first lawsuit for 6 year old sand hook student

UNICRONLIVES

UNICRONLIVES

Well-Known Member
In China the grade schools look like Maxiumum State Prisons!!


guns.jpeg

there are Whackos everywhere you turn..best advice ever givin to me was.."Boy!, if you wanna stay ALIVE!..be AWARE of your surroundings at all times!"
 
X

xKuroiTaimax

Well-Known Member
Well law enforcement and security needs guns... What if high school and college students want to carry an arsenal ofmweaponsmto 'protect themselves though?

The UK is trying desperately to get weapons of the street but the fact every kid thinks they need a weapon to protect themselves, they are attacking eachother as a knee jerk reaction because they anticipate the other person has a weapon... The 'attack first' mentality.. Perhaps the school security office should have guns.. Doesn't mean everyone should be allowed to wander around with the, though.
 
B

bde0001

New Member
lol wow. how is 100 mil supposed to make up for your child possibly being shot? Sounds like these parents said OH! we can sue ! and we can probably win. They're money hungry and taking advantage of the situation. Thats wrong. But hey, its smart if you wanna make money. Still very very wrong though.
 
UNICRONLIVES

UNICRONLIVES

Well-Known Member
xKuroiTaimax said:
Well law enforcement and security needs guns... What if high school and college students want to carry an arsenal ofmweaponsmto 'protect themselves though?

The UK is trying desperately to get weapons of the street but the fact every kid thinks they need a weapon to protect themselves, they are attacking eachother as a knee jerk reaction because they anticipate the other person has a weapon... The 'attack first' mentality.. Perhaps the school security office should have guns.. Doesn't mean everyone should be allowed to wander around with the, though.
Click to expand...
because your basically giving them a license to kill w/o teaching them the cost/value of life!! its rape THEN pillage..not pillage THEN rape...Even people in the 1500s knew this..
 
W

Whiteboy420

Member
No one else gets gets money when one of their loved ones is murdered so why should they. And blaming the goverment for some crazy persons actions is even dummer
 
mysunnyboy

mysunnyboy

Well-Known Member
xKuroiTaimax said:
Such a complicated business. I still feel indebted to my parents for all the research and visits and entrance exams and interviewing processes they had to hel me with just considering a school let alone the final administration process. Big decisions but ultimately a school experience could just be what the child makes of it depending on circumstances. It's no small task.

I wish all parents everywhere the best with the erupts business of sending their child to a good school, or finding them a place at school at all..

MySunnyBoy, if no amount of money would make up for it, why are they asking? Parents the world over have experienced the pain of losing a child, which NO parent should ever face, and my prayers go out for the void in their lives and hearts that must torment them every day. But not every parent seeks monetary compensation for it, or such an amount that most people could never hope to see in their wildest dreams, not just covering things like funeral costs and counselling or even a family vacation to help keep their minds off it all.

Is this lawsuit about parents who lost their child or their child was simply there though..

I don't mean to sound I sensitive but money doesn't fix everything .. It helps, but extortionate amounts of money fix nothing.
Click to expand...
it's punitive, it's meant to make a statement :eyesmoke:


EDIT: IT IS PUNITIVE AND MEANT TO MAKE A STATEMENT


anyone who has kids knows that they aren't doing this for the money
 
mysunnyboy

mysunnyboy

Well-Known Member
Whiteboy420 said:
Thats bull all they want is money or why do it. Who does it help
Click to expand...
IT IS PUNITIVE, TO AMPLIFY THE IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING OUR KIDS SAFE

you know what punitive means right?

jesus h christ do you really think they want MONEY??!!!

you have any kids whiteboy?

:eyesmoke:
 
X

xKuroiTaimax

Well-Known Member
He has a point. Should everyone who is a victim or the family of a victim be compensated for something that was not the fault of the setting of the crime. Perhaps if the ones suing had lost their child it would be different, but parents who should be grateful their child is safe and well can't justify taking that ridiculous amount of money from the state. If it is ok for then I 'm sure I could think of a fair few things I could sue over but it would just hurt people and infrastructure.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
silasraven said:
http://news.yahoo.com/claim-seeks-100-million-child-survivor-connecticut-school-003646074.html

well looks like the parents are filing for 100 mill for their child for not being in a safe learning environment. they have every right to every last cent for this. not much could have been done to prevent it. but still this is what states need to have funds ready for. i hope that child gets all the money for college,car,school,house and a future where she never has to do a thing ever again if she so chooses. that is permanent damage no one could ever forget not matter how much weed you smoke.God bless that family with a win of the lawsuit


MERIDEN, Connecticut (Reuters) - A $100 million claim on behalf of a 6-year-old survivor is the first legal action to come out of the Connecticut school shooting that left 26 children and adults dead two weeks ago.
The unidentified client, referred to as Jill Doe, heard "cursing, screaming, and shooting" over the school intercom when the gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, opened fire, according to the claim filed by New Haven-based attorney Irv Pinsky.
"As a consequence, the ... child has sustained emotional and psychological trauma and injury, the nature and extent of which are yet to be determined," the claim said.
Pinsky said he filed a claim on Thursday with state Claims Commissioner J. Paul Vance Jr., whose office must give permission before a lawsuit can be filed against the state.
"We all know its going to happen again," Pinsky said on Friday. "Society has to take action."
Twenty children and six adults were shot dead on December 14 at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The children were all 6 and 7 years old.
Pinsky's claim said that the state Board of Education, Department of Education and Education Commissioner had failed to take appropriate steps to protect children from "foreseeable harm."
It said they had failed to provide a "safe school setting" or design "an effective student safety emergency response plan and protocol."
Pinsky said he was approached by the child's parents within a week of the shooting.
Click to expand...
I am highlighting this post's central contradiction (before having read the thread, so if I am repeating, apologies). Since it could not reasonably have been prevented (the opinions of certain Politics luminaries notwithstanding), how can we argue that the parents DESERVE a huge settlement? Basically who DESERVES to be punished for this if even OP admits not much could have been done?

Civil awards are to redress reparable liabilities. The big hurricane ... Sandy, was it? did tremendous damage, but did anyone sue? No, because it wasn't anyone's fault. The two candidates for fault (the perp obviously, and his mother whom the media vampires would blame for his actions had he not murdered her himself) are unavailable here.

This is too primitive to even be called common sense. And yet attorneys: adults with good educations and great verbal skills ... are actively distracting us from this as they bend truth and decency in pursuit of the Only Thing, money. Feh and harumph. cn
 
X

xKuroiTaimax

Well-Known Member
It doesn't change the fact they are asking for money from people who were not at fault. It demonstrates nothing constructive and fixes nothing. I feel sorry for the children, but like I said, what if we all decided to sue for something or other.
 
mysunnyboy

mysunnyboy

Well-Known Member
i don't understand why you don't get this
it's not about money
they want our children safe
:eyesmoke:



*gives up and walks away from this thread*
 
UNICRONLIVES

UNICRONLIVES

Well-Known Member
mysunnyboy said:
i don't understand why you don't get this
it's not about money
they want our children safe
:eyesmoke:




*gives up and walks away from this thread*
Click to expand...

i have 1 daughter..my only child!! and no matter how she dies..I aint suing anyone for anything!!...unless I wanted/or needed(not that I dont)...MONEY. I will tell you I wouldnt and couldnt function normal or at all so i might lose things like my job or house. but i would as a human rather have done that than to sue and make it look as if i gave two shits about her and sue for a ridiculous amount of MONEY and say" our kids need to be safer"...no shit!! I see you sunny as bein 1 of the first parents jumpin on that wagon. sad to me:finger: where do u think that money comes from?..taxpayers? since your in favor of it then ask the government to withhold more than usual for that fund..as for me!? Im strapped as far as taxes are concerned..already have enough thanx!!
 
W

Whiteboy420

Member
Yes i have six kids and five grand kids what is your point i still want to know how this helps anyone it dosnt bring them back and who is going to pay for it people like you and me more taxes so they can pay for stupid shit like this to take place.
 
racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
mysunnyboy said:
do you really think it's about money people?
:eyesmoke:
Click to expand...
come on sunny.. if it wasn't about money, why not sue for $1?? it would still get what you say is their real point across, and yet they wouldn't be getting rich in the process..
you do know you can sue someone without doing so for 100 mill imo...


it's disgusting.. these people are trying to profit off of a horrific incident.. in my eyes, they're no better then the guy who pulled the trigger..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top