Are you ready for some real BS?

Roger A. Shrubber said:
my empirical evidence is as good as yours....you don't have any...at least i talk to Canadians on a regular basis.....




making a lot of assumptions....and while you haven't said "FUCK Canada!"...you don't seem to be in favor of them in general....this ^ certainly seems like an antagonistic stance.....based on....not talking to any Canadians ever, as far as i can tell.....

and look into spellcheck.....
Click to expand...
you are still assume allot lol. can you try and make a comment without an assumption as it's focal point?
 
Last edited:
Budley Doright said:
“Substance” is not offering “possibilities”. And now your feelings are hurt because your comment was called out for being bullshit. Please try harder.
Click to expand...
i said possibilities because conclusions from data are subjective, especially in this situation. so becuase i interpret the data different and lay out why i am somehow doing something different than you ppl? i hate to tell you you are all interpreting data in your own bias way the same as me or anyone else. the issue here tho is you cannot handle a debate or a differing conclusion. you like to throw around words like "facts" but you only cite opinion when drawing a conclusion, then you proceed to lambaste me for the same. i believe that is called being a hypocrite among other things
 
outliergenetix said:
i said possibilities because conclusions from data are subjective, especially in this situation. so becuase i interpret the data different and lay out why i am somehow doing something different than you ppl? i hate to tell you you are all interpreting data in your own bias way the same as me or anyone else. the issue here tho is you cannot handle a debate or a differing conclusion. you like to throw around words like "facts" but you only cite opinion when drawing a conclusion, then
Click to expand...
The only actual fact I offered is the sex registry and the sharing of a data base. You on the other hand offer, “but i am not "looking up facts" to make my point.” I’m not sure what the point of your original post was. I guess maybe to say our Country has issues too? Does that make you feel better? You used a child’s argument as an example, I’m getting it now, thanks.
Edit: still waiting to hear about the attack on our freedoms?
 
Budley Doright said:
The only actual fact I offered is the sex registry and the sharing of a data base. You on the other hand offer, “but i am not "looking up facts" to make my point.” I’m not sure what the point of your original post was. I guess maybe to say our Country has issues too? Does that make you feel better? You used a child’s argument as an example, I’m getting it now, thanks.
Edit: still waiting to hear about the attack on our freedoms?
Click to expand...
yea you forgot i said PUBLIC sex offender registry. meaning the citizens can look it up not only law enforcement. <<<< fact
i also said in 2014(poss) 2013 there was a long wait for necessary treatments. i said i was not looking it up because i have no interest doing your work or proving to some knucklehead in a forum i have "evidence" because he is too lazy to confrim it for himself. i already looked it up before i wrote the original comment, <<<< another fact
my guess is if i provided the link you would take some issue with the source anyway because you clearly are not interested in keeping any kind of open mind, you just want to be right. me i am agnostic in most things. idc about proving my correctness as it is just opinion as i said. anyone can cite and twist statistics so i won't play that game and provide a bibliography for you ppl
... so keep twisting "sound bites" from my comments into something you think benerfits your argument instead of trying to understand the larger point being made
 
outliergenetix said:
yea you forgot i said PUBLIC sex offender registry. meaning the citizens can look it up not only law enforcement. <<<< fact
i also said in 2014(poss) 2013 there was a long wait for necessary treatments. i said i was not looking it up because i have no interest doing your work or proving to some knucklehead in a forum i have "evidence" because he is too lazy to confrim it for himself. i already looked it up before i wrote the original comment, <<<< another fact
my guess is if i provided the link you would take some issue with the source anyway because you clearly are not interested in keeping any kind of open mind, you just want to be right. me i am agnostic in most things. idc about proving my correctness as it is just opinion as i said. anyone can cite and twist statistics so i won't play that game and provide a bibliography for you ppl
... so keep twisting "sound bites" from my comments into something you think benerfits your argument instead of trying to understand the larger point being made
Click to expand...
“I have proof and evidence but I’m not gonna show it to you!”
 
outliergenetix said:
yea you forgot i said PUBLIC sex offender registry. meaning the citizens can look it up not only law enforcement. <<<< fact
i also said in 2014(poss) 2013 there was a long wait for necessary treatments. i said i was not looking it up because i have no interest doing your work or proving to some knucklehead in a forum i have "evidence" because he is too lazy to confrim it for himself. i already looked it up before i wrote the original comment, <<<< another fact
my guess is if i provided the link you would take some issue with the source anyway because you clearly are not interested in keeping any kind of open mind, you just want to be right. me i am agnostic in most things. idc about proving my correctness as it is just opinion as i said. anyone can cite and twist statistics so i won't play that game and provide a bibliography for you ppl
... so keep twisting "sound bites" from my comments into something you think benerfits your argument instead of trying to understand the larger point being made
Click to expand...
Ok what is your point. I’m pretty sure I’ve been trying to establish that. I even asked a couple of times ......
 
outliergenetix said:
yea you forgot i said PUBLIC sex offender registry. meaning the citizens can look it up not only law enforcement. <<<< fact
i also said in 2014(poss) 2013 there was a long wait for necessary treatments. i said i was not looking it up because i have no interest doing your work or proving to some knucklehead in a forum i have "evidence" because he is too lazy to confrim it for himself. i already looked it up before i wrote the original comment, <<<< another fact
my guess is if i provided the link you would take some issue with the source anyway because you clearly are not interested in keeping any kind of open mind, you just want to be right. me i am agnostic in most things. idc about proving my correctness as it is just opinion as i said. anyone can cite and twist statistics so i won't play that game and provide a bibliography for you ppl
... so keep twisting "sound bites" from my comments into something you think benerfits your argument instead of trying to understand the larger point being made
Click to expand...
Yeah, so about that list of sex offenders?

Yeah, it's a burden they have to carry for the rest of their life. Just like the trauma the kid will carry. Sex offenders are notorious about re-offending and parents of young kids should have the right to know if the neighbor has a history of that. If you want to complain about the unfairness of public reactions, you'd have a valid point. But the list? There are good reasons for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top