Interesting.. we happen to have a young friend who's a paleoclimatologist. Both of you might be interested to hear his take on the situation.
MM, you do know, don't you, that a U.K. court found that Gore's "documentary" had something like nine instances of scientifically invalid, non-factual "information" that was being passed off as though factually correct, yes? If the message needs to be spun, then maybe there's something wrong with the message.. or maybe with the messenger. Coming from someone such as Al is just disingenuous, to put it mildly.