romney committed a federal felony?

deprave

deprave

New Member
I made a thread about it, nobody replied its probably on page 2 now, I quoted the article and provided a video and funny picture, title is Romney "I did not have sexual relations with that company"

also this isn't the only felony
 
ink the world

ink the world

Well-Known Member
He either lied to the SEC, the Mass. elections board or to us all.

His statements to the SEC and to the Mass election board directly contradict each other. There is a reason after vetting that McCain didn't pick him as VP candidate. People are already noticing the skeletons in the closet, imagine what theyd find w/ 10 years of tax returns.

Pains me to say it but I will. Ann Coulter was right.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Maybe you libs should get your news from other sources. People in the administration are already walking back the accusation. Liberal excusers are stating the administration overreached completely on this. The Washington Post (liberal rag) gave it 3 pinnochios. The Republicans are already having a joyous field day beating the Dems over the head with it. Obama seems to be one of only a few people (mostly MSNBC talking heads) trying to ice-skate uphill and push this complete fabrication. They lie because they think the MSM will provide cover, they were wrong this time. The fact you don't already know this, only shows you get your news exclusively from hack liberal sources.

Ive seen it discredited from a dozen or so news sources. Fuck, Sununu absolutely DESTROYED Andrea Mitchell on this subject the other night. It's laughable, pathetic and entirely predictable. Lying is the foundation of Progressive values, without lies, none of their agenda would EVER see the light if day. But, it's all excusable, means to an end.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Maybe you libs should get your news from other sources. People in the administration are already walking back the accusation. Liberal excusers are stating the administration overreached completely on this. The Washington Post (liberal rag) gave it 3 pinnochios. The Republicans are already having a joyous field day beating the Dems over the head with it. Obama seems to be one of only a few people (mostly MSNBC talking heads) trying to ice-skate uphill and push this complete fabrication. They lie because they think the MSM will provide cover, they were wrong this time. The fact you don't already know this, only shows you get your news exclusively from hack liberal sources.

Ive seen it discredited from a dozen or so news sources. Fuck, Sununu absolutely DESTROYED Andrea Mitchell on this subject the other night. It's laughable, pathetic and entirely predictable. Lying is the foundation of Progressive values, without lies, none of their agenda would EVER see the light if day. But, it's all excusable, means to an end.
Click to expand...
libs
Liberal excusers
(liberal rag)
pinnochios
Republicans
complete fabrication
lie
MSM
hack liberal sources
discredited
Fuck
Sununu
DESTROYED
Andrea Mitchell
laughable
pathetic
predictable
Lying
Progressive
lies,
agenda
excusable
means to an end


MuyLocoNC said:
Yeah, I don't get my info from them. However, I do stand with the 31,000 American scientists that signed the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine's global warming petition against the horseshit that is MMGW. They must ALL be in the Koch brother's pocket.
Click to expand...
 
unohu69

unohu69

Well-Known Member
And yahoo (of all places) actually had a article about Rons long shot to take the convention....

I dont think itl happen. An honest man has no place in washington...
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
libs
Liberal excusers
(liberal rag)
pinnochios
Republicans
complete fabrication
lie
MSM
hack liberal sources
discredited
Fuck
Sununu
DESTROYED
Andrea Mitchell
laughable
pathetic
predictable
Lying
Progressive
lies,
agenda
excusable
means to an end
Click to expand...
That's awesome, is that the new game? Can't argue the absolute truth of the post, so we pull individual words from the post and claim victory. I can't wait to try it. Oh wait, I'd need to go get that lobotomy and some tights first.

Weak child, weak.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Even Bain, who are huge supporters of Obama and MAJOR contributors to his campaign say Romney left in '99. It's a no story, other than the fodder it gives the Republicans to lambaste the Dems on.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
That's awesome, is that the new game? Can't argue the absolute truth of the post, so we pull individual words from the post and claim victory. I can't wait to try it. Oh wait, I'd need to go get that lobotomy and some tights first.

Weak child, weak.
Click to expand...
MuyLocoNC said:
Yeah, I don't get my info from them. However, I do stand with the 31,000 American scientists that signed the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine's global warming petition against the horseshit that is MMGW. They must ALL be in the Koch brother's pocket.
Click to expand...
Robinson's paper claimed to show that pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is actually a good thing. "As atmospheric CO[SUB]2[/SUB] increases," it stated, "plant growth rates increase. Also, leaves lose less water as CO[SUB]2[/SUB] increases, so that plants are able to grow under drier conditions. Animal life, which depends upon plant life for food, increases proportionally." As a result, Robinson concluded, industrial activities can be counted on to encourage greater species biodiversity and a greener planet:
As coal, oil, and natural gas are used to feed and lift from poverty vast numbers of people across the globe, more CO[SUB]2[/SUB] will be released into the atmosphere. This will help to maintain and improve the health, longevity, prosperity, and productivity of all people.Human activities are believed to be responsible for the rise in CO[SUB]2[/SUB] level of the atmosphere. Mankind is moving the carbon in coal, oil, and natural gas from below ground to the atmosphere and surface, where it is available for conversion into living things. We are living in an increasingly lush environment of plants and animals as a result of the CO[SUB]2[/SUB] increase. Our children will enjoy an Earth with far more plant and animal life as [sic] that with which we now are blessed. This is a wonderful and unexpected gift from the Industrial Revolution.In reality, neither Robinson's paper nor OISM's petition drive had anything to do with the National Academy of Sciences, which first heard about the petition when its members began calling to ask if the NAS had taken a stand against the Kyoto treaty. Robinson was not even a climate scientist. He was a biochemist with no published research in the field of climatology, and his paper had never been subjected to peer review by anyone with training in the field. In fact, the paper had never been accepted for publication anywhere, let alone in the NAS Proceedings. It was self-published by Robinson, who did the typesetting himself on his own computer. (It was subsequently published as a "review" in Climate Research, which contributed to an editorial scandal at that publication.)
 
B

beenthere

New Member
Lefties are either unbelievably gullible or, they're so desperate, they are willing to go along with the cheating and lying for their candidate to win an election.

Ever wonder why the term "sheeple" came about.
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
its from the Boston Globe, I think that's the only source saying that but maybe I am wrong, was just one article. I don't care enough to investigate it, Good chance its a lie but Romney and Obama are both criminals I don't see why anyone cares or is surprised.
 
OLD DUDE

OLD DUDE

Active Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Even Bain, who are huge supporters of Obama and MAJOR contributors to his campaign say Romney left in '99. It's a no story, other than the fodder it gives the Republicans to lambaste the Dems on.
Click to expand...
He admits to being CEO but says he had nothing to do with day to day operations! That's the part I don't understand??
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Robinson's paper claimed to show that pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is actually a good thing. "As atmospheric CO[SUB]2[/SUB] increases," it stated, "plant growth rates increase. Also, leaves lose less water as CO[SUB]2[/SUB] increases, so that plants are able to grow under drier conditions. Animal life, which depends upon plant life for food, increases proportionally." As a result, Robinson concluded, industrial activities can be counted on to encourage greater species biodiversity and a greener planet:
As coal, oil, and natural gas are used to feed and lift from poverty vast numbers of people across the globe, more CO[SUB]2[/SUB] will be released into the atmosphere. This will help to maintain and improve the health, longevity, prosperity, and productivity of all people.Human activities are believed to be responsible for the rise in CO[SUB]2[/SUB] level of the atmosphere. Mankind is moving the carbon in coal, oil, and natural gas from below ground to the atmosphere and surface, where it is available for conversion into living things. We are living in an increasingly lush environment of plants and animals as a result of the CO[SUB]2[/SUB] increase. Our children will enjoy an Earth with far more plant and animal life as [sic] that with which we now are blessed. This is a wonderful and unexpected gift from the Industrial Revolution.In reality, neither Robinson's paper nor OISM's petition drive had anything to do with the National Academy of Sciences, which first heard about the petition when its members began calling to ask if the NAS had taken a stand against the Kyoto treaty. Robinson was not even a climate scientist. He was a biochemist with no published research in the field of climatology, and his paper had never been subjected to peer review by anyone with training in the field. In fact, the paper had never been accepted for publication anywhere, let alone in the NAS Proceedings. It was self-published by Robinson, who did the typesetting himself on his own computer. (It was subsequently published as a "review" in Climate Research, which contributed to an editorial scandal at that publication.)
Click to expand...
Are you still butthurt about losing your ass in the global warming thread? Still digging up articles from MMGW support sites?

And you highlighted a section of my post and then didn't even manage to disprove it. Losing sucks huh? Don't worry Duke, you'll actually reach an age that permits you to be on this site and hopefully in those many years until you do, you'll learn how to stay on subject. Maybe you should tell us how your "black" wife is a climatologist and "back when you were a kid" she used to tell you about Romney and his history with Bain.

Tool.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top