Maybe John Kennedy's driver William Greer shot him with an air pistol

Status
Not open for further replies.

doc111

Well-Known Member
I used the footage and told you what you are seeing is a gun, and he passes that gun to his left hand 4 seconds before he shoots Kennedy. Apparently you will stick to your delusions forever.

Also, the supposed mist can not be seen in another video because it's fake and so is your brain.LOL I showed it to you failbags and you make up some more bswhat to try to justify your fake claims.
Oh, YOU told me what I'm seeing did you?:roll:

See, I have this problem. It's called critical thought. I tend to think for myself, and make my own conclusions based on available facts, evidence, rational thought and logic. The last 2, you clearly lack. As for facts and evidence? That's up for debate as well. I will stick to my "delusions". Thanks for trying to browbeat us all with the "truth" though. ;-)
 

7forever

Active Member
BP,

This is your case. Jfk's head goes slightly forward, then stops, and for no reason his head and body slam violently backward. That is cartoon stuff and nothing else. You'll always have the problem of the mist being in front of his face before 313 which is when the headshot occurs. It fails on both counts and no honest thinking person would ever believe it anyway.
 

7forever

Active Member
Hey Doc,

You can believe or disbelieve whatever you wish but Greer passes a covered up object to his left hand 4 seconds before the shot. No defense attorney in this world would ever deny that to a jury because it's a visual fact.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Hey Doc,

You can believe or disbelieve whatever you wish but Greer passes a covered up object to his left hand 4 seconds before the shot. No defense attorney in this world would ever deny that to a jury because it's a visual fact.
The video does not clearly show what you claim it does. If it did we wouldn't be having this debate.:dunce:
 

7forever

Active Member
The video does not clearly show what you claim it does. If it did we wouldn't be having this debate.:dunce:
There is no debate. I posted conclusive evidence that Greer is the only suspect for the fatal shot and received no challenge from any person on any forum, just denials.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
There is no debate. I posted conclusive evidence that Greer is the only suspect for the fatal shot and received no challenge from any person on any forum, just denials.
Without posting the same bs video you posted a thousand times in this thread already, can you illustrate for me exactly what "conclusive evidence" you've posted? I haven't seen it. Just trolling, name calling and a bunch of denials from yourself. You're right about one thing though; there is no debate. You can't have one of those if the opponent you're debating has no brain. Just sayin'.:-P
 

7forever

Active Member
Without posting the same bs video you posted a thousand times in this thread already, can you illustrate for me exactly what "conclusive evidence" you've posted? I haven't seen it. Just trolling, name calling and a bunch of denials from yourself. You're right about one thing though; there is no debate. You can't have one of those if the opponent you're debating has no brain. Just sayin'.:-P
Without posting the same empty denials and claming authority of which you have none, can you illustrate for me exactly what evidence you have of any conclusion? I haven't seen it. Just trolling, name calling and a bunch of denials from yourself. You're right about one thing though; there is no debate. You can't have one of those if the opponent you're debating has no brain. Just sayin':lol: You can't beat me and you certainly can't beat the correct conclusion for the fatal shot.;-)
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Without posting the same empty denials and claming authority of which you have none, can you illustrate for me exactly what evidence you have of any conclusion? I haven't seen it. Just trolling, name calling and a bunch of denials from yourself. You're right about one thing though; there is no debate. You can't have one of those if the opponent you're debating has no brain. Just sayin':lol: You can't beat me and you certainly can't beat the correct conclusion for the fatal shot.;-)
Umm, what authority have I ever claimed? Empty denials? I'm only going off of YOUR videos and "expert" opinion. I'm not as obtuse as you might imagine. I'm sure you're used to being dismissed as the retard you appear to be. I'm open minded and mature enough to change my opinion. If showed some actual evidence and not some grainy video that doesn't at all show what you claim it does, I would be inclined to do just that (change my mind). I have no vested interest in denying the truth. lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think you're my new favorite troll!:clap:
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Seriously, you need to stop believing this nonsense. if he used a revolver the blast would have hit Gov Connoly and his wife, they are in the path. They were not blasted in the face by burnt propellant. You would SEE this report and flash on the film if it were true.

[video=youtube;K-cCmWWM8ew]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-cCmWWM8ew[/video]
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Seriously, you need to stop believing this nonsense. if he used a revolver the blast would have hit Gov Connoly and his wife, they are in the path. They were not blasted in the face by burnt propellant. You would SEE this report and flash on the film if it were true.

[video=youtube;K8E_zMLCRNg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg[/video]


:clap::clap::clap:
 

7forever

Active Member
Umm, what authority have I ever claimed? Empty denials? I'm only going off of YOUR videos and "expert" opinion. I'm not as obtuse as you might imagine. I'm sure you're used to being dismissed as the retard you appear to be. I'm open minded and mature enough to change my opinion. If showed some actual evidence and not some grainy video that doesn't at all show what you claim it does, I would be inclined to do just that (change my mind). I have no vested interest in denying the truth. lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think you're my new favorite troll!:clap:
You said I wrong, you tool, without providing any challenge. The authority you're claiming is saying I'm wrong without addressing the evidence that destroys your delusions and the debunked WC.
 

7forever

Active Member
Seriously, you need to stop believing this nonsense. if he used a revolver the blast would have hit Gov Connoly and his wife, they are in the path. They were not blasted in the face by burnt propellant. You would SEE this report and flash on the film if it were true.

[video=youtube;K-cCmWWM8ew]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-cCmWWM8ew[/video]
He got out of the way you silly failure and the fake reflection and fake mist are in sync.

 

7forever

Active Member
Umm, what authority have I ever claimed? Empty denials? I'm only going off of YOUR videos and "expert" opinion. I'm not as obtuse as you might imagine. I'm sure you're used to being dismissed as the retard you appear to be. I'm open minded and mature enough to change my opinion. If showed some actual evidence and not some grainy video that doesn't at all show what you claim it does, I would be inclined to do just that (change my mind). I have no vested interest in denying the truth. lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think you're my new favorite troll!:clap:
The films I use are the same films that have been used by the government and hundreds of authors. Your grainy defense is a fucking joke just like your inane posts.
I'm sure you're used to being dismissed as the retard that you are in this thread. You are not open minded or mature enough to change your opinion, whatever that may be. If you posed some actual challenge and not simple posts of nonsense you would not be such a silly troll. You have no vested interest in anything in this case because you've done nothing whatosever to defend against Greer as the assassin or shared what you think happened because you know I would destroy your delusions with a simple copy and paste. lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You're one of many trolls in this thread!:clap:
 

7forever

Active Member
7forever, you cant hide from the truth, why are you trying to hide and lie?

Why Cant you respond to this proof that you are complety wrong lol he even went as far as to get my last post about this deleted lol


WHY THE ZAPRUDER FILM IS AUTHENTIC HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
BP, you can't hide from the truth, why are you trying to hide and lie?

Why Cant you respond to this proof that you are complety wrong? lol


THE ZAPRUDER FILM IS FAKE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

This is your case. Jfk's head goes slightly forward, then stops, and for no reason his head and body slam violently backward. That is cartoon stuff and nothing more. You'll always have the problem of the mist being in front of his face before 313 which is when the headshot occurs. It fails on both counts and no honest thinking person would ever believe it anyway.


THE BULLET HAS NOT CONNECTED HERE, PROVING THE MIST FAKE.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member


This is your case. Jfk's head goes slightly forward, then stops, and for no reason his head and body slam violently backward. That is cartoon stuff and nothing more. You'll always have the problem of the mist being in front of his face before 313 which is when the headshot occurs. It fails on both counts and no honest thinking person would ever believe it anyway

A bullet travels faster than the speed of sound, it will travel over 100 feet in just a single frame of the Zap film, when you see the mist the bullet was already there and gone. Everyone Jerks because the sonic boom created by the passing bullet has that effect. Of course if you have never been shot at I don't expect you to know any of this.

If your evidence is so good how come we haven't all heard about it on TV or in the newspapers or in magazines or all over the web? The reason? Your evidence isn't any good.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
You said I wrong, you tool, without providing any challenge. The authority you're claiming is saying I'm wrong without addressing the evidence that destroys your delusions and the debunked WC.
I don't recall telling you that you were wrong. Could be the delusions or hallucinations. I have addressed your evidence. I said that I could see NO gun in any frame of the film you are presenting. I didn't say it wasn't there (personally, I don't believe it is). I am allowed to voice my opinion ya know? You're so quick to get all defensive that you obviously don't read the entire post. Are you just hoping for a confrontation? :roll:

You seriously entertain me. One bit of advice though. Could you make your posts a little bit more outrageous and insulting. You called me a "tool" which is pretty lame. I was hoping for something a little saltier. :mrgreen:
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Could you make your posts a little bit more outrageous and insulting. You called me a "tool" which is pretty lame. I was hoping for something a little saltier. :mrgreen:
In his defense he did call you a retard, close minded and immature in post #295 Oh and a Troll.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top