Dolce Vita
Active Member
really?..... i mean really? loltechnically: one who theorizes on conspiracies.
really?..... i mean really? loltechnically: one who theorizes on conspiracies.
i give a complete and all-encompassing answer to his vague question and you dare mock me?really?..... i mean really? lol
The majority 90%+ I got myself from google.I'm not attempting to convince others I just simply put out some new articals. I never said Alex Jones was right about everything. Though the majority of the time he links to the source artical or video. Someone else said it in another thread I forget which, but Alex Jones may be leading us the way the Powers That Be want. It just requires an open mind to see through the smoke and mirrors.technically: one who theorizes on conspiracies.
my definition in the context of forums: one who devotes their internet time to attempting to convince others that alex jones is right by posting alex jones links and pasting alex jones articles.
well...you asked
the new world order has learned from their mistake with hitler. there going to get the people to like whats coming their way. then they have no oppisition except for stoners like me. if i cant even convince you about whats going on, then how am i going to stand up and tell the world. the answer is they win and people like me are just the people who really know whats going on but we are mutes cos the gen pop will laugh at us and not look at the factsyes thats the way to correct corrupt governments. consolidate them all and hand them complete and unconditional authority over the world.
must be that hitler youth education resurfacing.
i don't understand that bit. please clarify.Someone else said it in another thread I forget which, but he may be leading us the way the Powers That Be want. It just requires an open mind.
by declaring yourself right and stating theory as 'fact' you instantly discredit yourself. i see no point in debating something with someone who is convinced that a theory is fact. it exhibits an unwillingness to ponder other possibilities, even if you suspect they are wrong. its similar to trying to convince an orthodox religious type of the possibility that there really is no god.the new world order has learned from their mistake with hitler. there going to get the people to like whats coming their way. then they have no oppisition except for stoners like me. if i cant even convince you about whats going on, then how am i going to stand up and tell the world. the answer is they win and people like me are just the people who really know whats going on but we are mutes cos the gen pop will laugh at us and not look at the facts
you're wrong.ok, convince me that im wrong. minds wide open!
you're right.you know what i guess i am wrong. wow i cant believe i believed those conspiracy theory's! those ppl are dumb
well, yes and no. i say were open minded to the the nwo takeover. and we are closed minded in the sense that we wont go back to the mindset we had before we were open minded. you are the same way in reverse.im just being a smartass.
look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.im just being a smartass.
look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
i could not agree more, thanks for articulating thisThis is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.
Everything is theory. Science is theory.
Then debate any of the articals posted please. Otherwise make an attack thread if you must attack each other.by declaring yourself right and stating theory as 'fact' you instantly discredit yourself. i see no point in debating something with someone who is convinced that a theory is fact. it exhibits an unwillingness to ponder other possibilities, even if you suspect they are wrong. its similar to trying to convince an orthodox religious type of the possibility that there really is no god.
You were wrong about the article on the Pope. He merely made the suggestion that there be more global oversight on the economy. He DID NOT call for a united world order. He DID NOT. But you made it sound like he authenticated the existence of a new world order. You do take links and blow them out of proportion. Then you tell us we're all wrong and you ask us to go away, claiming that you're the ONLY one who knows the truth. Do you understand how this makes you look? Take a step back and imagine from our point of view....ok, convince me that im wrong. minds wide open!
I don't have to provide proof for some of the criticisms I've been making. Dolce said that he wanted an 80% reduction in the population. I said that's a crazy idea. I then asked he would implement it - how he would control people's bodies by prohibiting them from reproducing. And I got told to leave.This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.
Everything is theory. Science is theory.