Poll for ALL Presidential candidates 2012

These people on this site are on crack if you're voting for obama, if you're on this site and like pot then he would be your last choice, i am officially declaring shinanigans on this poll.
No body likes a liar.

I don't think everybody base their vote on the next POTUS on pot..I in no way do...more important things in life then just pot..

sync0s said:

Why choose the lesser of two evils? If it were Stalin vs Hitler, I wouldn't vote for either one. How about you?

Click to expand...

If it was hitler, stalin or obaama, I would have to go with one of the first two

This guy is fucking killing me

How are you doin at the moment?

so according to you Obama is worst then Hitler...and people wonder why we can't take Obama haters serious...Love to hear other peoples point of view but stupid comments like that makes me say why bother..Let me spend the day away from this shit

Well, the great thing about being an Obama hater/disliker, is that regardless of the reason why someone hates/dislikes him, it doesn't rely on you or any of the ilk like you to take them serious. That is one of the most laughable comments I've seen on here. Do you think we seek your approval? Get over yourself, we view you as ignorant, subversive, suicidal lemmings who would sink the whole country, rather than have people take responsibility for their lot in life.

MuyLocoNC said:

Well, the great thing about being an Obama hater/disliker, is that regardless of the reason why someone hates/dislikes him, it doesn't rely on you or any of the ilk like you to take them serious. That is one of the most laughable comments I've seen on here. Do you think we seek your approval? Get over yourself, we view you as ignorant, subversive, suicidal lemmings who would sink the whole country, rather than have people take responsibility for their lot in life.

Click to expand...

No gonorrhea breath there is a big difference between an Obama hater and someone who dislike him..I guess when Glen Back told you to hate you ate it up...Idiots who go around saying Obama is Hitler or Fascists lets me know how dumb and stupid they are...Haters...Now someone who dislikes him can explain that its his policy and even can put up a decent argument...You are a hater who just doesn't want the man in office for your own personal hang ups...How the fuck can you vote for Ron Paul but then turn around and say you would vote for a Cheny/Rove ticket..boy you all over the map...contradicting your own believes if your sorry azz have any..Is it not time for you to start that Teabagger rally in NC

Obama made the list?!?!?! sheeit, he's a one termer

londonfog said:

No gonorrhea breath there is a big difference between an Obama hater and someone who dislike him..I guess when Glen Back told you to hate you ate it up...Idiots who go around saying Obama is Hitler or Fascists lets me know how dumb and stupid they are...Haters...Now someone who dislikes him can explain that its his policy and even can put up a decent argument...You are a hater who just doesn't want the man in office for your own personal hang ups...How the fuck can you vote for Ron Paul but then turn around and say you would vote for a Cheny/Rove ticket..boy you all over the map...contradicting your own believes if your sorry azz have any..Is it not time for you to start that Teabagger rally in NC

Click to expand...

Ok fucknut, you apparently missed the entire point of my post...as usual. I never claimed there wasn't a difference between them, show me that statement...idiot. I put them together because it doesn't matter which one someone is, they don't need your approval in EITHER CASE...dumbfuck. OOOOh, a hater lets you know how dumb they are...good for you...they don't give a shit what you know and don't know...THAT WAS THE POINT...douchebag. If your going to address my post, address the fact we don't care what you think...but then your entire world crashes if what YOU care about isn't considered, doesn't it.

And there is NO contradiction in who I'm voting for, as I stated CLEARLY, I'm voting for whoever is running against Obama...period. I said I would support Paul up to the point he isn't nominated. I also stated I think the ticket will be Perry/Rubio, which it will, and then I will support them over Obama. My point about Cheny/Rove was even they are more favorable than the jackass currently residing in the white house. Not all over the map at all...completely consistent. You just don't like the idea that I won't take votes away from the Repubs by voting for a lame duck candidate. Sorry pal, you guys are sunk.

MuyLocoNC said:

Ok fucknut, you apparently missed the entire point of my post...as usual. I never claimed there wasn't a difference between them, show me that statement...idiot. I put them together because it doesn't matter which one someone is, they don't need your approval in EITHER CASE...dumbfuck. OOOOh, a hater lets you know how dumb they are...good for you...they don't give a shit what you know and don't know...THAT WAS THE POINT...douchebag. If your going to address my post, address the fact we don't care what you think...but then your entire world crashes if what YOU care about isn't considered, doesn't it.

And there is NO contradiction in who I'm voting for, as I stated CLEARLY, I'm voting for whoever is running against Obama...period. I said I would support Paul up to the point he isn't nominated. I also stated I think the ticket will be Perry/Rubio, which it will, and then I will support them over Obama. My point about Cheny/Rove was even they are more favorable than the jackass currently residing in the white house. Not all over the map at all...completely consistent. You just don't like the idea that I won't take votes away from the Repubs by voting for a lame duck candidate. Sorry pal, you guys are sunk.

Click to expand...

If I were forced to choose between Obama and Cheney, It would be Obama. Cheney was part of the worst and most corrupt presidency in the history of the US. You are just anti-democrat, obviously.

sync0s said:

If I were forced to choose between Obama and Cheney, It would be Obama. Cheney was part of the worst and most corrupt presidency in the history of the US. You are just anti-democrat, obviously.

Click to expand...

Ya think?

.....

tryingtogrow89 said:

How the hell is Soetoro even getting so many votes?

Click to expand...

tryingtogrow89 said:

If ron paul does not win, then i know 100% these elections aren't real and are rigged, which should cause everyone to revolt right then and there because it would be so blatant.

Click to expand...

tryingtogrow89 said:

Luckily we wont have trolls recreating accounts (people) duplicates, then putting more than one vote for soetoro, what a joke.

Click to expand...

tryingtogrow89 said:

These people on this site are on crack if you're voting for obama, if you're on this site and like pot then he would be your last choice, i am officially declaring shinanigans on this poll.
No body likes a liar.

Click to expand...

MuyLocoNC said:

Ya think?

.....

Click to expand...

Baseless partisanship is worse for the country than any single politician; Vote for the PERSON not the party IMO... It really bugs me that the number one quality Republicans are looking for in a candidate is that they "can beat Obama"... Not that they hold a familiar set of values, not that you geniunely support a specific candidate - but because he can beat Obama? What if you blindly vote someone in who is actually WORSE? What then? If you like Paul cool, I can respect that. But would you seriously vote people like Bachmann or Palin in just because you think they could beat Obama - despite thier obvious lack of intelligence? It seems too many Republicans would... That kind of partisanship is bad for the nation as a whole IMO.

And to be fair, I'm sure there are Democrats who vote Democrat just because they dont want a Republican in office... But that's just as bad, and for the same reasons.

mame said:

Baseless partisanship is worse for the country than any single politician; Vote for the PERSON not the party IMO... It really bugs me that the number one quality Republicans are looking for in a candidate is that they "can beat Obama"... Not that they hold a familiar set of values, not that you geniunely support a specific candidate - but because he can beat Obama? What if you blindly vote someone in who is actually WORSE? What then? If you like Paul cool, I can respect that. But would you seriously vote people like Bachmann or Palin in just because you think they could beat Obama - despite thier obvious lack of intelligence? It seems too many Republicans would... That kind of partisanship is bad for the nation as a whole IMO.

And to be fair, I'm sure there are Democrats who vote Democrat just because they dont want a Republican in office... But that's just as bad, and for the same reasons.

Click to expand...

+Rep, I think you hit the nail right on the head.



Gotta spread it around.

I know Ted Nugent got one of the "not on the list" votes... who got the other two? Mao and Che?

mame said:

Baseless partisanship is worse for the country than any single politician; Vote for the PERSON not the party IMO... It really bugs me that the number one quality Republicans are looking for in a candidate is that they "can beat Obama"... Not that they hold a familiar set of values, not that you geniunely support a specific candidate - but because he can beat Obama? What if you blindly vote someone in who is actually WORSE? What then? If you like Paul cool, I can respect that. But would you seriously vote people like Bachmann or Palin in just because you think they could beat Obama - despite thier obvious lack of intelligence? It seems too many Republicans would... That kind of partisanship is bad for the nation as a whole IMO.

And to be fair, I'm sure there are Democrats who vote Democrat just because they dont want a Republican in office... But that's just as bad, and for the same reasons.

Click to expand...

First off, I'm sure it does "bug you" because it is that commitment that will make sure Obama loses. That's worked against Republicans many times before...like I said, not this time pal. I'm glad it "bugs you" because that CLEARLY shows it is the correct action.

Secondly, I can't think of any conservative I would want in office less than Obama. Yup, not one. With as much conviction as you would have voted against GW Bush if there were such a thing as a third term, I'm voting against Obama. Don't lie, you know you would have voted for any cold duck with a D next to his name, so don't try to bullshit me, I FUCKING KNOW you would. I have every bit as much contempt for and just as little respect for Obama as you have for Bush. Sorry that doesn't register with you, but I couldn't care less that it doesn't

Are there candidates I would prefer, sure. But I think your guy is as dangerous to this country as any threat we face. Couldn't give a flying fuck if you can process that or not, it's reality. You could no more change my mind on that subject, than you could get me to believe in God. I want to unwind the last 80 years of entitlements and social engineering, it might take a bit of time, but I sure would like to see the ball start rolling in that direction. Go ahead, say it's cause he's black, if you knew me, you'd know how ridiculous that is, but it changes nothing anyways. We OBVIOUSLY view the world through different eyes, and I think your positions are just as outlandish as you see mine. I don't care if the MSM has a bunch of libs that parrot your points, it gives your positions absolutely no more credibility...at all.

Ron Paul Continues To Lead

UncleBuck said:

Click to expand...

Currently 43% for Obama on a MJ website, with a large percentage of it's users from California. Lol, if you guys ain't crying by now, you should be. Even if 5% write in a third candidate, it's still a LANDSLIDE for the Republicans. Not looking good for your guy at all.

MuyLocoNC said:

Currently 43% for Obama on a MJ website, with a large percentage of it's users from California. Lol, if you guys ain't crying by now, you should be. Even if 5% write in a third candidate, it's still a LANDSLIDE for the Republicans. Not looking good for your guy at all.

Click to expand...

Maybe this has something to do with his lies and lack of consistancy on MMJ

MuyLocoNC said:

Currently 43% for Obama on a MJ website, with a large percentage of it's users from California. Lol, if you guys ain't crying by now, you should be. Even if 5% write in a third candidate, it's still a LANDSLIDE for the Republicans. Not looking good for your guy at all.

Click to expand...

Uhm, I really doubt it'll be a landslide for Republicans... a look at the 1012 electoral map (and here is some RIU discussion on the topic) suggests it'll be fairly tough for Republicans despite the momentum they gained in the 2010 midterms.

I do hate soetoro and i guess its mainly because of the part that he is a liar and doesnt like america. hmmm