Republicans scared of Clinton?

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
The Republican National Committee voted unanimously this week to not allow any coverage of the Republican presidential primary debates by CNN or NBC in in 2016, because of those networks plans to have programs on Hillary Clinton next year. The RNC chairman, Reince Priebus, genius that he is, called it obviously "biased" and unfair. It seems to me that all this shows is that they are scared shitless of Clinton already, and does the nation a disservice by limiting the voters opportunity to see those debates, which everybody with a sense of humor loves. I just find it amazing that the Republicans actually think this is a good idea, but in my opinion they hardly ever have one anyway. I think it just make them look like bigger fools than they are now, if that is possible. I guess I'll just have to watch the clown act on Fox News now, unbiased that it is, to get my laughs at their candidates.:peace:
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
The Republican National Committee voted unanimously this week to not allow any coverage of the Republican presidential primary debates by CNN or NBC in in 2016, because of those networks plans to have programs on Hillary Clinton next year. The RNC chairman, Reince Priebus, genius that he is, called it obviously "biased" and unfair. It seems to me that all this shows is that they are scared shitless of Clinton already, and does the nation a disservice by limiting the voters opportunity to see those debates, which everybody with a sense of humor loves. I just find it amazing that the Republicans actually think this is a good idea, but in my opinion they hardly ever have one anyway. I think it just make them look like bigger fools than they are now, if that is possible. I guess I'll just have to watch the clown act on Fox News now, unbiased that it is, to get my laughs at their candidates.:peace:
I am afraid of what Hillary will act like when her husband comes home smelling like some other women's crotch.....
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
The Republican National Committee voted unanimously this week to not allow any coverage of the Republican presidential primary debates by CNN or NBC in in 2016, because of those networks plans to have programs on Hillary Clinton next year. The RNC chairman, Reince Priebus, genius that he is, called it obviously "biased" and unfair. It seems to me that all this shows is that they are scared shitless of Clinton already, and does the nation a disservice by limiting the voters opportunity to see those debates, which everybody with a sense of humor loves. I just find it amazing that the Republicans actually think this is a good idea, but in my opinion they hardly ever have one anyway. I think it just make them look like bigger fools than they are now, if that is possible. I guess I'll just have to watch the clown act on Fox News now, unbiased that it is, to get my laughs at their candidates.:peace:
How is Hillary any different than the dickwad the Republicans will eventually put out there? She likes to steal and lie for the things she wants, the Republican dickwad will like to lie and steal for the things he/she will want. What's the difference?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
The point is that the networks are advertising their bias by promoting a candidate through investing in flattering video's that are essentially infomercials for the hillary clinton presidential campaign. It doesnt benefit them if the moderators start chiming in like the dumb cunt in the last debate.

I dont see how it hurts the Republican party to choose not to participate. It would be like Mitt Romney trying to hold a debate on this forum.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It doesnt benefit them if the moderators start chiming in like the dumb cunt in the last debate.
dumb cunts chiming in with facts, ruining your complete and utter delusion.

at least that dumb cunt had the courtesy not to mention that iran borders the sea and that the polling data was legitimate, even though it made your vaginas all sore.

you guys never benefit from facts in any way whatsoever.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
dumb cunts chiming in with facts, ruining your complete and utter delusion.

at least that dumb cunt had the courtesy not to mention that iran borders the sea and that the polling data was legitimate, even though it made your vaginas all sore.

you guys never benefit from facts in any way whatsoever.
Moderators in debates are supposed to remain neutral. But if it supports your cause you dont care what laws are broken...

You call me gay and then accuse me of having a vagina... Am I a lesbian now?

I guess you have your sexuality all confused with your wife keeping your balls in her purse...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Moderators in debates are supposed to remain neutral. But if it supports your cause you dont care what laws are broken...

You call me gay and then accuse me of having a vagina... Am I a lesbian now?

I guess you have your sexuality all confused with your wife keeping your balls in her purse...
LOL!

what law did crowley break by pointing out facts in a dispassionate and neutral fashion, child?

you're just upset that the facts ruined the delusion you had built up around yourself last year.

now i'm gonna call you a faggot because apparently the other right wingers WON'T call me racist or a bigot if i call you a faggot.

thus, you are a faggot.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
LOL!

what law did crowley break by pointing out facts in a dispassionate and neutral fashion, child?

you're just upset that the facts ruined the delusion you had built up around yourself last year.

now i'm gonna call you a faggot because apparently the other right wingers WON'T call me racist or a bigot if i call you a faggot.

thus, you are a faggot.
Yeah, she tried to point out the facts and as proven later she was wrong... But hey, lets not let logic or reality infringe upon your liberal fantasy world...

Apparently your wife keeps your brain in her purse too... Probably in the coin purse so she cant lose it... The thing is so damn small...
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
LOL!

what law did crowley break by pointing out facts in a dispassionate and neutral fashion, child?

you're just upset that the facts ruined the delusion you had built up around yourself last year.

now i'm gonna call you a faggot because apparently the other right wingers WON'T call me racist or a bigot if i call you a faggot.

thus, you are a faggot.
Buck...

You are a bigot and a racist.....For some reason that felt good to say that...Now I know why Dems like to say those words, it's the feel good part...I really didn't know about that part of it until now...
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
How is Hillary any different than the dickwad the Republicans will eventually put out there? She likes to steal and lie for the things she wants, the Republican dickwad will like to lie and steal for the things he/she will want. What's the difference?
What do you do for a living?
What country is better than the USA and will you move there?
 

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
LOL!

what law did crowley break by pointing out facts in a dispassionate and neutral fashion, child?

you're just upset that the facts ruined the delusion you had built up around yourself last year.

now i'm gonna call you a faggot because apparently the other right wingers WON'T call me racist or a bigot if i call you a faggot.

thus, you are a faggot.
Its still bigoted. You bigot.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
How is Hillary any different than the dickwad the Republicans will eventually put out there? She likes to steal and lie for the things she wants, the Republican dickwad will like to lie and steal for the things he/she will want. What's the difference?
experience:wink:
 

woodsusa

Well-Known Member
If she gets elected president it may be time to retire to a foreign country. She's is unworthy of our nations highest office. She would be unworthy no matter what party she represented.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yeah, she tried to point out the facts and as proven later she was wrong...
"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for."

"We want to send a message all around the world — anybody who would do us harm: No act of terror will dim the light of the values that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will shake the resolve of the United States of America."

"I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world. No act of violence shakes the resolve of the United States of America."

you fucking idiot.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Of course they should be scared of Clinton. She's very formidable, very experienced and has the media doing work for her. We also need to check woman president off the countriy's bucket list.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Buck...

You are a bigot and a racist.....For some reason that felt good to say that...Now I know why Dems like to say those words, it's the feel good part...I really didn't know about that part of it until now...
Where have you been? He uses Biden talking points and calls Indians, "dot heads."
 
Top