hey! hey! hey!..i'm a jersey girl born-n-bred..but the only orange glow i have is in flower
Last edited:
So New Jersey Allows Adult Incest?
- Thread starter TBoneJack
- Start date
BigEasy1
Well-Known Member
You're a girl? I didn't know that.hey! hey! hey!..i'm a jersey girl born-n-bred..the only orange glow i have is in flower
TV shows like Jersey Shore give your state a bad name. Oh, and all those old, crusty, dried up looking bastards that move to south Florida don't help either.
i know and they aren't even from NJ.You're a girl? I didn't know that.
TV shows like Jersey Shore give your state a bad name. Oh, and all those old, crusty, dried up looking bastards that move to south Florida don't help either.
Saulamus
Active Member
Additional proof to that hypothesis is that they keep re-electing his ass.
that very well could be.
look at UK..their monarchy?
diana was cousin to charles, even..just recent they've been branching out for new genetics..and not a moment too soon
it's not in most states.
remember the old days? blood test? before getting maarried? that was to make sure you weren't related.
TBoneJack
Well-Known Member
Wow, I didn't realize they could tell relations via blood test back when I got married. I do remember the blood test.
Saulamus
Active Member
Heinlein tackles this subject in many of his books, yes they're fiction, but much of it is based in real science. In his version of the future, genetics are used to determine if a couple are acceptable candidates for proliferation. While complete strangers might be horribly incompatible to safely have children, mother and son or father and daughter might have the proper genetics to improve the species.
However, we still lack the capability to do this accurately. The technology is still too young and we're still just guessing on several levels. I see such a thing as obtainable, but a slippery slope to tread, and scary in the wrong hands, as it is with many promising technologies. They always seem to be double-edged swords.
However, we still lack the capability to do this accurately. The technology is still too young and we're still just guessing on several levels. I see such a thing as obtainable, but a slippery slope to tread, and scary in the wrong hands, as it is with many promising technologies. They always seem to be double-edged swords.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
The blood test was not to test for relatedness. It is only in the age of genome sequencing (i.e. now days) that one can tell relatedness with DNA.
why even bother with a post?
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/marriage-requirements-licenses-ceremonies-faq-29142-5.html
no time?: About 867,000 results
(0.53 seconds)
you are as lazy as nlzxls.
FTW
even though we didn't have dna back then there were still markers distinguishable genetically in order to determine.are you in medical field?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
This is why I didn't bother googling your absurd claim. I knew that the old-school blood tests had nothing to do with familial identification. Being condescending and wrong is an embarrassment. Try to stop doing that.why even bother with a post?
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/marriage-requirements-licenses-ceremonies-faq-29142-5.html
no time?: About 867,000 results
(0.53 seconds)
you are as lazy as nlzxls.
From your link:
Premarital blood tests check both partners for venereal disease or rubella (measles). The tests may also disclose the presence of genetic disorders such as sickle-cell anemia or Tay-Sachs disease. You will not be tested for HIV, but in some states, the person who tests you will provide you with information about HIV and AIDS. In most states, blood tests can be waived for people over 50 and for other reasons, including pregnancy or sterility.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
You keep doing this, usually while putting someone down. Did you read your own link?why even bother with a post?
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/marriage-requirements-licenses-ceremonies-faq-29142-5.html
no time?: About 867,000 results
(0.53 seconds)
you are as lazy as nlzxls.
It was not to see if people were related.
pot calling the kettle black; that's a pretty sexist line.
Saulamus
Active Member
By proxy, my wife is a medical lab tech (Microbiologist / push-button chemist). She is the one that gets to analyze any samples you might have to submit. She says she hates it when I remind her that she's actually doing chemistry all day/every day. I'm a chemist. We're both incurably curious though and through necessity have had to learn a fair amount about one another's professions.