Gotta love the rare conservative with tenure

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Why do you ignore the science?
Are you giving up using your Vulcan logic to explain scientifically why you oppose abortion? To recap, you say

  • a zygote is different from the mother.
  • A woman's primary purpose in life is to have babies.
So my questions are:

  • How do you draw the conclusion that a woman's primary purpose is to have babies?
  • What is it about the zygote that requires a woman to go to term?
From a scientific point of view, all objective and verifiable and all that. I'd really like to hear what your answers are. Or are you too cowardly to reply and expose your ignorance again? Don't forget what I taught you. A zygote is not the same as a fetus.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
cowarddave is intentionally being obtuse because that's all he's got. he doesn't have facts to support his idiocy.
Things we learned from @bravedave today:

  • Swagger with unjustified confidence and people will admire you:
What is really funny is that if this was a real fight the odds probably would still be in my favor.
Lololol!! :lol::lol:
  • quote history as though every thing you say is true and people will be in awe:
Again, you do not know your history. The big switch never happened. You and yours point to StromThurmond as the evidence. That's one. Democrats created a myth. Find me the masses of Dixiecrats who became Republicans. You won't be able to. The same racist democrats who voted against civil rights died racist Democrats.
  • copying and pasting somebody else's work without comment is an extremely effective way to win the crowd over:
welp, this thread got completely derail in under a page.

poor bravedave and his shitty threads. id hate for him to run into me, ya know a 2nd amendment supporter. it would be terrible.
Anyway, thanks again for the entertainment, Dave. Sleep it off and have a couple cups of black coffee tomorrow morning. You won't feel great but you'll be ready for another installment of Dave's World, as seen in all it's splendor on Rollitup.
 
Last edited:

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Progressivism is what ended slavery and is what enabled women's rights and civil rights.

Your argument to oppose that claim is,


I'd honestly love to punch you in the face repeatedly. Ya know, as a 2nd amendment supporter an all. Because ya know, that would be terrible.
I'd love to give you the chance.
So are you using the term "progressives" to cover up for the fact that you can't truthfully use the term Democrat? Kinda like climate change vs global warming.?

The Republican party was formed to abolish slavery.

I too like the 2nd amendment but the 13th, 14 and 15th are pretty great too. You know what party voted overwhelmingly for them...and which one didn't. How about the Civil Rights Act? Do you know what the reviled "southern strategy" was about?

You know George Wallace was a Democrat right? Maddox? Mahoney? Bull Conner? Who started the KKK again? Republicans started to win in the south not because the Democrat racists switched parties, but because racism became reviled and it was ok to be either white or black and be a Republican and not have to hide it. You know the KKK hated Republicans much like you do?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I'd love to give you the chance.
So are you using the term "progressives" to cover up for the fact that you can't truthfully use the term Democrat? Kinda like climate change vs global warming.?

The Republican party was formed to abolish slavery.

I too like the 2nd amendment but the 13th, 14 and 15th are pretty great too. You know what party voted overwhelmingly for them...and which one didn't. How about the Civil Rights Act? Do you know what the reviled "southern strategy" was about?

You know George Wallace was a Democrat right? Maddox? Mahoney? Bull Conner? Who started the KKK again? Republicans started to win in the south not because the Democrat racists switched parties, but because racism became reviled and it was ok to be either white or black and be a Republican and not have to hide it. You know the KKK hated Republicans much like you do?
OK Dinesh, then why did southern conservatives vote overwhelmingly democratic up until the civil rights act of 1964, then switch to republican afterwards?

You seem to be hung up on the labels 'democrat' and 'republican' when the ideologies are much more important. During Lincoln's time, republicans were progressives fighting for equal rights for blacks. The KKK developed as a response to republican progressivism. Then the civil rights movement took place, LBJ and congressional progressives passed the CRA of 1964, then conservative democrats who felt ostracized by their party switched to republican. That's why you see the south go red directly after the 1964 presidential election.

Conservatives - democrats from 1855-1964/republicans ever since - have always been opposed to equal rights. Progressives - republicans from 1855-1964/democrats ever since - have always supported equal rights

And your tacit admission that those that have supported equal rights the entire time are better is an admission that even you know you're wrong and your argument is bullshit, even though you probably won't admit it. Funny thing is, nobody needs your admission of it to know it's true
 

see4

Well-Known Member
OK Dinesh, then why did southern conservatives vote overwhelmingly democratic up until the civil rights act of 1964, then switch to republican afterwards?

You seem to be hung up on the labels 'democrat' and 'republican' when the ideologies are much more important. During Lincoln's time, republicans were progressives fighting for equal rights for blacks. The KKK developed as a response to republican progressivism. Then the civil rights movement took place, LBJ and congressional progressives passed the CRA of 1964, then conservative democrats who felt ostracized by their party switched to republican. That's why you see the south go red directly after the 1964 presidential election.

Conservatives - democrats from 1855-1964/republicans ever since - have always been opposed to equal rights. Progressives - republicans from 1855-1964/democrats ever since - have always supported equal rights

And your tacit admission that those that have supported equal rights the entire time are better is an admission that even you know you're wrong and your argument is bullshit, even though you probably won't admit it. Funny thing is, nobody needs your admission of it to know it's true
lol, Dinesh... that dude is a fucking loser. Nice one Pada.
 

bravedave

Well-Known Member
You're a fucking moron. Padawan answered your tired drivel, so I don't need to. But just know you're a fucking nitwit, who deserves, well I don't know, someone who supports the 2nd Amendment, it would be terrible.
Paddycakes answered with the same tired lies that have been fed the ignorant for years. Stay that way.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
lol, Dinesh... that dude is a fucking loser. Nice one Pada.
I actually knew him quite well in DC. He was always very businesslike in his choices of 'study'. He knew who was paying and was not terribly discriminating about taking checks. Smart guy. I hear he used to be a scholar once too.
 
Top