Stoney McFried
Well-Known Member
Somebody obviously divorced you and it pissed you off, huh?
Marriage was created as a way to establish ownership of a woman and her property.It was also a means to ensure the paternity of children,because it granted him and only him the right to sexual favors from the woman he had married.It ensured the woman would be cared for in the event of the man's death, and that the children who shared his name would inherit his properties and holdings.
No, the same logic does not apply in the case of siblings, as any issue from such a marriage has an increased risk of birth defects and deformities.See inbreeding.
However, if more than two consenting adults wish to be married,I see no reason they cannot.Even in the Bible, polygamy was practiced.So any moral argument against that on religious grounds is a contradiction.
Perhaps in your world "I think this" and "I believe this" are a good enough reason for things to be done your way, but in the real world,most people would demand proof to support what you say regarding traditional marriage and its wonderful benefits as opposed to other lifestyles.Otherwise its just your opinion.
Wow.This sounds like socialism to me, Mr. Conservative.Yeah, let's have the state interfere in every custody case regardless of the unique individuals involved and their respective situations and force them to raise their children in exactly the way RickWhite thinks they should be!Fucking NOT!
Yeah, a scrap of paper obtained at the courthouse is the bedrock of the family, the country, its values!Because you don't truly love one another unless you're A. A man and a woman and B.Willing to "verify" those feelings through a legal or religious ceremony that really does nothing more than determine how the property is divided if you decide to break up.
Because only marriage can determine love!Only in marriage can anyone have children or a family!Only a man and woman together can raise a child!All other familial configurations,no matter how loving or nurturing,are wrong because they can't be verified on paper!
You know, the reason folks accuse you of being a homophobe,sexist, and bigot is because you sure do argue just like one. The louder one screams about homosexuals not getting the right to marry,the more one sounds like he dislikes them because of the things they do in the privacy of their own bedroom.The more interested one is in the doings of others in their private bedrooms,the more it makes one wonder if that person isn't really doing anything that interests them in their own.
I'm sure you'll argue now about me being one of those damn leftists that multiquotes and takes your entire argument out of context.The reason folks feel the need to do such a thing is because many of the things you say need to be addressed on an individual basis.If you cannot keep up, too bad for you.
Marriage was created as a way to establish ownership of a woman and her property.It was also a means to ensure the paternity of children,because it granted him and only him the right to sexual favors from the woman he had married.It ensured the woman would be cared for in the event of the man's death, and that the children who shared his name would inherit his properties and holdings.
No, the same logic does not apply in the case of siblings, as any issue from such a marriage has an increased risk of birth defects and deformities.See inbreeding.
However, if more than two consenting adults wish to be married,I see no reason they cannot.Even in the Bible, polygamy was practiced.So any moral argument against that on religious grounds is a contradiction.
Perhaps in your world "I think this" and "I believe this" are a good enough reason for things to be done your way, but in the real world,most people would demand proof to support what you say regarding traditional marriage and its wonderful benefits as opposed to other lifestyles.Otherwise its just your opinion.
Wow.This sounds like socialism to me, Mr. Conservative.Yeah, let's have the state interfere in every custody case regardless of the unique individuals involved and their respective situations and force them to raise their children in exactly the way RickWhite thinks they should be!Fucking NOT!
Yeah, a scrap of paper obtained at the courthouse is the bedrock of the family, the country, its values!Because you don't truly love one another unless you're A. A man and a woman and B.Willing to "verify" those feelings through a legal or religious ceremony that really does nothing more than determine how the property is divided if you decide to break up.
Because only marriage can determine love!Only in marriage can anyone have children or a family!Only a man and woman together can raise a child!All other familial configurations,no matter how loving or nurturing,are wrong because they can't be verified on paper!
You know, the reason folks accuse you of being a homophobe,sexist, and bigot is because you sure do argue just like one. The louder one screams about homosexuals not getting the right to marry,the more one sounds like he dislikes them because of the things they do in the privacy of their own bedroom.The more interested one is in the doings of others in their private bedrooms,the more it makes one wonder if that person isn't really doing anything that interests them in their own.
I'm sure you'll argue now about me being one of those damn leftists that multiquotes and takes your entire argument out of context.The reason folks feel the need to do such a thing is because many of the things you say need to be addressed on an individual basis.If you cannot keep up, too bad for you.
