NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Water resources being the biggest.
LOL!!! The planet is covered by 80% water. That resource is not the issue.
Water resources being the biggest.
LOL!!! The planet is covered by 80% water. That resource is not the issue.
You do realize that salt water is pretty difficult to turn into drinking water or to water plants with?
You do realize that salt water is pretty difficult to turn into drinking water or to water plants with?
Ignorance is the greatest threat, closely followed by fear.
And that is why I wish i could have found a relevant link. They had satellite photos; no irrigation. Hard to lie to a satellite.
Nonetheless i am sensitive to your argument. An awful lot gets fabricated and then passed off as first 'reasonable extrapolation' and then canon.
What are you talking about? Saltwater that has been turned into freshwater falls from the sky. No effort required.You do realize that salt water is pretty difficult to turn into drinking water or to water plants with?
What are you talking about? Saltwater that has been turned into freshwater falls from the sky. No effort required.
So you are denying that freshwater falls from the sky because it doesn't happen on the schedule you want it to?Oh, I forgot we can just make it rain where ever we want to and at any time that it is convenient. Red, what does everyone forget about Rain Control?
So you are denying that freshwater falls from the sky because it doesn't happen on the schedule you want it to?
I pointed out the supply of drinking water is infinite, but you keep insisting we will run out. Chicken Little cries of doom are deserving of derision.Don't start with that. You can't hurt me, silly boy. Your are just deflecting now. You threw stupidity in. We are talking about the real problem with fresh water resources and you took a shit on that with, a very sophomoric comment.
See, my dyslexia read that as cannon. I thought, what a delicious pun!
IAC, I have trained my self over the years to be quite disbelieving of all Popular wisdom of, this and that. And it began for me, with Saganism. It was what I cottoned to first, as they say. Then when I looked at Scientology, I realized, yes, it is possible to just make stuff up. Then the Cold Fusion joke. Then I caught onto lying for a living in sales and that lead me to see that Lying is a high art indeed. And I realized it is the stock in trade for Lawyers and Politicos, and, yes, Astronomer Sell Outs.
Lately there has been real breakthroughs in Brain wave decoding, the first thought controlled devices, etc. And what is the premise, the bedrock of this research?
We all lie constantly. (finally science gets the obvious)
IAC, I was trying to find that Sahara Goat experiment. It sounds like rich fodder for my point. But, I found something better. Another goat experiment, in another desert. A desertification in Poland? Really? Yes, something about mining in the 1300, called the Bledow.
IAC, they have been dealing with it and thought in 50s it was just about recovered. But, now they want to save the Desert of Poland. It was never a natural desert and was re-claiming itself, but now they want it back as sand. Go figure.
So, Saganism says goats create desert by eating all the plants. And if you bring in goats you get your desert back...hey, they are Polish.
But, that idea is as WRONG as Cold Fusion. See? Goats don't create desert, quite the opposite. They create the FIM induced wild growth from close cropping.
So, just more Saganism.
http://the-magazine.org/25/just-desert#.UrxCR4CrTIU
The first attempt involved goats. In 2010, Silesia district authorities hired 100 goats for the job of expanding and enhancing the desert. The projects initial managers found goats terrifically successful at chomping down the scrub and grasses that bloomed across the desert floor.
Too soon they also discovered that although the animals proved adept at destroying leaves and stalks, they were less skilled at consuming root systems. An area of goat-cleared land, briefly and beautifully a desert once more, sprouted fresh shrubs and saplings as soon as the goats relocated to fresh pasture.
Verdict: disaster.
Yes, heavy industrialization in 13,000 BC caused a rise in sea levels. Derp DerHere is an interesting history of the Environment. Seems widely acceptable enough to make Wikipedia. Here is just an excerpt. Of note, the rapid increase in temps in the Antarctic foresaw, the sea level min and glacier max in only 1000 years. A tiny warm up like we see today, could mean we are crashing back to Ice. But, then only 6000 years later, a 20 meter sea rise. And we think We have anything to do with it? Nonsense. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_environmental_history [TABLE="class: wikitable"] [TR] [TD="colspan: 2, align: center"]c. 20,000 BC[/TD] [TD]Antarctica sees a very rapid and abrupt +6 °C increase in temperatures[SUP][2][/SUP][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="colspan: 2, align: center"]c. 19,000 BC[/TD] [TD]Last Glacial Maximum/sea-level minimum[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]c. 20,000 BC[/TD] [TD]c. 12,150 BC[/TD] [TD]Mesolithic 1 period[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]c. 17,000 BC[/TD] [TD]c. 13,000 BC[/TD] [TD]Oldest Dryas stadial (cool period) during the last Ice age/glaciation in Europe.[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="colspan: 2, align: center"]c. 13,000 BC[/TD] [TD]Beginning of the Holocene extinction. Earliest evidence of warfare. Meltwater pulse 1A rises sea level 20 meters. [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE]
I pointed out the supply of drinking water is infinite, but you keep insisting we will run out. Chicken Little cries of doom are deserving of derision.