Nothing dumber than a flat earther

Status
Not open for further replies.
RetiredGuerilla

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
hillbill said:
I fished nights for years and watched numerous satellites pass overhead for a while after sunset. Until the global earth shaded them from the sun
Click to expand...
LIAR. How large do you say a satellite is and how far away is it? A commercial airliner is barely visible at 25,000 feet and they are way bigger than your so called satellites. That dog don't hunt. If it had blinking lights it was a plane you mental midget.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
RetiredGuerilla said:
Been waiting for years for you to use science instead of insults.
Click to expand...
And yet you avoid science like the plague, and freely fling insults at those who disagree with you.

One thing I’ve noticed about your posts is that you back none of your claims; you simply throw them out there with zero references to the literature.

Consider this: one cannot prove anything using a video. An acceptable level of reference is compliant with the academic standard: it must be printed in a peer-reviewed publication as found in university libraries around the world.

This excludes monographs. Those are the professor’s way to express opinions free from the requirement for peer review. This is why e.g. Velikovsky could use books to reach an audience for his Electric Universe “theory” which fails the first moment the scientific method is brought to bear.

If your core contention were true in any detail, you’d have already guided us to the qualifying reference ... and then no doubt have sung Neener at us for months.

But it isn’t, and you can’t.

So you resort to empty contempt and idle name-calling while you endlessly repeat what has been thoroughly debunked here and all over the Net except in those hives of conspiracy bros that have isolated themselves from any sort of reasoned review so that they may hot-box each other with the heady smoke of a shared delusion of essentially religious power.

All while bringing not a single credible reference to the table and hiding behind the troll’s ultimate redoubt: “do the research and get woke”.

Trouble is, research requires valid references, and you’ve not given us even one. Which very strongly suggests that you know you’re utterly in the wrong, and trying to hide that naked fact behind an Emperor’s wardrobe of lies and insults.
 
Last edited:
RetiredGuerilla

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
And yet you avoid science like the plague, and freely fling insults at those who disagree with you.

One thing I’ve noticed about your posts is that you back none of your claims; you simply throw them out there with zero references to the literature.

Consider this: one cannot prove anything using a video. An acceptable level of reference is compliant with the academic standard: it must be printed in a peer-reviewed publication as found in university libraries around the world.

This excludes monographs. Those are the professor’s way to express opinions free from the requirement for peer review. This is why e.g. Velikovsky could use books to reach an audience for his Electric Universe “theory” which fails the first moment the scientific method is brought to bear.

If your core contention were true in any detail, you’d have already guided us to the qualifying reference ... and then no doubt have sung Neener at us for months.

But it isn’t, and you can’t.

So you resort to empty contempt and idle name-calling while you endlessly repeat what has been thoroughly debunked here and all over the Net except in those hives of conspiracy bros that have isolated themselves from any sort of reasoned review so that they may hot-box each other with the heady smoke of a shared delusion of essentially religious power.

All while bringing not a single credible reference to the table and hiding behind the troll’s ultimate redoubt: “do the research and get woke”.

Trouble is, research requires valid references, and you’ve not given us even one. Which very strongly suggests that you know you’re utterly in the wrong, and trying to hide that naked fact behind an Emperor’s wardrobe of lies and insults.
Click to expand...
Don't make me pull up that poorly faked NASA video again. :cuss: Does math lie? Does the natural physics of water lie? Facts and reason all through this thread. If I am such a waste of your time with falsehoods why have you kept coming back the last two years? Why have all of you? It's because you are intrigued with the information and facts and reasoning I provide. Hell, i bet the majority of you just now learned of the submarine cables on the ocean floor from today's lesson.
 
Last edited:
Wattzzup

Wattzzup

Well-Known Member
RetiredGuerilla said:
Don't make me pull up that poorly faked NASA video again. :cuss: Does math lie? Does the natural physics of water lie? Facts and reason all through this thread. If I am such a waste of your time with falsehoods why have you kept coming back the last two years? Why have all of you? It's because you are intrigued with the information and facts and reasoning I provide. Hell, i bet the majority of you just now learned of the submarine cables on the ocean floor from today's lesson.
Click to expand...
what a clown same rhetoric every post. Nothing new
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
RetiredGuerilla said:
Don't make me pull up that poorly faked NASA video again. Does math lie? Does the natural physics of water lie?
Click to expand...
Your videos lie. Your books lie. Your alleged map lies. Your “research” lies. You lie, constantly and badly.

None of this has anything to do with either math or physics. Another lie, this one by attempting to steal science by association.

Still no viable reference from you; you’re consistent in your dishonesty.

If you’re serious about the NASA calumny you allege, where is a peer-reviewed article reference from, say, Russia or China, our spacefaring rivals?

The song remains the same:

 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
RetiredGuerilla said:
Don't make me pull up that poorly faked NASA video again. :cuss: Does math lie? Does the natural physics of water lie? Facts and reason all through this thread. If I am such a waste of your time with falsehoods why have you kept coming back the last two years? Why have all of you? It's because you are intrigued with the information and facts and reasoning I provide. Hell, i bet the majority of you just now learned of the submarine cables on the ocean floor from today's lesson.
Click to expand...
I missed the editation.

Another lie: not any of the facts or reason we’re presented in your posts.
An example of your incessant crowing “I brought facts and all y’all are just too dumb to see them!” Show a single post of yours that contradicts this systematic dishonesty.
I predict that instead of fact, you’ll just continue with straw-man lies like the quoted.

You’re fascinating the way a hangnail is. It’s hard to turn away from such a perfect slow-mo trainwreck of complete and undiluted hogwash. Honey Boo Boo had robust ratings because so many love a complete shitshow. You deliver weapons-grade shit with every typed word.
 
RetiredGuerilla

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
And yet you avoid science like the plague, and freely fling insults at those who disagree with you.

One thing I’ve noticed about your posts is that you back none of your claims; you simply throw them out there with zero references to the literature.

Consider this: one cannot prove anything using a video. An acceptable level of reference is compliant with the academic standard: it must be printed in a peer-reviewed publication as found in university libraries around the world.

This excludes monographs. Those are the professor’s way to express opinions free from the requirement for peer review. This is why e.g. Velikovsky could use books to reach an audience for his Electric Universe “theory” which fails the first moment the scientific method is brought to bear.

If your core contention were true in any detail, you’d have already guided us to the qualifying reference ... and then no doubt have sung Neener at us for months.

But it isn’t, and you can’t.

So you resort to empty contempt and idle name-calling while you endlessly repeat what has been thoroughly debunked here and all over the Net except in those hives of conspiracy bros that have isolated themselves from any sort of reasoned review so that they may hot-box each other with the heady smoke of a shared delusion of essentially religious power.

All while bringing not a single credible reference to the table and hiding behind the troll’s ultimate redoubt: “do the research and get woke”.

Trouble is, research requires valid references, and you’ve not given us even one. Which very strongly suggests that you know you’re utterly in the wrong, and trying to hide that naked fact behind an Emperor’s wardrobe of lies and insults.
Click to expand...
See page 181 post # 3619, See page 186 post# 3705 proceed to 9:56 of video, See page 184 post #3663 a lot of evidence vs. NASA there.
 
Rrog

Rrog

Well-Known Member
Same old bullshit refuted dozens of times in this thread alone. He points to bullshit as fact. It’s soooo old now
 
SPLFreak808

SPLFreak808

Well-Known Member
RetiredGuerilla said:
You still trust NASA so it makes you a lot of things. Please choose one of the following below.
1. Globetard
2. Kool-aid drinker
3. Indoctrinated
4. Brain washed
5. Sheep
6. Fluoridated Zombie
7. Ignoramus
Click to expand...
Why pretend like your the only one conscious of what you eat/drink? Where does this shit even come from lol.. Its just low-key name calling

You might want to add back some minerals to that rainwater you've been collecting, I'll put $100 that most of us here are in better physical/mental shape than you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top