The naked chick avatars

what do you think of sexual avatars?

  • clean it up.

    Votes: 100 44.6%
  • i degrade women and like it.

    Votes: 124 55.4%

  • Total voters
    224

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
I'm with Kaya on this. Not a prude, just not here for that. Oh yea, and I vote FDD's as best avatar ever. lol

i had to vote clean it up because some avatars are a little over the top. It doesnt bother me but seems a bit telling of the person who is using the pic
 

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
Okay, now I'm high and I'm thinking, wouldn't it be great if viewing peoples' avatars was optional? Then you could opt in or out....
 

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
Or. ... you could authorize avatars from certain members you liked, or knew so it wouldn't be all or nothing. . . .cos it would be a bummer not to see some peoples'. . . .
 

email468

Well-Known Member
"Invisible Avatar Mode" heheh. It's there, it's nasty, you just can't see it!
good idea and it can be done - but i doubt it is trivial to set something like this up. most likely would require customizing the code which introduces the possibility of security and other problems (any code changes can have great unforeseen negative repercussions). i would guess RIU would just create guidelines and ban users who don't follow them. it would be a lot easier at least as far as website maintenance is concerned.

... my two cents...
 

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
good idea and it can be done - but i doubt it is trivial to set something like this up. most likely would require customizing the code which introduces the possibility of security and other problems (any code changes can have great unforeseen negative repercussions). i would guess RIU would just create guidelines and ban users who don't follow them. it would be a lot easier at least as far as website maintenance is concerned.

... my two cents...

But then you get into judgement calls about guidelines and who needs that? I don't know much about web page design, but I look at a lot of em. There's also a way to only display things when you mouseover them. . . .

I'm out of change now. . .lol
 

email468

Well-Known Member
But then you get into judgement calls about guidelines and who needs that? I don't know much about web page design, but I look at a lot of em. There's also a way to only display things when you mouseover them. . . .

I'm out of change now. . .lol
personally i don't care what people use as avatars but the guidelines could be very clear-cut. as in: no genitalia. no intercourse or implied intercourse, etc.. infractions would be one or two warnings and then banning (or whatever RIU/mods decide). No arguments, the mods would decide and if we don't like it, tough.

I do know a little something about web design and believe the ability to "turn off" avatar displays would require more than mouseover events on a page which is why i said what i did. But i could be wrong - i often am. :joint:
 

moon47usaco

Well-Known Member
My 2 cents...

Porn... No... I agree with FDD i can go to any numerous porn sites to see triple penetration... I REally do not need it in my face while i am trying to read a post about GROWING CANNABIS... =O

Sexy... Yes... =]

I am all for the avatars that show skin or sexiness in its glory without having to make it swanky... =P

I love tahoe and his revolving sexy avatars... =]

Even some of the cannaporn are ok as long as its soft... I dont need to see the bong being held by that nice girl next door but some of them are funny and tasteful...

Have some class... No hitting below the belt, so to speak... =P
 

nowstopwhining

Too many brownies
My 2 cents...

Porn... No... I agree with FDD i can go to any numerous porn sites to see triple penetration... I REally do not need it in my face while i am trying to read a post about GROWING CANNABIS... =O

Sexy... Yes... =]

I am all for the avatars that show skin or sexiness in its glory without having to make it swanky... =P

I love tahoe and his revolving sexy avatars... =]

Even some of the cannaporn are ok as long as its soft... I dont need to see the bong being held by that nice girl next door but some of them are funny and tasteful...

Have some class... No hitting below the belt, so to speak... =P
exxxxxxaaaaccctttlllyyy

You hit the nail on the head. I think everyone can agree with this. :peace::blsmoke:
 

o2hustla

New Member
My 2 cents...

Porn... No... I agree with FDD i can go to any numerous porn sites to see triple penetration... I REally do not need it in my face while i am trying to read a post about GROWING CANNABIS... =O

Sexy... Yes... =]

I am all for the avatars that show skin or sexiness in its glory without having to make it swanky... =P

I love tahoe and his revolving sexy avatars... =]

Even some of the cannaporn are ok as long as its soft... I dont need to see the bong being held by that nice girl next door but some of them are funny and tasteful...

Have some class... No hitting below the belt, so to speak... =P

hi all, thats the way it should be, well said.

hustla
 

CALIGROWN

Well-Known Member
Yea I think most of us are on the same page on this topic...now maybe us mods should see if there is something we should do to maybe get a new policy started on avatars/images on the site...
 

ScarletteSky

Well-Known Member
The results of this poll concern me. It makes me feel like there aren't any decent men left in this world. As for the avatars there is difference between sexy and slutty; classy and trashy.


women (and men) are beautiful naked, but keep the trash and slutty garbage out of here please. Let's bring back the meaning of "taste".
 
Top