Background checks for gun purchases?

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
Actually, IMO the courts went too far on this ruling.

Private businesses should be able to discriminate just as people have a right to boycott businesses. I dont think that violates anyone's rights. If I saw a store that said no colored people allowed, I wouldnt shop there anyway.

Where it starts getting into rights issues is in things like Real Estate. I do not have a problem with the anti-discrimination legislation in that area as people should be allowed to live where they want to and not be subject to segregation.
Click to expand...
of course it went too far in your opinion, you're one of those racist people. you assume that black people who are fleeing an area are deadly threats to the armed, violent people chasing them, too.

if you claim to be open to the public, you serve the public. segregation caused demonstrable harm.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
he said more than just that! care to include the rest?

you have no idea what i am capable of.
Click to expand...
His first sentences did not contradict the point I was making. Nobody is arguing that criminals or the mentally ill deserve to have firearms.

THe only other part
  • Carroll said Scalia's opinion also includes language that may help those who want restrictions on assault rifles and magazines that can hold large numbers of bullets.




    ​




 Is simply an opinion.... And thus has little value to me.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
His first sentences did not contradict the point I was making. Nobody is arguing that criminals or the mentally ill deserve to have firearms.

THe only other part
  • Carroll said Scalia's opinion also includes language that may help those who want restrictions on assault rifles and magazines that can hold large numbers of bullets.




    ​



    *

 Is simply an opinion.... And thus has little value to me.
Click to expand...
well, we know what you're NOT capable of then.

and you still have no idea what i am capable of.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
of course it went too far in your opinion, you're one of those racist people. you assume that black people who are fleeing an area are deadly threats to the armed, violent people chasing them, too.

if you claim to be open to the public, you serve the public. segregation caused demonstrable harm.
Click to expand...
I just wrote a post against segregation and you want to argue with me about segregation... Sometimes I think you just argue due to inertia...

If a private business owner chooses to be stupid, it is their right. Just like I feel that every private business should be able to decide whether they are a smoking establishment or not...
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
well, we know what you're NOT capable of then.

and you still have no idea what i am capable of.
Click to expand...

You are capable of repeating anything that happens to be bouncing around in your turrett like brain...

And probably 5 over par...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
I just wrote a post against segregation and you want to argue with me about segregation... Sometimes I think you just argue due to inertia...

If a private business owner chooses to be stupid, it is their right. Just like I feel that every private business should be able to decide whether they are a smoking establishment or not...
Click to expand...
except it's not a business deciding to be stupid, plenty of them thrived while denying service to black people. it was supposedly public businesses causing harm to one segment of the public.

next time you see a black person running away from a violent, armed person, make sure to call the cops on the black guy. he's an assault threat.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
except it's not a business deciding to be stupid, plenty of them thrived while denying service to black people. it was supposedly public businesses causing harm to one segment of the public.

next time you see a black person running away from a violent, armed person, make sure to call the cops on the black guy. he's an assault threat.
Click to expand...
Probably just a car thief...
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
I believe the Republican scum and Democrat scum are in this together with the same goals, and possibly slightly different ideas on how best to achieve them, but I believe both sides have been hijacked for the worse, and legitimate for the people candidates have little to no chance or at best will get elected and sidelined. I like Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich as different as they are and as much as you might detest them and as questionable as they may be on certain issues at least I think they mean well for the people they represent. I loved JFK and Bobby Kennedy would have been great, I also think Teddy Roosevelt was good, as different as they were, Now I think the "mainstream" of both parties is very much propaganda that does not benefit the people, the debate has been hijacked and is a distraction.
Click to expand...
Buck calles me a troll although i'm not trolling and then starts a conversation so I type out a heartfelt response about how I think they have turned politics into a two team sport and both teams are playing against us but we're expected to pick a team and support our team,
Then he ignores my post and leaves me hanging- trolling me on a very high level...
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
beardo said:
Buck calles me a troll although i'm not trolling and then starts a conversation so I type out a heartfelt response about how I think they have turned politics into a two team sport and both teams are playing against us but we're expected to pick a team and support our team,
Then he ignores my post and leaves me hanging- trolling me on a very high level...
Click to expand...
You try too hard :P
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
If you cause harm through your free speech, you've broken the law. Same with any right. You are free to own firearms as long as you conduct yourself as an adult.... oh, sorry, you don't know what that is like.
Click to expand...
Where does that come from Mr. Neutron, I conduct my self in a reasonable manner with you and all others here.
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
If you cause harm through your free speech, you've broken the law. Same with any right. You are free to own firearms as long as you conduct yourself as an adult.... oh, sorry, you don't know what that is like.
Click to expand...
And if you inadvertently allow another the use of your firearm, who is to blame for the result?
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Mr Neutron said:
Do you mean the right to end a life?



Yeah, an abortion is hardly invasive.



Only to those of limited capacity, who don't understand it or don't believe in it.



Oh but we do, you are totally wrong... as usual.
Click to expand...

The presumption here is a centristic one "If you don't interpret the Consitution as I do then you are obviously wrong".
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
Holy shit, is someone honestly complaining about a waiting period for abortions? I didn't think they had those. And if they do, and the woman is SO sure, why would it make a difference?
Click to expand...

They do have them. If a guy is SO sure he needs his weapon then why should a waiting period for a shotgun be any less or more onerous?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top