Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
you boys having fun jerking each other off?
when you decide to address my arguments rather than your re-interpretation of those arguments, let me know.
Entitlement
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
you boys having fun jerking each other off?
when you decide to address my arguments rather than your re-interpretation of those arguments, let me know.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i cited that study mere weeks after it came out, you fucking retard.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/obama-asks-congress-to-go-to-war.715485/page-4#post-9557245
don't blame your stupidity on anything else other than YOU, for it is YOU who is unrelentingly stupid.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you don't have an argument, just a lot of bullshit that you fling.
how does one rebut projectile feces?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
ohh my, you linked to Thinkprogress in another thread, who in turn ACTUALLY linked to the source (which is amazing) some weeks ago
in a thread which i did not participate in.
so why all the bullshit linking to millbank, and through his fail ass blog to scribd, and from scribd to... NOTHING?
because you didnt ever actually look a the poll you thought was so important.
so important is spent pages on opinions of duck dynasty, drew brees, mother theresa and jesus.
trenchant stuff there.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
actually, slinging feces is your preferred method of argument.
my arguments are rational, and based in fact.
and i actually read the material relating to said arguments.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you're a smug, insufferable, whiny little twat, especially when you are wrong.
i'm thinking about letting you be right since you are less of a cunt that way, but then i'd have to eschew all my knowledge of basic exponents, order of operations, basic everyday knowledge beyond a 5th grade level, and common sense.
i'd also have to burn my dictionaries, which would require a permit from the fire department and boulder county.
so fuck that, you can keep being a miserable wrongheaded twat who is too much a prick to say "wooops you were right".
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
OMFG you have got to be kidding me.
you have been caught lying about "leftist fraud", termite farts, basic exponential math, forest fires and global cooling, and a thousand and one other things (like saying philippe rushton isn't racist) over and over and over again.
your arguments are INVARIABLY lies waiting to be exposed.
and you are a piece of shit.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
bu$hleaguer
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Just like you read Orwell when you thought he wasn't a socialist or Clemens when you couldn't spell his name. So all those times when prevalent logic trumped your fallacies and you resorted to some variation of "you're a marxist" that wasn't shit slinging.
How about in this thread when presented with academic historical research papers to back my argument, when you maintained nonetheless that profit was not privatized along with the rest of the industries that the fascist regimes privatized? Still no credible citation I see.
You have all the sound reasoning of a child who believes he's a helicopter.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
And over and over and over and over and over
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
my hobby is explaining the nature of marxism to morons who didnt read the material, and dont understand the underlying assumptions that makes marx's assertions so terribly wrong.
it's a lot of fun, especially when they try to explain how Benito Mussolini isnt a marxist any more, through a tortured series of No True Scotsman fallacies and references to bullshit student projects from a community college in the most heavily marxist area of spain, catalonia.
it's even better when they try to explain why fascism isnt based on marx because Mussolini and Hitler transferred nominal (read as; In Name Only) ownership to party apparatchiks who operated those industries under direct government control, and only pocketed a slice of the profits from said industries, while the lion's share went to the state.
and of course if those apparatchiks failed to deliver, "their" shit was taken away and given to another member of the party's top echelon, in what rational economists call a "Franchise" (as the US does with the public airwaves)
this simple shit is so easy to understand, that even a child can grasp it.
if you "give" a child a bicycle, contingent upon their performing certain chores, and stipulate that if they fail to perform those chores, their bicycle privileges will be rescinded, you have granted the child a Bicycle Franchise, not ownership of a bicycle. Franchises are at their very heart, Socialist in nature, in that actual ownership of the property remains with the state, as does ultimate control of said property. this does not mean the child cannot take on a paper route and thus profit from the bicycle, it simply means his bicycle privileges are contingent on the approval of the state. ergo: Socialism
if however, a child performs chores for pay, and uses that pay to purchase a bicycle, thats capitalism. the child may use that bicycle in whatever manner he chooses, and if he wrecks it trying to jump over a storm sewer, he loses his bicycle, and must save up to buy another, and in the future, he will, hopefully, have learned not to try and jump over storm sewers.
if however mummy and daddy pat him on the head and buy him a new bicycle, well, that's socialism too, and he will almost certainly be out there at the storm sewer tomorrow, ready to try again, since there is no penalty for failure.
yep, even children understand this shit better than bucky, ac and pada.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
still failing to grasp what i learned when i was 8 ehh?
give it another decade or so.
maybe youll figure it out.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
very funny.
however, in reality:
state ownership of "the means of production" is always socialist
state control of "the means of production" is always socialist
state interference in markets is Often socialist (but not always)
socialists dont own the concepts of standards, trade regulations, laws, public works, community projects, infrastructure, minimum wages, or in fact anything dealing with economics.
marx's theories really just boil down to feudalism, where the king owns everyone, and everything and he apportions out Franchises (there's that word again) for management and the right to skim a little off the top for ones' self (which are revokable, with or without cause) to various members of the society who hold his favour, provided they make their payments, and obey his commands.
marx prettied feudalism up, combed it's hair, dressed it in a new pinafore, and named it after himself, but it's still the same old shit, with the same utopian promise at the end of the rainbow, but unlike feudalism, you dont have to die to get to paradise, but just like feudalism, the paradise is equally imaginary.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
I was shooting for a couple chuckles.
I thought the Marxist Commie Pinko gave it that climactic touch of realism.
Oh oh... not that!
Indeed!
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
ohh.. well played sir.
because i expect more from you, you have successfully subverted my expectations for comedic result.
bravo, you rustled my jimmies.
you rustled them good.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Crafting.