legallyflying
Well-Known Member
Ohhh. Sorry to try and inject a little humor into yer another thred started by someoe that is unable to use the search function. I mean come on, how many hits could make and it and rain really return. But as it turns out, this immature twit has a masters degree in ecology, has worked in the restoration field for over a decade and has about 20 credit hours in graduate level plant pysiology coursework. So in the interrest of dispelling yet more miss information, and plant physiology theory that was developed during some cheech and chong weekend marathon I can tell you that the assumptions and reasoning stated above for the MIR technique are completely and utterly WRONG.
Plants can't uptake nutrients when fed rainwater? Really? Huh. That's kind of wierd given that rainwater is the only source of water for 90% of the plants in the world.
Plants response to water logged and hypoxic soils is more root growth? Gee I guess all those studies that found saturated soils resulted in reduced growth, root development and biomass were wrong. And hear I thought soil hypoxia promoted root rot, decreased microbial activity, and less nutrient uptake due to altered redox potential. For the record, drying soil will promote further root growth as the plant roots follow the moisture. That is why it's better to drench and let dry out, not just water a little everyday.
Plant transpiration rates are a function of stomata and are influenced by light intensity, temperature, and humidity. It hasn't got a single thing to due with the roots. Uptake yes, transpiration, no. So the idea that "plants are uptaking more water and will suck up more nutrients" is bunk. Plants respond to environmental conditions, not on "memmory" of past conditions.
So while flushing the soil has plenty of benefits, unless you have high concentrations of minerals or screwed up ph it is unneccesary and in fact, detrimental. The degree of detriment is largely a function of the water holding capacity of your soil and duration of hypoxia.
So yeah, this thread is "interesting" but only in the sense that i find the degree to which some people anthropomorphasize mj plants and torture botanical physiology to support their observations amusing.
If you don't find the thought of showering a stripper with pennies amusing, then you need to switch strains cause your smoking "humorless tight ass kush"
Plants can't uptake nutrients when fed rainwater? Really? Huh. That's kind of wierd given that rainwater is the only source of water for 90% of the plants in the world.
Plants response to water logged and hypoxic soils is more root growth? Gee I guess all those studies that found saturated soils resulted in reduced growth, root development and biomass were wrong. And hear I thought soil hypoxia promoted root rot, decreased microbial activity, and less nutrient uptake due to altered redox potential. For the record, drying soil will promote further root growth as the plant roots follow the moisture. That is why it's better to drench and let dry out, not just water a little everyday.
Plant transpiration rates are a function of stomata and are influenced by light intensity, temperature, and humidity. It hasn't got a single thing to due with the roots. Uptake yes, transpiration, no. So the idea that "plants are uptaking more water and will suck up more nutrients" is bunk. Plants respond to environmental conditions, not on "memmory" of past conditions.
So while flushing the soil has plenty of benefits, unless you have high concentrations of minerals or screwed up ph it is unneccesary and in fact, detrimental. The degree of detriment is largely a function of the water holding capacity of your soil and duration of hypoxia.
So yeah, this thread is "interesting" but only in the sense that i find the degree to which some people anthropomorphasize mj plants and torture botanical physiology to support their observations amusing.
If you don't find the thought of showering a stripper with pennies amusing, then you need to switch strains cause your smoking "humorless tight ass kush"