Dude, I'm not making any claims other than challenging yours. You stated that you would like to see an 80% reduction in the human population. 80%!!! Do you realize how unbelievably ridiculous that makes you sound. Why in the hell do you think we should murder 8 out of every 10 people? Tell me that and then I'll respond.you and ur buddy were being ass holes. if you want to oppose our ideas and theorys then do it civily, and back up your claims! dont just call us idiots and shake ur head without disproving us
how about befor you click the post butto you READ. i never said i want to murder 8 out of 10 people. i said it should be a gradual change!!! also this is my opinion has nothing to do with the purpos of this thread.Dude, I'm not making any claims other than challenging yours. You stated that you would like to see an 80% reduction in the human population. 80%!!! Do you realize how unbelievably ridiculous that makes you sound. Why in the hell do you think we should murder 8 out of every 10 people? Tell me that and then I'll respond.
Don't get high and mighty on me just because you make ridiculously silly statements and become offended when people call you out on it. So why should 8 out of 10 people die?
If you want to challenge the claims in this thread then back it up with evidence! or nobody will take you seriousllyim not saying we need to stop certan people from having sex, im saying overall we need a pop cut, and i dont care if it take 300 years. we need it. we would consume resources less and each person could have more land. alot of problems can be solved too, but the nwo is going to shove there dick down the worlds throat with this stuff... just watch.
it took time to get to the pop we r at now it can take time to reduce it too.
i think the govt knows what there doing when it comes to wastefull spending. do it, devalue the dollar so they can buy up everything! and controll everything and hand it all over to the un (like our national parks)
I have provided MANY WRITTEN WORD ARTICALS... Bring something to back up your claims other then saying I'm a PHD... I welcome you to bring proof to disprove anything posted.Define fact?
And why is it that theoretical claims in opposition to your youtube videos and conspiracy theories is not allowed or welcome? I challenge many of your claims on theoretical and paradigmatic levels and you tell me to leave...........
Just like Uncle Sam http://www.cremationofcare.com/illu_sym_baphomet.htm scroll down a lil bit and it has picsI couldn't help but notice one side having a striking resemblance to this:
i'm just curious...how many consecutive blotter hits do you need to eat for that link to make sense?Just like Uncle Sam http://www.cremationofcare.com/illu_sym_baphomet.htm scroll down a lil bit and it has pics
Can you say far fetched? Like WWWWAAAAAAYYYYYYY far fetched and completely a matter of interpretation.Just like Uncle Sam http://www.cremationofcare.com/illu_sym_baphomet.htm scroll down a lil bit and it has pics
I never said that, I'm just posting relevant things.so if someone does not accept every opinion of yours then they are sheep.
well fine then....B-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A *eats grass*
ok then, if so then my bad. its just that you seemed to respond with an accusational link about sheep and i'm all-too used to being labled 'sheep' by alex-jones supporters for not believing the hype. (i'm may be a noob in this forum but i'm not a forum noob, and where there's forums there's conspiracy theorists.)I never said that, I'm just posting relevant things.
everytime i presented evidence in debates here i was outright ignored. maybe intentionally or maybe just because you guys are smoking the good shit and just zoned out.i think we should look at everything relevant, and dismiss if it does not hold. i think thats fair, what do yall think?
jrh i will tell you yet again if ur gonna call bs on everything in this thread u better provide evidence, cos ur opinion, to me is worth less than the peso.
It wasn't directed at you or anyone else. I must ask you though what is a "conspiracy theorist"?ok then, if so then my bad. its just that you seemed to respond with an accusational link about sheep and i'm all-too used to being labled 'sheep' by alex-jones supporters for not believing the hype. (i'm may be a noob in this forum but i'm not a forum noob, and where there's forums there's conspiracy theorists.)
technically: one who theorizes on conspiracies.It wasn't directed at you or anyone else. I must ask you though what is a "conspiracy theorist"?