made me look it up ... good oneExecutive order 11478...
so a bias, not ordinary?I know that the way the gov't counts unemployment systematically undercounts actual people interested in working but not finding jobs: the ststisticians simply ignore those who've been unemployed after some shortish time period. The base quantities would show any other systematic data massage. My opinion. cn
I don't know if ordinary. I do know it's not very honest of them. cnso a bias, not ordinary?
Probably not.Does the Federal gov't adhere to the ILO standard? cn
No fair, bigger bewbs.dis wins