sheskunk
Well-Known Member
The control I have over you is amazing. It's actually a really good start to what will become a wonderful relationship. You are learning well, young one. Stick this out and I may make you into a respectable human being.
The farce behind liberal, "I'll tax you again" global warming bullshit - volcanoes!
- Thread starter Uncle Ben
- Start date
The control I have over you is amazing. It's actually a really good start to what will become a wonderful relationship. You are learning well, young one. Stick this out and I may make you into a respectable human being.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
not a single thing you said was true, but unfortunately, it's 100% true when i note the fedora, the belly, the live in mother, the walmart job, and so much more.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
we've already established that your 3000 number was a fabrication
why do you instist on still using it? dont you ever ask yourself why you need to make numbers up to prove your point?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
you established no such thing.
you assume so because i dont feel like digging up the previous source for you, and youre too lazy stupid and illiterate to find it yourself.
thus what we have established is, youre a cunt.
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
You were more than happy to trot out multitude of links that said you were wrong
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
nope, i "trotted out" a shitload of links to educate your ignorant ass in the facts.
Noteably:
1 : the definition of a "volcano" is not fixed a feature that one geologist calls a volcano could be dismissed as simply a part of another volcano 10 miles away
2 : the definition of "active" varies wildly
3 : youre a cunt.
4 : i would dig that source up again for nearly anybody except you, on account of your cuntishness.
5 : the country of Chile has more than 3000 volcanoes all by itself. http://www.weather.com/news/science/incredible-photos-chilean-volcano-erupting-20140225
6 : other sources say chile has 500 volcanoes, with only 36 of them "historically active" (which means they have erupted with Magma sometime in the last 10k years)
7 : all sources agree though, youre a cunt.
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
I've seen active (currently interrupting and active within the last 10000 described from the nasa link I posted first thru all the copy pastas you deluged thread with
Your at the least conflating the active in last 10000 years and claiming they really are active all the time
Who needs data behind them when name calling can negate need for evidence
Do you even bother reading links or you deliberately trying to lie?
bbc says
[/QUOTE]
You really need to stop playing fast and loose with volcano definitions if you want to bitch about uncertainty
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the "definition" of a "volcano" is already loose.
some geologists call many features connected to the same magma source ONE volcano, others call them MANY volcanoes.
even geologists cant agree but what they all CAN agree on, is that theres are many many many geologic features which produce substantial levels of co2, even without an "eruption"
and then theres the classification of an "eruption"
some geologists call the farting of mt aetna in 2004-2005 an "eruption" while others insist it wasnt, cuz there was no Magma
i know you want to wear the big boy trousers and tell everybody how things are gonna have to be, but i dont really care if you take your toys and go home.
cuz youre a cunt
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
The only person being loose with definition is yourself
All the copy pastas you posted have similar numbers and definitions for active and active in last 10000 years
You have yet to show 1 reputable geologist claim there are 3000 active (as in right now 24/7/365)
As in you play fast and loose not them
As with the nasa link and your copy pastas they give a much much smaller number of erupting volcanos vs active or active in last 10000years
And again not any of them are 3000
Playing fast and loose with eruption definition doesn't solve your active definition problems
But all geologists happily class it as active so this is red herring
If you want to spend 30 pages making up math to support your bullshit then it's up to you to make sure the numbers you use are correct no?
Similar threads
