InCognition
Active Member
What is my point? Your comparing a supposed KKK affiliation with Ron Paul and demonizing it, inferring that there is a degree of racism associated with Ron Paul for any form of affiliation with such a group. Because you're inferring some level of racism, I told you that Martin Luther King Jr, was not a racist in any form but may of had equivalent racist affiliations. Should Martin Luther King Jr have been demonized for such affiliations? No. He should have been praised for his good intention and character.
Point in case, you're very short sighted. You're carrying a personal distaste against another human being for having an affiliation with another group of human beings, of which their mentalities you don't agree with. He's not appeasing anyone, he's accepting support from fellow human beings for HIS cause, not theirs.
You have it confused. The letters are vague in the sense that it's very unclear as to who wrote them and or as to who actually gave permission for it to be written. They are perfectly clear in what they say, that's not the argument. If you want to believe the skewed media especially that of the internet, that is your right, it doesn't mean it's truth.
So when I say "a person's past doesn't dictate their future" that is an admittance of a racist? You told me to "read before you tell me what I'm saying". Now how come you're telling me what I'm saying? How about you practice what you preach?
Now, that's a hypocrite if I've ever seen one. You tried at a failed attempt to make me look hypocritical, but instead it just backfired on you. Too funny.
And lastly, Ron Paul does not represent the Klan. If you truly believe he represents them, you got those looney tunes playing. An affiliation is not representation, unless one is ignorant enough to believe they are one in the same.
.
