...They didn't go behind the scenes and say "we hate americans....how can we slander americans and laugh about it later?". They saw a picture. They thought it was funny, and it pertained to their business. They thought someone would go on an internet forum and post the picture with links to their business website. They thought maybe it would be viral and would grow multiple pages per hour. And maybe just by talking about how much you hate them, you are actually advertising FOR them. If you don't like what someone else is doing, shut up and ignore it. There's nothing more American than THAT. Of course you have the right to complain and cry about it. And I reserve the right to call you can idiot for doing so.
It was meant for you to look at it....laugh a little, then move on with your day. Their intentions weren't anti-American and 20-25 of their thousands of customers taking offense to it isn't going to make them take it down. Just because you complained and they don't care doesn't mean they hate America. It means they don't care about your complaints. If the majority of their American customers we're offended, they would take it down and apologize. The majority of their customers don't give a fuck because they didn't mean anything by it.
By all means, boycott their business. But boycott the tons of tv shows and movies that profit from disasters. Hell, a lot of them even profit from making jokes ABOUT disasters. We watch. We laugh. We don't care. Laughing at it is almost more American than taking offense from it, but then we get into semantics. And I'm not arguing semantics on this website. We will be here for years.
You make some good points.
I thought the same thing initially. Most of the rest of the world does not see 9/11 as a cataclysmic tragedy the way the Americans do. They are somewhat bemused by what they see as an American obsession and total overreaction to the attack on the Twin Towers. IMO they have a point. But whether you agree or disagree, this is their viewpoint and it's easy to see how a European company would not realize the strength of the feeling it might provoke in American customers.
But if what they intended was to make a lighthearted joke about all the MJ smoke in NY city, then to my thinking, they would back off as soon as they realized it was not going down as a joke and some of their customers were offended by it. The fact that they responded to KuLong's message with a blunt 'No' suggests that there is more to their choice of the photo than just using it as a prop for a joke. I see it as deliberately provocative and confrontational.
I didn't see the movie with Cage that you referred to. I avoid most of the 'documentaries' and movies on this subject. I find them to be insufferable, sensationlist clap trap and I have no patience for all the conspiracy innuendo that usually goes with into these pieces. But that's neither here nor there. If I
were to watch them I might well find them offensive but I would see no point in writing a letter of protest. People who make movies and TV shows review every element in their show with excruciating care and if they showed this picture it would mean they knew exactly what they were doing and there is no point in trying to dissuade them. In the case of Seedsman, there is the real possibility that they didn't intend the reaction they provoked.
Another consideration is that such shows, unfortunately, fall under the umbrella of 'Art'. In that arena it is understood that people have a license to explore ideas even if they are offensive or disturbing. No matter how much you disagree with a show's point of view, you don't question its basic right to express that opinion. In large part, that's what art is about.
Business is different. I expect business transactions to be neutral or even sterile with regard to politics , religion or anything whatsoever that is not immediately related to the transaction itself. I consider it an imposition and a plain abuse of the relationship if a business tries to inject this kind of content into what should be a neutral commercial transaction. I just want to buy a pair of socks without having to explain why I don't accept Jesus as my Personal Savior (yeah I had that experience)