budlover13
King Tut
Anyone got a video to post of the spin that came out of Libya?
Haven't even watched it. As long as it shows media spin, the subject of the video is irrelevant imo.that is exactly what i would like to see. for you to talk about ron paul and spam his videos IN A RON PAUL THREAD.
kindly post your endless videos over there.
what would you say if someone who had a link to herman cain in their sig posted endless videos of herman cain being smeared under various threads to which it was tangentially "on topic"?Just watched it and given CNN's history of editing/spinning, i personally believe it is relevant.
yep.So, thhis one was spam too?
[youtube]Cv5k4ZHSdhY[/youtube]
Glad you asked.Anyone got a video to post of the spin that came out of Libya?
That's why i suggested a video of other spin.what would you say if someone who had a link to herman cain in their sig posted endless videos of herman cain being smeared under various threads to which it was tangentially "on topic"?
what if that scenario applied to romney?
to post ron paul vids and threads endlessly is one thing. deprave does it, but he gets that there needs to be some limit to it.
this may be relevant, but you know what is going on here.
i'm done with this for now. go ahead, spam away and i will not say a word. it will all be over soon enough.
Nothing was imbedded for me.?Glad you asked.
[youtube]XIFrrcAuGaI[/youtube]
LOL! But it came up when i quoted you.Nothing was imbedded for me.?
Great, I wished you would have just asked.yep.
i fail to see what the gold standard has to do with the OP (which seemed to be about republicrats), other than to endorse the views of the person you constantly post about.
there is an easily observed pattern. it doesn't exist in non-spammer type people.
i'd go find it if i weren't so damn high and focused on what happens now that frothiness abounds.That's why i suggested a video of other spin.
I find the story behind the frothiness to be inspiring and hilarious...i'd go find it if i weren't so damn high and focused on what happens now that frothiness abounds.
Not trying to "win" (here at least lol). Just trying to be fair and unbiased. The fair part comes easyi'd go find it if i weren't so damn high and focused on what happens now that frothiness abounds.
you win. all ron paul spam is fine and i will not even bother but to say "damn you" and what such.
i secretly like the guy a tiny little bit. and i am not opposed to many of his economic views.I find the story behind the frothiness to be inspiring and hilarious...
i still think it is spam, but this is a hill i will not try to take. like you said, it's all opinion, i guess.Not trying to "win" (here at least lol). Just trying to be fair and unbiased. The fair part comes easy
Well, I was talking about Dan Savage and redefining Santorum's name, but sure.i secretly like the guy a tiny little bit. and i am not opposed to many of his economic views.
and he has that tear jerker about his youngest child. he could be tough.
My understanding is that the Politics forum is to remain more or less un-modded except for name-calling and personal attacks. By definition, yes, the RP vids/posts most likely fall under the generally accepted definition. But when you follow SPIRIT of the law, in the Politics forum, i would consider spam as being a "Get Harder Longer" type of thing or repetitive identical posts.i still think it is spam, but this is a hill i will not try to take. like you said, it's all opinion, i guess.
I like your message, but are you the same person I said before that if you were a programmer your code would be fucked? Sorry, my background in that just makes me nit picky towards shit like that lol..oh mirror, tell me who is my new emperor to be.
im hopeless without someone rearending me unlubricated.
still , finding it utterly ridiculous to look for hope from politicians (and especially under the current system (which is hopelessly corrupt (you´d need to dump half the crowd there to even begin to start to clean it up)