newatit2010
Well-Known Member
No the ex wh environmental advisor that blames the government for 9/11.van jones? you mean alex jones?
No the ex wh environmental advisor that blames the government for 9/11.van jones? you mean alex jones?
so your parroting without a critical thought of your own? and you got nerve to say im blind...I'm just sharing what's in the news. If it conflicts with your blind trust in the 9/11 Omission Report, that's YOUR problem.
I believe, someone please correct me if I'm wrong, that there are more Jews in NYC than any other place in the world other than Israel. They may not be concentrated in lower Manhattan, but they don't typically like to bomb their own people.so your parroting without a critical thought of your own? and you got nerve to say im blind...
so come on then lets hear your tale of intrigue where mossad joins with saudi special forces to bring about 911
Touche! I could be wrong but I think the govt. of Israel has some scruples. Al Qaeda on the other hand.............There were plenty of muslims who died too. I guess al quida decided they were infidels for living and working where they did.
Like the US, I don't think Zionists would let anyone get in the way of their agenda. They certainly didn't let the US get in their way on the USS Liberty.I believe, someone please correct me if I'm wrong, that there are more Jews in NYC than any other place in the world other than Israel. They may not be concentrated in lower Manhattan, but they don't typically like to bomb their own people.
The USS Liberty incident was determined to be a case of mistaken identity, ya know, fog of war type stuff? They were in the middle of a war at the time of the incident and things like this happen in EVERY war. Doesn't mean there was an agenda or a conspiracy of any sort. We were then, and remain Israel's closest ally.Like the US, I don't think Zionists would let anyone get in the way of their agenda. They certainly didn't let the US get in their way on the USS Liberty.
As far as scruples go, I wouldn't go so far as to hang that tag on any player in planetary politics.
Yup, uh huh. I, obviously disagree. The Israeli fighters that fired upon the Liberty could not identify it as a US warship?The USS Liberty incident was determined to be a case of mistaken identity, ya know, fog of war type stuff? They were in the middle of a war at the time of the incident and things like this happen in EVERY war. Doesn't mean there was an agenda or a conspiracy or any sort. We were then, and remain Israel's closest ally.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
Ya know, you may be right. I can't say, I wasn't at any of those incidents (with the exception of 9/11). Maybe they were all false flag operations, maybe they weren't. We will likely never know for sure. The story of the Liberty being a false flag operation just doesn't make any sense to me and it obviously failed if the intent was a pretext for going into the middle east in the late 60's. We didn't make it in until the early 90's.Yup, uh huh. I, obviously disagree. The Israeli fighters that fired upon the Liberty could not identify it as a US warship?
I refer to the Lusitania, the Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor... false flags have been the SOP for getting us into war. Same as 9/11.
Closest ally? Yes, unfortunately, we are the closest ally to one of the worst terrorist nation on the planet.
This reminds me of the cowboy who only wore one spur. When asked why he didn't wear two, he replied "Well I figure if'n I can get one side of the horse moven', the other side il keep up"Of course they aren't small by any measure, I can't understand a partial collapse of the affected area. But how does the entire building collapse when most of it was un affected by the Twin Towers falling?
If that doesn't raise any suspicion what so ever for you I will have to agree to disagree.
do you realize just how feeble your looking right now?
Not sure how I missed this vid. Brilliant!damn shame on me forgot my "molten steel vid"
[youtube]7YXzjAKJQOg[/youtube]
anyone who thinks they have substance pls provide links
While watching the video notice how they debunk the molten metal bit by saying no way could it last 6 weeks, all the while trying to explain away 1000F metal that is being cleaned up by the claw weeks afterwards as being totally possible.Not sure how I missed this vid. Brilliant!
I'm wondering what the conspiracy folk have to say about this? I pointed out that "molten steel" doesn't prove controlled demolition and even IF thermite were used to bring the building down, it burns extremely rapidly and extremely hot. It would've burned out in seconds or perhaps minutes and would've begun to cool. It wouldn't have caused steel to still be molten weeks after the event. I'm sure this will go completely ignored much like all the other proof which has debunked many of these "conspiracies".