 2% of every solar system at any given time. Meaning, i think theirs a shite load of other inhabited planets out there that were self-sown. i'm not really a fan of the meteor spreading life hypothesis.
.
CrackerJax
New Member
i'll look it up now. but as far as 'boundaries' go... it was my understanding that the radiation emmited by stars/galaxies and such is the same no matter which way you point the device, meaning - we have never discerned any perceivable 'edge'.
hmm... but i have also heard that the further away you look (toward a far-off galaxy) the further back in time you are actually looking (because it takes the light a specific amount of time to even reach us) ... so conceivably if you looked far enough away... the only thing you would see is the Big Bang itself.
it is tickling to think however that so long as you have ever existed, you will continue to exist forever after, as from some point further out in space ... and further again out in space ... you are always saying or doing exactly what you are saying or doing -right now- (by someone else's perception). IE; our sun's light will always shine forth, even after the sun is long since gone. You would think, for this reason alone, that the universe would be expanding at least at the speed of light. But science and math are not my strong points.
(EDIT) ah, i see what you are saying about that Oort Cloud... hmm, ya it might be diminishing the light that the stars appear to be giving off. Super Bright Stars at night time... that would be some crazy stuff. Having two moons would be pretty cool as well
.
They have already recorded the big bang, they just haven't been able to "look" back far enough, but we are getting very close. It is fascinating. There are theories that one universe slips into being from another, emitting tremendous energy through a comparatively small crack in the time/space continuum, explaining the tremendous heat and expansion. As with all incredibly difficult puzzles, only diligent and time consuming work in the fields of science can get us there. Religion has nothing to offer in this regard. Religion explains NOTHING.
Yah, the Oort cloud is incredible. You do realize of course that we live way the heck out in booney land!! Of course the Oort cloud works in reverse and hides US from the center of the galaxy. There must be billions of solar systems that do not know what night is. The more you think about it, the more fascinating it becomes....
out.
Well if Your in a space ship (or whatever) around 13.7 billion light years away from Our "known" universe and have a powerful enough telescope than theoretically one would see the big bang taking place. The reason why I say "known" universe is because there could be other big bangs taking place all the time. At one point scientists thought the universe was only comprised of Our milkyway galaxy, and We now know that there are billions of galaxies that came from Our big bang.
The big bang is actually a very misleading oxymoron, because the big bang was silent. Yep, I said it. No typo here. Its because sound waves do not propagate through the vacuum of space, or any vacuum for that matter (or lack thereof.)
I believe dark matter is influenced gravity from a parallel demension created by black holes. So picture the red circles as being matter on Our side of "the universe" (or parallel demension) and the dark matter would be any matter on the other side of the black hole. There could be galaxies and whatnot on the other side too, and the gravities between Our matter and dark matter could have an effect on eachother.
I view black holes as effectively wormholes that connect different dimensions. This is My own (novel) hypothesis, and remember You heard it here first
~PEACE~
The big bang is actually a very misleading oxymoron, because the big bang was silent. Yep, I said it. No typo here. Its because sound waves do not propagate through the vacuum of space, or any vacuum for that matter (or lack thereof.)
I believe dark matter is influenced gravity from a parallel demension created by black holes. So picture the red circles as being matter on Our side of "the universe" (or parallel demension) and the dark matter would be any matter on the other side of the black hole. There could be galaxies and whatnot on the other side too, and the gravities between Our matter and dark matter could have an effect on eachother.
I view black holes as effectively wormholes that connect different dimensions. This is My own (novel) hypothesis, and remember You heard it here first
~PEACE~
Stoney McFried
Well-Known Member
I already defined carnal, your definition is WRONG.You seem like the guy with the god complex.
CrackerJax
New Member
He is so mixed up....... There's the shallow end of the pool and there's the deep end.....and then there's a puddle. Follow the walking catfish and at least find the pool...
out.
out.
CrackerJax
New Member
We have already PROVEN the BOOK to be FALSE.... next.
out.
out.
- Status