If they come for your guns, do you have a responsibility to fight?

[TroncoChe]

that's why i see no need for military grade weapons for civilians.

But with the wars that you didn't support during bush and now support with obama, you do see a reason for military to have them? To kill innocent people, right?

 

[UncleBuck]

You guys who wouldn't even try are more hilarious, have some backbone.

how smart would it be to die in vain? that's kind of stupid.

not only do you get nothing out of it, you're dead to boot.

 

[UncleBuck]

But with the wars that you didn't support during bush and now support with obama, you do see a reason for military to have them? To kill innocent people, right?

i think it's a good idea for the military to have military grade weapons.

 

[rooky1985]

that's why i see no need for military grade weapons for civilians.

The military uses a beretta matte 92fs handgun shall those be banned as well? Seals teams use remington model 700 (bolt action) what about those?

 

[TroncoChe]

i think it's a good idea for the military to have military grade weapons.

So if the military can start bull shit wars over seas, can they start one right here at home? And if they can, do you still not see a reason for people to have them?

 

[rooky1985]

*lose
*definitely
*totalitarian
*weapons
*a lot



i don't want to ban guns. you must have me confused with some imaginary person.

haven't noticed a totalitarian government either.

Pointing out mis-spelled words doesn't make you argument more valid ( I hope you know that).

 

[UncleBuck]

The military uses a beretta matte 92fs handgun shall those be banned as well? Seals teams use remington model 700 (bolt action) what about those?

are they made for wiping out people en masse in the quickest fashion possible? or are they more weapons of self defense?

 

[UncleBuck]

So if the military can start bull shit wars over seas, can they start one right here at home? And if they can, do you still not see a reason for people to have them?

you still think you stand a chance?

they have nukes. how many nukes do you have?

 

[UncleBuck]

Pointing out mis-spelled words doesn't make you argument more valid ( I hope you know that).

*misspelled
*your

 

[TroncoChe]

you still think you stand a chance?

they have nukes. how many nukes do you have?

It doesn't matter, as I said before, you don't know the point of guerrilla warfare.

 

[UncleBuck]

It doesn't matter, as I said before, you don't know the point of guerrilla warfare.

i know the point of it, you still wouldn't stand a chance though.

 

[rooky1985]

*misspelled
*your

Touche... to bad you would flea your grammar skills would be invaluable in a time of need, kind of like my guns LOL

 

[cannabineer]

suppose you're fighting a dragon. do you want a pencil or a cufflink?

For the dragon - the cufflink. Pencils in tiny crossbows are the sovereign remedy for vampire assault. cn

 

[UncleBuck]

Touche... to bad you would flea your grammar skills would be invaluable in a time of need, kind of like my guns LOL

*too
*flee

how useful will your guns be when you're dead?

 

[cannabineer]

so they can wipe out my kindergartener and his friends?

That is against the law. cn

 

[rooky1985]

are they made for wiping out people en masse in the quickest fashion possible? or are they more weapons of self defense?

All weapons could be construed as a weapon of self defense, my point is where is the line drawn? Ofcourse people would stand a chance, Nukes? Why would the government damage it's biggest investment U.S.A., this is a laughable suggestion.

 

[UncleBuck]

All weapons could be construed as a weapon of self defense, my point is where is the line drawn?

at self defense.

there's no reason for a civilian to have a weapon that is designed to wipe out as many humans as quickly as possible.

*Ofcourse people would stand a chance, Nukes? Why would the government damage it's biggest investment U.S.A., this is a laughable suggestion.

an insurrection is more of a liability than an asset.

 

[rooky1985]

For the dragon - the cufflink. Pencils in tiny crossbows are the sovereign remedy for vampire assault. cn

I was thinking of using the pencil as a wand and going Harry Potter on that dragons ass.

 

[cannabineer]

are they made for wiping out people en masse in the quickest fashion possible? or are they more weapons of self defense?

No dichotomy imo. They are the same.

N.b. you spoke about "military-grade weapons" earlier. The guns used at Sandy Hook were not "military grade" since they were "assault weapons" i.e. civilian-allowed guns the media seem to dislike. A true military-grade gun of that size and type would be a proper assault rifle, which would have burst and full on the selector as well as safe and semi-auto. And a bayonet. Assault rifles gots bayonets. cn

 

[rooky1985]

at self defense.

there's no reason for a civilian to have a weapon that is designed to wipe out as many humans as quickly as possible.



an insurrection is more of a liability than an asset.

All weapons have evolved to be more efficient killing machines.