The Pro Alex Jones Thread.

yes thats the way to correct corrupt governments. consolidate them all and hand them complete and unconditional authority over the world.
must be that hitler youth education resurfacing.
 
PVS said:
technically: one who theorizes on conspiracies.
my definition in the context of forums: one who devotes their internet time to attempting to convince others that alex jones is right by posting alex jones links and pasting alex jones articles.

well...you asked :p
Click to expand...
The majority 90%+ I got myself from google.I'm not attempting to convince others I just simply put out some new articals. I never said Alex Jones was right about everything. Though the majority of the time he links to the source artical or video. Someone else said it in another thread I forget which, but Alex Jones may be leading us the way the Powers That Be want. It just requires an open mind to see through the smoke and mirrors.
 
PVS said:
yes thats the way to correct corrupt governments. consolidate them all and hand them complete and unconditional authority over the world.
must be that hitler youth education resurfacing.
Click to expand...

the new world order has learned from their mistake with hitler. there going to get the people to like whats coming their way. then they have no oppisition except for stoners like me. if i cant even convince you about whats going on, then how am i going to stand up and tell the world. the answer is they win and people like me are just the people who really know whats going on but we are mutes cos the gen pop will laugh at us and not look at the facts
 
Dolce Vita said:
the new world order has learned from their mistake with hitler. there going to get the people to like whats coming their way. then they have no oppisition except for stoners like me. if i cant even convince you about whats going on, then how am i going to stand up and tell the world. the answer is they win and people like me are just the people who really know whats going on but we are mutes cos the gen pop will laugh at us and not look at the facts
Click to expand...

by declaring yourself right and stating theory as 'fact' you instantly discredit yourself. i see no point in debating something with someone who is convinced that a theory is fact. it exhibits an unwillingness to ponder other possibilities, even if you suspect they are wrong. its similar to trying to convince an orthodox religious type of the possibility that there really is no god.
 
im just being a smartass.

look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
 
PVS said:
im just being a smartass.

look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
Click to expand...

well, yes and no. i say were open minded to the the nwo takeover. and we are closed minded in the sense that we wont go back to the mindset we had before we were open minded. you are the same way in reverse.
 
PVS said:
im just being a smartass.

look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
Click to expand...

This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.

Everything is theory. Science is theory. ;-)
 
Microdizzey said:
This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.

Everything is theory. Science is theory. ;-)
Click to expand...

i could not agree more, thanks for articulating this :hump:
 
PVS said:
by declaring yourself right and stating theory as 'fact' you instantly discredit yourself. i see no point in debating something with someone who is convinced that a theory is fact. it exhibits an unwillingness to ponder other possibilities, even if you suspect they are wrong. its similar to trying to convince an orthodox religious type of the possibility that there really is no god.
Click to expand...
Then debate any of the articals posted please. Otherwise make an attack thread if you must attack each other.
 
Dolce Vita said:
ok, convince me that im wrong. minds wide open!
Click to expand...

You were wrong about the article on the Pope. He merely made the suggestion that there be more global oversight on the economy. He DID NOT call for a united world order. He DID NOT. But you made it sound like he authenticated the existence of a new world order. You do take links and blow them out of proportion. Then you tell us we're all wrong and you ask us to go away, claiming that you're the ONLY one who knows the truth. Do you understand how this makes you look? Take a step back and imagine from our point of view....

Here's how you sound. "Alright guys, this is a thread on Alex Jones. We're going to praise Alex Jones because he's right about everything. We're going to paste hundreds of links to videos and make unbelievable claims without any proof. I am right about everything. Do not challenge my opinion."

Sound absurd? Because it is.
 
Microdizzey said:
This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.

Everything is theory. Science is theory. ;-)
Click to expand...

I don't have to provide proof for some of the criticisms I've been making. Dolce said that he wanted an 80% reduction in the population. I said that's a crazy idea. I then asked he would implement it - how he would control people's bodies by prohibiting them from reproducing. And I got told to leave.

So how can I provide evidence when I'm merely asking him to REFINE his argument so that it makes sense. I can't even understand most of what you guys say it's so far out there. So I need you to REFINE your argument. When you constantly refuse to do so, it makes you look like you can't refine it. Thus, there is not argument. There's only Youtube video after Youtube video after Youtube video..............

So tell me - what makes you think Obama is creating robots to destroy anyone who disagrees with him?

How can you feasibly implement a population reduction without taking away people's freedom?

Let's hear it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

hanimmal
AP: Fraud claims aimed in part at keeping Trump base loyal.
17 18 19
Replies
371
Views
22K
hanimmal
hanimmal
C. Nesbitt
Is This a Male? Then Grafting to Create New Strains. Abstract Art. I am Bored.
2
Replies
21
Views
776
DrOgkush
DrOgkush
DIY-HP-LED
The Daily Blow by Blow Impeachment Hearings and Trial of Donald Trump
56 57 58
Replies
1K
Views
83K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
koalajesus
Koalajesus grows cannabis
Replies
10
Views
672
koalajesus
koalajesus
scumrot derelict
god told me to skin you alive
Replies
12
Views
747
scumrot derelict
scumrot derelict
Back
Top