POST DEBATE - Main Stream Media - RON PAUL WON AND WILL WIN - SUCK IT!
- Thread starter deprave
- Start date
absolutely no way Ron Paul will win the Presidential election in 2012. period.
deprave
New Member
Wrong, your a hater. Period.
Ron Paul won the debate last night, main stream media can't help but agree.
[video=youtube;pNBtxdl_1UQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNBtxdl_1UQ[/video]
deprave
New Member
Its obvious you are "not even signing in more than a handful of times a week anymore" if you believe the former. I only make a Ron Paul thread on average once every 3 weeks.
laughingduck
Well-Known Member
I think a huge portion of the public would vote for him if they got to hear him speak beyond the sound bites. The establishment of both parties do not want Ron Paul heard (thats the one thing they can agree on, LOL).
deprave
New Member
Link? I only see one other one on the front page that I made, 12/03
[h=3]
[h=3]
[h=3]Drugs and God: How Political Grandpa Ron Paul attracts nerds[/h] Started by deprave‎, 12-06-2011 06:23 AM
this politics forum was the shit back in the day.... it's been ruined by partisanship.... just like every other aspect of american life....
second place is the first ____________.
Purplestickeypunch
Active Member
We let our haters be our motivators. Feel free to post / start a thread showing your support for your candidate.
RON PAUL 2012
RON PAUL 2012
Ron paul has some great Ideas. But he also has some bad Ideas as Well which makes him Unacceptable to all partys including independants. Ron Paul does well when you hear the few non radical ideas he has. And falls flat when advocating for the majority of his other ideas which are misguided or unpalatable. I am in another thread. the return to the Gold standard is one of those bad ideas he advocates for. Ron Paul does have the most fervent base though.
They look to him as a Messiah Figure almost
They look to him as a Messiah Figure almost
Purplestickeypunch
Active Member
Oh, one more thing. He is the ONLY candidate who will legalize marijuana in the US. This is a MARIJUANA forum and frankly should be filled with his supporters. Thanks for keeping the thread at the top.
that is a fucking lie.
the power to regulate drugs is, by law, not invested in the duties of the President. it is, by law, a duty EXCLUSIVELY invested in two other Executive Branch offices, the DEA and FDA. by law, the president cannot unilaterally legalize drugs. by law, congress cannot pass laws which legalize/illegalize substances. that responsibility was passed on to the executive branch of the Federal Government by a guy named Richard Nixon.
Obama probably wants to stop the war on Pot. Kind of has his hands tied though. people are harassing him for letting the DEA raid Dispensarys. but you have to ask WHy didnt the DEA raid all the Dispensarys and only some?
Seems to me the Logical reason is The raided Dispensarys were actually Drug dealers operating under Cover of Law in California.
Seems to me the Logical reason is The raided Dispensarys were actually Drug dealers operating under Cover of Law in California.
the dispensaries raided are chosen by crime rates around the area. if a dispensary is located in a neighborhood where 4 people got killed this year, yeah, it's probably gonna get shut down...
if there's a lot of break-ins, car jackings etc. in the area, the DEA just uses those statistics a supporting their claim that marijuana is to blame for crime, and shuts it down...
that's what i think anyways.... cops have a way of distorting statistics n shit for their own gain so IDK...
if there's a lot of break-ins, car jackings etc. in the area, the DEA just uses those statistics a supporting their claim that marijuana is to blame for crime, and shuts it down...
that's what i think anyways.... cops have a way of distorting statistics n shit for their own gain so IDK...
laughingduck
Well-Known Member
So your saying a president made the DEA by executive order, and another president could not abolish it with another order?
Similar threads
