Global Warming or Over Population - Earths Biggest Threat?

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
did i once put 7 zeroes when there should have been 9? wow, that's damning.

that's almost as bad as going on for months about how polling data was a liberal conspiracy.
Actually, what was credibility damaging was the string of insults and smug, condescending comments you spewed while insisting you were smarter than the average bear and how ND and myself were complete idiots. Right before it finally dawned on you that the actual idiot was staring back at you in the mirror. Would you like to see the exchange? I have it saved for special occasions.

I guess you you didn't want to talk about the simple division cockup.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Actually, what was credibility damaging was the string of insults and smug, condescending comments you spewed while insisting you were smarter than the average bear and how ND and myself were complete idiots. Right before it finally dawned on you that the actual idiot was staring back at you in the mirror. Would you like to see the exchange? I have it saved for special occasions.

I guess you you didn't want to talk about the simple division cockup.
Buck is good at division, just not the mathematical kind.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Oh, I saw it alright. Even commented on it. So, as stated, the first three are fuckall. Boohoo, my summer home is gonna be flooded in 100 years. Boohoo, we have to take some measures to protect large cities and we only have a century to get it done. Whimper, this group has to move a smidge inland over 100 years to keep their feet dry. Yeah, not tugging at my heart strings AT ALL.

As to the others, changing climate patterns? Wow, that couldn't be more vague. Changes to agriculture? Gonna lose on that one all
day, hoss. Ocean acidification, really? Might have something there if there's ANYTHING substantial to back up that claim. I'd be interested to see something on that. Anyone got a link?
Just think of all the new farmland we get in Siberia and central Canada. It's going to be super!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
As to the others, changing climate patterns? Wow, that couldn't be more vague. Changes to agriculture? Gonna lose on that one all day, hoss. Ocean acidification, really? Might have something there if there's ANYTHING substantial to back up that claim. I'd be interested to see something on that. Anyone got a link?
yeah, it's probably all gonna be harmless, hence why they have scientists working on how to mitigate the impending costly and humanitarian crises that global warming will bring.

and you didn't know about ocean acidification, yet you are the expert here?

jesus christ, it doesn't get any more clown shoes than this.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Actually, what was credibility damaging was the string of insults and smug, condescending comments you spewed while insisting you were smarter than the average bear and how ND and myself were complete idiots. Right before it finally dawned on you that the actual idiot was staring back at you in the mirror. Would you like to see the exchange? I have it saved for special occasions.

I guess you you didn't want to talk about the simple division cockup.
everyone makes a mistake here and there, only idiots go on about conspiracies claiming the liberal media is pumping out fake polls for months.
 

beenthere

New Member
everyone makes a mistake here and there, only idiots go on about conspiracies claiming the liberal media is pumping out fake polls for months.
Hey Bucky, you think your multimillionaire father in-law brags about your 50,000 posts on RIU at his board meetings?
Just askin.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Hey Bucky, you think your multimillionaire father in-law brags about your 50,000 posts on RIU at his board meetings?
Just askin.
what board meetings? he owns apartment complexes. i'm already familiar with every detail of maintaining, leasing, running and every other aspect of the business. it's easy fucking stuff.

ya know what he does with tax stuff? he gives it to his CPA.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
yeah, it's probably all gonna be harmless, hence why they have scientists working on how to mitigate the impending costly and humanitarian crises that global warming will bring.

and you didn't know about ocean acidification, yet you are the expert here?

jesus christ, it doesn't get any more clown shoes than this.
Speaking of clown shoes, I think you're probably a type 7 Enthusiast in a level 9 state acting out as a type 1.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
sounds like the sort of labels you'd pick up in a militant vegan cult.
Now I think you're lying about having a Jewish psychiatrist wife. Otherwise you'd know what I'm talking about. My label is a type 4 Individualist who lashes out as a type 2 Helper at people like you.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
yeah, it's probably all gonna be harmless, hence why they have scientists working on how to mitigate the impending costly and humanitarian crises that global warming will bring.

and you didn't know about ocean acidification, yet you are the expert here?

jesus christ, it doesn't get any more clown shoes than this.
It's hard to put into words how stupid, vague and unsatisfactory that explanation is as a justification for implementing all the hair-brained "fixes" that the zealots seek.

Know plenty about ocean acidification, asked for something more substantial than taking YOUR word for it that a gradual increase in global temperatures is going to send it spiraling out of control. I never claimed to be an expert. However, we know for a fucking fact YOU aren't. So yeah, a link would be helpful.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
stupid, vague and unsatisfactory
nothing would satisfy you, you have already stated as much. you're perfectly fine with mass evacuations of major population centers should it happen.

i wasn't gonna write a thesis so i was concise, not vague.

and why is it stupid? is it because you have switched from calling global warming a hoax to saying the hoax will be beneficial? does that make you grumpy, sport?


hair-brained
*hare brained

the zealots
idiots like you who (once) said that global warming was a hoax (before realizing how stupid it made you sound) are the true zealots, and i share your frustration with them.

i just wish we could look at the science.

So yeah, a link would be helpful.
you first with those predictions i have been waiting for. it's been months now, ferry.

let's see all those predictions you talked about. i expect something scientific, not a google search from right wing blogs, like the dean chambers shit you went off on for months.

thanks in advance.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Now you can address my question. Tell me why I should give a shit and deal with the consequences of the solutions, rather than enjoying the gradual increase in global temperature. And don't bother with the one's I've put in bold text in my post I provided, surely there must be earth shattering ramifications beyond oceans creeping inland over the next century. Let'r rip.
Real easy question to answer.

Becuase Global warming will negativly affect you for the reasons you have already stated and more.
You are right. It is a easy question to answer. The hard part is for you to understand the ramifications of it
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Real easy question to answer.

Becuase Global warming will negativly affect you for the reasons you have already stated and more.
You are right. It is a easy question to answer. The hard part is for you to understand the ramifications of it
And global cooling will do demonstrably more damage via glaciers and 1/2 of the planet being uninhabitable.

The hard part is figuring out why you cannot grasp this relatively simple concept.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
And global cooling will do demonstrably more damage via glaciers and 1/2 of the planet being uninhabitable.

The hard part is figuring out why you cannot grasp this relatively simple concept.
I grasp the concept. Can you demonstrate if global cooling is occurring?

Can you build a better straw man?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
I grasp the concept. Can you demonstrate if global cooling is occurring?

Can you build a better straw man?
The globe hasnt warmed for 15 years and all of the models that the global warming scientists have built have not matched the current situation.

Instead of being scientists and fixing the model they declare reality to be broken... LOL!!!

I can demonstrate by pointing out that we break thousands of high and low records in the country per year that mathematically we have an incredibly small data sample and do not know what the highs and lows are supposed to be.

It is not a straw man when demonstrably there have been cyclical ice ages on the planet and everyone agrees we are in a warming cycle in between two of these.

Nobody knows when the next ice age will start but we do know there will be one. So far, all that the global warming scientists have provided is hot air and broken theoretical models.

BTW, the scientists that were recently stuck in the ice that was so thick they couldnt get out and their rescuers couldnt get out and THEIR rescuers couldnt get out... WERE GLOBAL WARMING SCIENTISTS!!! Not something the liberal media is going to tell you.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
nothing would satisfy you, you have already stated as much. you're perfectly fine with mass evacuations of major population centers should it happen.
Now it's SHOULD? If it's not 100% in your mind, wtf are we debating? Your argument relies on that as an absolute, don't go bending on that now. I would assert a slow creeping rise of the oceans over 50-100 years offers more than enough time for physical solutions that wouldn't require a "mass evacuation" and the hysteria and chaos that claim tries to bring to mind.

and why is it stupid? is it because you have switched from calling global warming a hoax to saying the hoax will be beneficial? does that make you grumpy, sport?
Apparently you reading compensation has failed you?

And I'm not changing gears at all, MMGW is complete horseshit. I'm just giving a momentary pause in the argument to see if ANYONE can provide a simple answer to what is obviously, the most important question.
*hare brained
Nice try, I think you meant harebrained. When pointing out a spelling error, one should make sure they know how to spell it.

idiots like you who (once) said that global warming was a hoax (before realizing how stupid it made you sound) are the true zealots, and i share your frustration with them.

i just wish we could look at the science.
Still a scam. Hard to call people zealots, who are just trying to be left alone by a bunch of hairbrained (also correct by the way) Eco-Loons with a manufactured crisis


Real easy question to answer.

Becuase Global warming will negativly affect you for the reasons you have already stated and more.
You are right. It is a easy question to answer. The hard part is for you to understand the ramifications of it
Several hours from the coast. Not seeing it. And not seeing how a 100 year creep of rising oceans can't be dealt with by means other than taxing ourselves, sending the money to other countries and/or buying carbon credits. But, that's not the subject at hand. We still haven't seen a SHRED of this easily obtainable evidence that any of these side effects are going to be negative to more than small percentage of the global population.

Did I miss the study that proves Los Angeles can't be kept dry with engineering and a 100 year head start? This little exchange is going VERY badly for you two.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
i've asked him to cite the predictions he refers to and he has refused to for months now.

i mean, he wasn't able to read simple, scientific polling and come within 14 points of guessing the election result, but he's probably much better at dealing with climate science.
It is a good thing the UN droid have not gained the actual vote for Global Warming. It would be hot as hell. That is what that article about Pretense of Knowledge means to me.

The worst thing by far is not that there may be some warming. That is science. But the way the world now believes in it, is tyranny. It is Thought Control and Emotion Tampering of the very young minds by cynical power brokers. And in that, it is a Religion. Religion seek to control, not the natural element, but the human element.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Now it's SHOULD? If it's not 100% in your mind, wtf are we debating? Your argument relies on that as an absolute, don't go bending on that now. I would assert a slow creeping rise of the oceans over 50-100 years offers more than enough time for physical solutions that wouldn't require a "mass evacuation" and the hysteria and chaos that claim tries to bring to mind.



Apparently you reading compensation has failed you?





Nice try, I think you meant harebrained. When pointing out a spelling error, one should make sure they know how to spell it.



Still a scam. Hard to call people zealots, who are just trying to be left alone by a bunch of hairbrained (also correct by the way) Eco-Loons with a manufactured crisis




Several hours from the coast. Not seeing it. And not seeing how a 100 year creep of rising oceans can't be dealt with by means other than taxing ourselves, sending the money to other countries and/or buying carbon credits. But, that's not the subject at hand. We still haven't seen a SHRED of this easily obtainable evidence that any of these side effects are going to be negative to more than small percentage of the global population.

Did I miss the study that proves Los Angeles can't be kept dry with engineering and a 100 year head start? This little exchange is going VERY badly for you two.
Carbon credits are a stupid idea. Like most republican ideas
 
Top