There is no pipeline, schools ARE Prisons

Hhmmm. Can I ask what part of the country you're from? I've never met somebody who speaks like that

"From" is relative. I am currently in Arizona. But mostly grew up in New England states.

Geographical location has less to do with it, more so how I was brought up. My family is mostly lawyers, business owners and executives.
 
Fuck Yeah! And if I don't want to pay for garbage removal, I should be able to pile it up in my front yard like they do in Somalia.
The hypothetical is in a remote area. Remote areas with small populations. Burning garbage would be what a civilized hard working individual would do.

I have a private company pickup my trash. The local government awarded fictional territory rights to the company with the lowest bid, and highest level of service. It was a few bucks cheaper when it was just wide open free market competition and no fictional territory rights assigned by government. You always try to troll people with Somalia, but have no grasp on how hard people have worked to offer something to society as a way to voluntarily interact with one another in a peaceful, civilized way.
 
The hypothetical is in a remote area. Remote areas with small populations. Burning garbage would be what a civilized hard working individual would do.

I have a private company pickup my trash. The local government awarded fictional territory rights to the company with the lowest bid, and highest level of service. It was a few bucks cheaper when it was just wide open free market competition and no fictional territory rights assigned by government. You always try to troll people with Somalia, but have no grasp on how hard people have worked to offer something to society as a way to voluntarily interact with one another in a peaceful, civilized way.
Your fictional example about a remote area applies to how many people on this board? The example you claim as your own applies to about the same number. Somalia is the type of country where your kind of "solutions" apply to the many. Using Somalia as an example of the negative effects of the the so-called libertarian ideal is exactly correct. Too bad you don't like it.
 
I own some land outside of city and town limits, there are no utilities on the land and there is no "paved" road leading up to that land. I do not pay taxes on said land. Well, very very little. Which I then write off the following year.

If the land I own is within town or city limits, and utilities are on, around, or under my land, I justifiably need to pay taxes on that land. You are part of a community, if you wish to not participate in said community, you are more than welcome to purchase land nowhere near a community and avoid taxation.

Your false equivalency and your pedantic approach to the nonsense you espouse is humorous. Your thick skull is clearly too cumbersome for your tiny brain, even the simplest of concepts is very hard for you to grasp. But nice try.

If you pay taxes on land and you as an individual did not make a consensual choice absent any duress to do so and then claim the tax is justified AND that YOU really own the land...does that mean you are exposing your cognitive dissonance? Yes, why yes it does.
 
Dumbest thread I've ever read
Who cares what a racist pedophile thinks about school.

I'm not either, but you are on record as proposing laws which PROHIBIT people from engaging in cannabis trade, Prohibitionist.


Can you explain to me if government schools are so good why they must use threats of home seizure to fund them?

I thought teaching children that using threats and bully tactics was a bad thing?
 
Its an interesting idea you put forth regarding the grocery store. I think it was already tried and didn't work out very well. Anarcho Capitalism is just another idealistic dogma that ignores human behavior as did Leninist Communism. Only in your case, you'd let the pedophiles and racists have free rein. No wonder you have such fear of rapists. Under your dogma, you'd have to take the asshole on by yourself. I have a system of laws and enforcement at my disposal.

I'm a part of a community. Some of our needs are met via free trade and others are not like roads and schools. I have a vote on those items. I can move to another area of country if I like. I'm doing quite well and can choose where I live. As in any community, there is give and take. I do both.

Its too late for you. You have already frittered away your life and are facing a bleak future as an old man living in poverty. Too bad for you. You are too poor to move and besides, nobody wants you. Not even communities that best fit your dogma, like Somalia and Afghanistan.


Your answer is weak and not very well thought out. It relies on rationalizations and insults. I'm sorry you think it's okay to use force to make people do things that please you, but they'd prefer not to do. That sure sounds an awful lot like a rapist tactic policy you are advocating. I'm disappointed in your inability to rise above that.
 
Fuck Yeah! And if I don't want to pay for garbage removal, I should be able to pile it up in my front yard like they do in Somalia.

You could try composting, creative recycling and reducing your waste stream by not buying a bunch of crap.

Also, if a person is forced to buy a "service" from one party only (whether they use it or not) and other people are prevented from engaging in providing that same service do you think that is or is not the most efficient and ethical mode?
 
You could try composting, creative recycling and reducing your waste stream by not buying a bunch of crap.

Also, if a person is forced to buy a "service" from one party only (whether they use it or not) and other people are prevented from engaging in providing that same service do you think that is or is not the most efficient and ethical mode?
If a 13 year old child consents to have sex with you (you Rob Roy) should that be legal?
 
Last edited:
I'm not either, but you are on record as proposing laws which PROHIBIT people from engaging in cannabis trade, Prohibitionist.


Can you explain to me if government schools are so good why they must use threats of home seizure to fund them?

I thought teaching children that using threats and bully tactics was a bad thing?
In states where no possession is legal my idea would be a relief
You on the other hand condone sex with children and promote racism
 
I'm not either, but you are on record as proposing laws which PROHIBIT people from engaging in cannabis trade, Prohibitionist.


Can you explain to me if government schools are so good why they must use threats of home seizure to fund them?

I thought teaching children that using threats and bully tactics was a bad thing?


Fund them, they been cutting school funds for ten years now, How is it you can believe that crap ? My mom threatened to beat my ass if I didn`t go to school,...it worked. If it aint broke, don`t fix it.
 
You could try composting, creative recycling and reducing your waste stream by not buying a bunch of crap.

Also, if a person is forced to buy a "service" from one party only (whether they use it or not) and other people are prevented from engaging in providing that same service do you think that is or is not the most efficient and ethical mode?
upload_2015-11-28_12-29-34.png
 
If you pay taxes on land and you as an individual did not make a consensual choice absent any duress to do so and then claim the tax is justified AND that YOU really own the land...does that mean you are exposing your cognitive dissonance? Yes, why yes it does.

We are, and continue to, collide at a crossroad in our debate(s). Neither of us will convince the other of our arguments, and since your argument is of descending opinion and quite unfavorable -- I'm ok with agreeing to disagree. So you go on and continue to think the world is stupid for not seeing it your way, and the rest of us will continue leading happy lives, not being you.
 
Also, if a person is forced to buy a "service" from one party only (whether they use it or not) and other people are prevented from engaging in providing that same service do you think that is or is not the most efficient and ethical mode?

That's called a monopoly - and they have laws for that. And of course, in your world, anyone or business with an advantage will quickly become a monopoly, because, ya know, forceable coercion and laws are for the cognitive dissonant.
 
That's called a monopoly - and they have laws for that. And of course, in your world, anyone or business with an advantage will quickly become a monopoly, because, ya know, forceable coercion and laws are for the cognitive dissonant.


Is a coercion based monopoly a good thing or a bad thing, Mr. Cognitive Diss? Isn't that the definition of government?

A coercion based monopoly in a truly free market is virtually impossible though....

If people are free to trade on a consensual basis, any "monopoly" that arises, comes about because the consumers have independently and freely decided in large numbers, (thus creating an affirmative aggregate) that a given service provider gives such excellent service that the "monopoly" is created. If the service provider fails to uphold that level, competitors can easily sway customers, since the customers are free to go elsewhere.

Net result is in a free market any monopolies are created by excellent service, not by edicts of force that hold or limit consumers to a false set of options.

By the way, your liberal Economics Professors were wrong, that's why they seek the security of coercion based state sponsored colleges / degree mills.
 
Back
Top