How do we define Secured Borders

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE


arrekin, post: 10994904, member: 157561"]I bet they have one of the highest % shares tho.

That and all those dirty, drunk, undocumented gingers.
I'm a drunk ginger. Glad my family got here legally.[/QUOTE]
You see, you CLAIM to be a drunk ginger...but just how drunk and ginger are you really?

If you've had less than 5 pints this weekend, you're not drunk enough.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
I hear the cop out from the right
"We will discuss immigration reform when our Borders are Secure"

So how do we define our borders as secure?
I'm listening
the definition of secure borders is shockingly similar to the definition of a secure house.

you dont let just any asshole walk in and take your shit do you? why should the nation be less concerned over security than you are?

secure borders means nobody gets in without approval, when that happens THEN you can talk about a "path to citizenship" or legalizing the illegals already here.

otherwise youre just opening the country to every asshole that can walk across the border, particularly those who are unwanted in their homeland (remember the mariel boat lift, when cuba emptied their prisons into florida?) mexico is currently trying to expell their mestiso population into the US so they can pursue their dream of a european nation.

we get the wretched refuse of every teeming shore, and despite what you may believe, that is NOT part of any law or the constitution.

the US can and must refuse entry to criminals, undesireables, drains on the public coffers, and other persons who are not a net benefit to the nation.

unless you think the US should become a third world country riddled with sectarian violence.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
the definition of secure borders is shockingly similar to the definition of a secure house.

you dont let just any asshole walk in and take your shit do you? why should the nation be less concerned over security than you are?

secure borders means nobody gets in without approval, when that happens THEN you can talk about a "path to citizenship" or legalizing the illegals already here.

otherwise youre just opening the country to every asshole that can walk across the border, particularly those who are unwanted in their homeland (remember the mariel boat lift, when cuba emptied their prisons into florida?) mexico is currently trying to expell their mestiso population into the US so they can pursue their dream of a european nation.

we get the wretched refuse of every teeming shore, and despite what you may believe, that is NOT part of any law or the constitution.

the US can and must refuse entry to criminals, undesireables, drains on the public coffers, and other persons who are not a net benefit to the nation.

unless you think the US should become a third world country riddled with sectarian violence.
Why were the French not given hell for kicking out the Vietnamese after violating the prime directive, but we get shamed?
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
huh?

kindly explain that one...

The French disobeyed the prime directive with their attempted fail at making Vietnam a colony. They gave a people without a written language writing using French pronunciation symbols.

The Vietnamese came by the boatloat to France to seek refugee status. But the French sent them back.

Yet when us Yanks do the same now, we're the devil.

Every nation has an immigration policy. Only America is given shit for having one too.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
The French disobeyed the prime directive with their attempted fail at making Vietnam a colony. They gave a people without a written language writing using French pronunciation symbols.

The Vietnamese came by the boatloat to France to seek refugee status. But the French sent them back.

Yet when us Yanks do the same now, we're the devil.

Every nation has an immigration policy. Only America is given shit for having one too.
ahh ok, now i got ya.

i was assuming this was recent shit.


france currently gets assloads of shit over refusing north african kebab sellers assylum status.

every time they turn away a kebab merchant at their border the muzzies throw a riot and the world press laments france's racism
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
ahh ok, now i got ya.

i was assuming this was recent shit.


france currently gets assloads of shit over refusing north african kebab sellers assylum status.

every time they turn away a kebab merchant at their border the muzzies throw a riot and the world press laments france's racism
I don't know why so many who don't worship that religion get such a thrill over it.

Sweden used to be a great place. But now it's a haven for moslems to hang out and commit without any world press about such attrocities.

There's an agenda and we're powerless to stop it.

Once wars stop, we'll have to worry about local wars with our own citizens commiting crimes but depending which new "abused" group is complaining, they get a free pass to fuck everyone and cry about how terrible people treat them.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ahh ok, now i got ya.

i was assuming this was recent shit.


france currently gets assloads of shit over refusing north african kebab sellers assylum status.

every time they turn away a kebab merchant at their border the muzzies throw a riot and the world press laments france's racism
France has so many darkies because as part of the French colonies many got right of return to France.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
France has so many darkies because as part of the French colonies many got right of return to France.
1984 was wrong. It's now 1985. But making a movie about that topic would be racist.

He also wrote, A Clockwork Orange.

ANTHONY BURGESS 1985 said:
the trade unions have become so powerful that they exert full control over society; unions exist for every imaginable occupation. Unions start strikes with little reason and a strike by one union usually turns into a general strike.

Another major theme of the novella is the rise of Islam as a major cultural and political force in Britain, due to large-scale immigration from the Middle East; London abounds with mosques and rich Arabs.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
secure borders means nobody gets in without approval, when that happens THEN you can talk about a "path to citizenship" or legalizing the illegals already here.
nah, i don't think we have to satisfy the demands of a racist shit like you before we go about fixing an issue that affects the lives of millions of children who are here through no fault of their own and know no other nation.

mexico is currently trying to expell their mestiso population into the US so they can pursue their dream of a european nation.
simply retarded, since mexican is just mestizo (spaniard + native).

what white supremacy site clued you in on this crackpot conspiracy?

we get the wretched refuse of every teeming shore, and despite what you may believe, that is NOT part of any law or the constitution.

the US can and must refuse entry to criminals, undesireables, drains on the public coffers, and other persons who are not a net benefit to the nation.

unless you think the US should become a third world country riddled with sectarian violence.
and let me guess, kkkynes.

i bet you share phillipe rushton's same views on "undesireables" being "blacks, muslims, and immigrants", right?

no need to answer, you have already answered that one in the affirmative.

but you are totally not racist, and neither is rushton.

only in your world, kynes.

i don't think we'll be satisfying your racism before we start to have an adult conversation about immigration.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
nah, i don't think we have to satisfy the demands of a racist shit like you before we go about fixing an issue that affects the lives of millions of children who are here through no fault of their own and know no other nation.



simply retarded, since mexican is just mestizo (spaniard + native).

what white supremacy site clued you in on this crackpot conspiracy?



and let me guess, kkkynes.

i bet you share phillipe rushton's same views on "undesireables" being "blacks, muslims, and immigrants", right?

no need to answer, you have already answered that one in the affirmative.

but you are totally not racist, and neither is rushton.

only in your world, kynes.

i don't think we'll be satisfying your racism before we start to have an adult conversation about immigration.
typical shitpost.

mestisos are mixed race mexicans, and they are the ones being given comic books to inform them of the tricks to sneaking across the border.

the mexican govt has a plan, to become spain, and that means getting rid of their udesireables.

pretending their eugenics plan is somehow my fault is retarded.

but then that word does describe you so well
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
mestisos are mixed race mexicans, and they are the ones being given comic books to inform them of the tricks to sneaking across the border.
i think i know what you are so dishonestly referring to as "comic books to inform them of the tricks to sneaking across the border", but would you please cite your crackpot theory to be sure?

the mexican govt has a plan, to become spain, and that means getting rid of their udesireables.
again, what white nationalist website are you concocting these conspiracy theories from?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
i think i know what you are so dishonestly referring to as "comic books to inform them of the tricks to sneaking across the border", but would you please cite your crackpot theory to be sure?



again, what white nationalist website are you concocting these conspiracy theories from?
The comic books were an effort to educate. Since so many of them were dying atteming to cross.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
The comic books were an effort to educate. Since so many of them were dying atteming to cross.
ha ha ha ha ha

how to avoid being caught by la migra, legal advice and referrals for the illegal who wants to fight deportation, how to get illegal work... very "educational"
 
Top