abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
These are facts?
These are facts in the sense that that is what the "holy books" claim.
These are facts?
These are facts in the sense that that is what the "holy books" claim.
But that right there perfectly captures the frustration that some feel when perusing holy texts ... circularity. From a rationalist's perspective, there is no good in believing in a book because the book certifies its own truthfulness. So for most Christians (or other Abrahamic believers) there must be something more, external to text, that supports the belief. For some, it is a personal mystical experience. For others, it's accession to social/cultural pressure, simply having gone to church/mosque/etc. all of one's life and being comfy with it. For others yet ... other yet. Bottom line ... it is invariably something that isn't communicable to a hypothetical rationalist's satisfaction. When I see the word "fact" I assume and ultimately require the process by which it was verified. In its way it is a stricter term than "truth".
Impasse. cn
But that right there perfectly captures the frustration that some feel when perusing holy texts ... circularity. From a rationalist's perspective, there is no good in believing in a book because the book certifies its own truthfulness. So for most Christians (or other Abrahamic believers) there must be something more, external to text, that supports the belief. For some, it is a personal mystical experience. For others, it's accession to social/cultural pressure, simply having gone to church/mosque/etc. all of one's life and being comfy with it. For others yet ... other yet. Bottom line ... it is invariably something that isn't communicable to a hypothetical rationalist's satisfaction. When I see the word "fact" I assume and ultimately require the process by which it was verified. In its way it is a stricter term than "truth".
Impasse. cn
I know God is real because I am alive.
I did, sorryWho created God?
I did, sorry
And you think a sorry will suffice?
All I see is a bunch of God-bashing, monkey-metamorphisis, space alien, crazy-ass beliefs, on here, and being a minister of the Universal Life Church, I'm almost tempted to roll up shop and go elsewhere... Just wondering... Little bit of a check here.... I am tolerant of anyones beliefs, but there is a great in-tolerance of anything Christian I ever say when people talk about their far-fetched, man-made, dreamed up concoctions of science and sci-fi, and whatever... Whatever happenned to just believing that Christ died for our sins, and that God created everything, including cannabis, which is clearly pointed out, and spoken HIGHLY of many times in The Bible? Anyone? Seriously, anyone?
My grandma knows God isn't real because she is dead.I know God is real because I am alive.
^ atheist?
![]()
Absurdist.
The sort of God an atheist doubts has a pretty clear definition.
Fairly certain that if you're a Christian, AND you're on RIU, you're going to hell. . . . . . if you believe in Christianity. .... . . interesting. I've got no hate for you though. Just don't push it on me. Keep it green. Keep it happy.![]()
Isn't this a perfect time to mention Scientology?
BTW, just so we understand each other...you mean the cloying religious, force fed, hell and damnation sort?
Not the, that's amazing and no way can I truely describe it, sort, right?
The sort of God an atheist doubts has a pretty clear definition.
...and yet we're asked to describe that God - sometimes we can't. Does that rend discussion futile? I don't see why it would. Some people are flighty and some people are in danger of painting everything around them stark white.
Eggshell.