Reasons to Vote yes on Prop 19

[TokinPodPilot]

Says the guy supporting prohibition and all the mendo millionaires. You act like prop 19 is what is bringing profits into cannabis. But people have been getting rich off it for 40 years. The idea that supporting prohibition is supporting freedom is laughable.

Ah yes... Dan Beck is back with more empty associations and baseless assumption. You never fail to deliver with the propaganda. The infantile derivation that anyone voting no is for prohibition is just pathetic. You're hypocritical attempt to attach and attack my non-existent profit motives to cover your profit motives in this are what's laughable here. It's very clear you're willing to throw anyone you have to under the bus of regulation in the name of your profit margin. I'd rather not see any of my friends or family go to jail just because they're suddenly "not old enough".

 

[mr2shim]

Ah yes... Dan Beck is back with more empty associations and baseless assumption. You never fail to deliver with the propaganda. The infantile derivation that anyone voting no is for prohibition is just pathetic. You're hypocritical attempt to attach and attack my non-existent profit motives to cover your profit motives in this are what's laughable here. It's very clear you're willing to throw anyone you have to under the bus of regulation in the name of your profit margin. I'd rather not see any of my friends or family go to jail just because they're suddenly "not old enough".

I'd much rather not see any of my friends or family go to jail because it's completely illegal. Come on Californians, now is not the time to start burrowing in your own asses.

 

[420God]

Ah yes... Dan Beck is back with more empty associations and baseless assumption. You never fail to deliver with the propaganda. The infantile derivation that anyone voting no is for prohibition is just pathetic. You're hypocritical attempt to attach and attack my non-existent profit motives to cover your profit motives in this are what's laughable here. It's very clear you're willing to throw anyone you have to under the bus of regulation in the name of your profit margin. I'd rather not see any of my friends or family go to jail just because they're suddenly "not old enough".

Still not understanding why you think anyone would be locked up if it passes, it's just the opposite. If you're trying to argue the age factor then the medical bill trumps that and that's according to the Supreme court.

 

[TokinPodPilot]

Still not understanding why you think anyone would be locked up if it passes, it's just the opposite. If you're trying to argue the age factor then the medical bill trumps that and that's according to the Supreme court.

Yes well, with reasoning like that, I can see how you'd misunderstand. Medical only applies to those that have a recommendation. Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge, whereas before they'd have only received an infraction. But you do whatever mental gymnastics you need to make yourself feel justified.

 

[Dan Kone]

Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge, whereas before they'd have only received an infraction.

Calling you out. That is a lie. If I'm wrong, prove it.

 

[budling357]

Yes well, with reasoning like that, I can see how you'd misunderstand. Medical only applies to those that have a recommendation. Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge, whereas before they'd have only received an infraction. But you do whatever mental gymnastics you need to make yourself feel justified.

It states no where that "Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge".

Those selling/supplying to "Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge".

 

[420God]

Yes well, with reasoning like that, I can see how you'd misunderstand. Medical only applies to those that have a recommendation. Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge, whereas before they'd have only received an infraction. But you do whatever mental gymnastics you need to make yourself feel justified.

Mental gymnastics? I believe my posts are clear and to the point.

Where does it say the laws will get stiffer if it passes?

 

[Dan Kone]

Those selling/supplying to "Anyone under the age of 21, without a recommendation, is subject to a felony possession charge".

It actually says those knowingly selling to those under 21 are subject to a felony charge. So in order for someone to get busted for that, the cops have to prove you knew they were under 21. That makes it almost impossible to bust anyone for that unless you are standing out on a street corner selling to an undercover cop who states his age before you sell to him. In that case, no sympathy. That's some dumb shit.